During development, the endoderm initiates organ-restricted gene expression patterns in a spatiotemporally controlled manner. This process, termed induction, requires signals from adjacent mesodermal derivatives. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) emanating from the cardiac mesoderm and the septum transversum mesenchyme (STM), respectively, are believed to be simultaneously and uniformly required to directly induce hepatic gene expression from the murine endoderm. Using small molecule inhibitors of BMP signals during liver bud induction in the developing mouse embryo, we found that BMP signaling was not uniformly required to induce hepatic gene expression. Although BMP inhibition caused an overall reduction in the number of induced hepatoblasts, the STM-bounded posterior liver bud demonstrated the most severe loss of the essential hepatic transcription factor, hepatocyte nuclear factor 4-α (HNF4α), whereas the sinus venosus-lined anterior liver bud was less affected. We found that the posterior liver bud progenitors were anteriorly displaced and aberrantly activated pancreatobiliary markers, including sex-determining region Y-box 9 (SOX9). Additionally, we found that ectopically expressed SOX9 inhibited HNF4α and that BMP was indirectly required for hepatoblast induction. Finally, because previous studies have demonstrated that FGF signals are essential for anterior but not posterior liver bud induction, we examined synchronous BMP and FGF inhibition and found this led to a nearly complete loss of hepatoblasts. CONCLUSION: BMP signaling is required to maintain the hepato-pancreatobiliary boundary, at least in part, by indirectly repressing SOX9 in the hepatic endoderm. BMP and FGF signals are each required for the induction of spatially complementary subsets of hepatoblasts. These results underscore the importance of studying early inductive processes in the whole embryo. (Hepatology 2018;68:274-288).
During development, the endoderm initiates organ-restricted gene expression patterns in a spatiotemporally controlled manner. This process, termed induction, requires signals from adjacent mesodermal derivatives. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) emanating from the cardiac mesoderm and the septum transversum mesenchyme (STM), respectively, are believed to be simultaneously and uniformly required to directly induce hepatic gene expression from the murine endoderm. Using small molecule inhibitors of BMP signals during liver bud induction in the developing mouse embryo, we found that BMP signaling was not uniformly required to induce hepatic gene expression. Although BMP inhibition caused an overall reduction in the number of induced hepatoblasts, the STM-bounded posterior liver bud demonstrated the most severe loss of the essential hepatic transcription factor, hepatocyte nuclear factor 4-α (HNF4α), whereas the sinus venosus-lined anterior liver bud was less affected. We found that the posterior liver bud progenitors were anteriorly displaced and aberrantly activated pancreatobiliary markers, including sex-determining region Y-box 9 (SOX9). Additionally, we found that ectopically expressed SOX9 inhibited HNF4α and that BMP was indirectly required for hepatoblast induction. Finally, because previous studies have demonstrated that FGF signals are essential for anterior but not posterior liver bud induction, we examined synchronous BMP and FGF inhibition and found this led to a nearly complete loss of hepatoblasts. CONCLUSION:BMP signaling is required to maintain the hepato-pancreatobiliary boundary, at least in part, by indirectly repressing SOX9 in the hepatic endoderm. BMP and FGF signals are each required for the induction of spatially complementary subsets of hepatoblasts. These results underscore the importance of studying early inductive processes in the whole embryo. (Hepatology 2018;68:274-288).
Authors: Fereshteh Parviz; Christine Matullo; Wendy D Garrison; Laura Savatski; John W Adamson; Gang Ning; Klaus H Kaestner; Jennifer M Rossi; Kenneth S Zaret; Stephen A Duncan Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Z Gu; E M Reynolds; J Song; H Lei; A Feijen; L Yu; W He; D T MacLaughlin; J van den Eijnden-van Raaij; P K Donahoe; E Li Journal: Development Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Richard N Wang; Jordan Green; Zhongliang Wang; Youlin Deng; Min Qiao; Michael Peabody; Qian Zhang; Jixing Ye; Zhengjian Yan; Sahitya Denduluri; Olumuyiwa Idowu; Melissa Li; Christine Shen; Alan Hu; Rex C Haydon; Richard Kang; James Mok; Michael J Lee; Hue L Luu; Lewis L Shi Journal: Genes Dis Date: 2014-09
Authors: Gabriel K El Sebae; Joseph M Malatos; Mary-Kate E Cone; Siyeon Rhee; Jesse R Angelo; Jesse Mager; Kimberly D Tremblay Journal: Development Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Meghan Maguire; Michele Campaigne Larsen; Chad M Vezina; Loredana Quadro; Youn-Kyung Kim; Sherry A Tanumihardjo; Colin R Jefcoate Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 3.240