Literature DB >> 29315576

The metaboreflex does not contribute to the increase in muscle sympathetic nerve activity to contracting muscle during static exercise in humans.

Daniel Boulton1, Chloe E Taylor1,2, Simon Green1,2,3, Vaughan G Macefield2,3,4.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: It is not clear how sympathetic activity to contracting muscle is controlled. We recorded muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) to the ipsilateral tibialis anterior muscle during 4 min of isometric dorsiflexion of the ankle and 6 min of post-exercise ischaemia, which was repeated contralaterally. MSNA to the contracting muscle increased within 1 min of static exercise and returned to pre-contraction levels at the end. Unlike the increase in MSNA seen in the non-contracting muscle, post-exercise ischaemia had no effect on MSNA to the contracted muscle. We conclude that central command is the primary mechanism responsible for increasing MSNA to contracting muscle and also that the metaboreflex is not expressed in contracting muscle. ABSTRACT: Both central command and metaboreflex inputs from contracting muscles increase muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) to non-contracting muscle during sustained isometric exercise. We recently showed that MSNA to contracting muscle also increases in an intensity-dependent manner, although whether this can be sustained by the metaboreflex is unknown. MSNA was recorded from the left common peroneal nerve and individual spikes of MSNA extracted from the nerve signal. Eleven subjects performed a series of 4 min dorsiflexions of the left ankle at 10% of maximum voluntary contraction under three conditions: without ischaemia, with 6 min of post-exercise ischaemia, and with ischaemia during and after exercise; these were repeated in the right leg. Compared with pre-contraction values, MSNA to the contracting muscles increased and plateaued in the first minute of contraction (50 ± 18 vs. 34 ± 10 spikes min-1 , P = 0.01), returned to pre-contraction levels within 1 min of the contraction ending and was not influenced by ischaemia during or after contraction. Conversely, MSNA to the non-contracting muscles was not different from pre-contraction levels in the first minute of contraction (34 ± 9 vs. 32 ± 5 spikes min-1 , P = 0.48), whereas it increased each minute and was significantly greater by the second minute (44 ± 8 spikes min-1 , P = 0.01). Ischaemia augmented the MSNA response to contraction (63 ± 25 spikes min-1 after 4 min, P < 0.05) and post-exercise ischaemia (63 ± 27 spikes min-1 after 6 min, P < 0.01) for the non-contracting muscles only. These findings support our conclusion that the metaboreflex is not expressed in the contracting muscle during sustained static exercise.
© 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2018 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  central command; metaboreflex; muscle contraction; sympathetic

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29315576      PMCID: PMC5851889          DOI: 10.1113/JP275526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  40 in total

1.  Muscle sympathetic nerve activity responses to dynamic passive muscle stretch in humans.

Authors:  Jian Cui; Cheryl Blaha; Raman Moradkhan; Kristen S Gray; Lawrence I Sinoway
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Modulation of muscle sympathetic bursts by sinusoidal galvanic vestibular stimulation in human subjects.

Authors:  Leah R Bent; Philip S Bolton; Vaughan G Macefield
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of partial neuromuscular blockade on sympathetic nerve responses to static exercise in humans.

Authors:  R G Victor; S L Pryor; N H Secher; J H Mitchell
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  Discharge properties of group III and IV muscle afferents: their responses to mechanical and metabolic stimuli.

Authors:  M P Kaufman; K J Rybicki
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  The role of muscle mass in the cardiovascular response to static contractions.

Authors:  J H Mitchell; F C Payne; B Saltin; B Schibye
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Respiratory modulation of muscle sympathetic nerve activity is not increased in essential hypertension or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Rania Fatouleh; Vaughan G Macefield
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Sympathetic nerve discharge is coupled to muscle cell pH during exercise in humans.

Authors:  R G Victor; L A Bertocci; S L Pryor; R L Nunnally
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Coherence between the sympathetic drives to relaxed and contracting muscles of different limbs of human subjects.

Authors:  B G Wallin; D Burke; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Contributions of Central Command and Muscle Feedback to Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Contracting Human Skeletal Muscle.

Authors:  Daniel Boulton; Chloe E Taylor; Vaughan G Macefield; Simon Green
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Effect of contraction intensity on sympathetic nerve activity to active human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Daniel Boulton; Chloe E Taylor; Vaughan G Macefield; Simon Green
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.566

View more
  11 in total

1.  Effects of dynamic arm and leg exercise on muscle sympathetic nerve activity and vascular conductance in the inactive leg.

Authors:  Connor J Doherty; Trevor J King; Anthony V Incognito; Jordan B Lee; Andrew D Shepherd; Joseph A Cacoilo; Joshua T Slysz; Jamie F Burr; Philip J Millar
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-06-27

2.  Muscle sympathetic outflow during exercise: a tale of two limbs.

Authors:  Anthony V Incognito; Connor J Doherty; Trevor J King
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Absent metaboreflex-induced increases in sympathetic outflow to contracting muscle.

Authors:  Matthew C Babcock; Joseph C Watso
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Cardiac autonomic recovery following traditional and augmented remote ischemic preconditioning.

Authors:  William N Morley; Alexandra M Coates; Jamie F Burr
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  The exercise pressor reflex: An update.

Authors:  André L Teixeira; Lauro C Vianna
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.625

6.  Muscle metaboreflex-induced increases in effective arterial elastance: effect of heart failure.

Authors:  Joseph Mannozzi; Jasdeep Kaur; Marty D Spranger; Mohamed-Hussein Al-Hassan; Beruk Lessanework; Alberto Alvarez; Charles S Chung; Donal S O'Leary
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Maintenance of contractile force of the hind limb muscles by the somato-lumbar sympathetic reflexes.

Authors:  Harumi Hotta; Kaori Iimura; Nobuhiro Watanabe; Kazuhiro Shigemoto
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.781

8.  Enhanced Metabolic Stress Augments Ischemic Preconditioning for Exercise Performance.

Authors:  Joshua T Slysz; Jamie F Burr
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  The Role of Central Command in the Increase in Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity to Contracting Muscle During High Intensity Isometric Exercise.

Authors:  Daniel Boulton; Chloe E Taylor; Simon Green; Vaughan G Macefield
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Arterial Baroreflex Inhibits Muscle Metaboreflex Induced Increases in Effective Arterial Elastance: Implications for Ventricular-Vascular Coupling.

Authors:  Joseph Mannozzi; Jong-Kyung Kim; Javier A Sala-Mercado; Mohamed-Hussein Al-Hassan; Beruk Lessanework; Alberto Alvarez; Louis Massoud; Tauheed Bhatti; Kamel Aoun; Donal S O'Leary
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.