Literature DB >> 29315421

Development of a new comprehensive and reliable endometrial receptivity map (ER Map/ER Grade) based on RT-qPCR gene expression analysis.

M Enciso1, J P Carrascosa2, J Sarasa1, P A Martínez-Ortiz3, S Munné4, J A Horcajadas2, J Aizpurua3.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Is it possible to determine the receptivity status of an endometrium by combined quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) expression analysis of genes involved in endometrial proliferation and immunity? SUMMARY ANSWER: The new ER Map®/ER Grade® test can predict endometrial receptivity status by RT-qPCR using a new panel of genes involved in endometrial proliferation and the maternal immune response associated to embryonic implantation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The human endometrium reaches a receptive status adequate for embryonic implantation around Days 19-21 of the menstrual cycle. During this period, known as the window of implantation (WOI), the endometrium shows a specific gene expression profile suitable for endometrial function evaluation. The number of molecular diagnostic tools currently available to characterize this process is very limited. In this study, a new system for human endometrial receptivity evaluation was optimized and presented for the first time. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: ER Map®/ER Grade® validation was achieved on 312 endometrial samples including fertile women and patients undergoing fertility treatment between July 2014 and March 2016. Expression analyses of 184 genes involved in endometrial receptivity and immune response were performed. Samples were additionally tested with an independent endometrial receptivity test. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: A total of 96 fertile women and 120 assisted reproduction treatment (ART) patients participated in the study. Endometrial biopsy samples were obtained at LH + 2 and LH + 7 days in fertile subjects in a natural cycle and at the window of implantation (WOI) in patients in a hormone-replacement therapy (HRT) cycle. Total RNA was purified, quality-checked and reverse-transcribed. Gene expression was quantified by high-throughput RT-qPCR and statistically analyzed. Informative genes were selected and used to classify samples into four different groups of endometrial receptivity status. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Significantly different gene expression levels were found in 85 out of 184 selected genes when comparing LH + 2 and LH + 7 samples (paired t-test, P < 0.05). Gene ontology analyses revealed that cell division and proliferation, cell signaling and response, extracellular organization and communication, immunological activity, vascular proliferation, blood pressure regulation and embryo implantation are the most over-represented biological terms in this group of genes. Principal component analysis and discriminant functional analysis showed that 40 of the differentially expressed genes allowed accurate classification of samples according to endometrial status (proliferative, pre-receptive, receptive and post-receptive) in both fertile and infertile groups. LARGE SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: To evaluate the efficacy of this new tool to improve ART outcomes, further investigations such as non-selection studies and randomized controlled trials will also be required. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: A new comprehensive system for human endometrial receptivity evaluation based on gene expression analysis has been developed. The identification of the optimal time for embryo transfer is essential to maximize the effectiveness of ART. This study is a new step in the field of personalized medicine in human reproduction which may help in the management of endometrial preparation for embryo transfer, increasing the chances of pregnancy for many couples. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The authors have no potential conflict of interest to declare. No external funding was obtained for this study.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  embryo-endometrial synchrony; endometrial receptivity; endometrium; personalized embryo transfer; window of implantation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29315421     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  17 in total

1.  Transcriptomic analysis of the interaction of choriocarcinoma spheroids with receptive vs. non-receptive endometrial epithelium cell lines: an in vitro model for human implantation.

Authors:  Paula Vergaro; Gustavo Tiscornia; Amelia Rodríguez; Josep Santaló; Rita Vassena
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Automation in ART: Paving the Way for the Future of Infertility Treatment.

Authors:  Kadrina Abdul Latif Abdullah; Tomiris Atazhanova; Alejandro Chavez-Badiola; Sourima Biswas Shivhare
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  The mid-secretory endometrial transcriptomic landscape in endometriosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E Vargas; E García-Moreno; L Aghajanova; A Salumets; J A Horcajadas; F J Esteban; S Altmäe
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-04-04

4.  Construction of implantation failure related lncRNA-mRNA network and identification of lncRNA biomarkers for predicting endometrial receptivity.

Authors:  Chun Feng; Jin-Ming Shen; Ping-Ping Lv; Min Jin; Li-Quan Wang; Jin-Peng Rao; Lei Feng
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 6.580

Review 5.  Milestones of Precision Medicine: An Innovative, Multidisciplinary Overview.

Authors:  Jesús García-Foncillas; Jesús Argente; Luis Bujanda; Victoria Cardona; Bonaventura Casanova; Ana Fernández-Montes; José A Horcajadas; Andrés Iñiguez; Alberto Ortiz; José L Pablos; María Vanessa Pérez Gómez
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.074

6.  Blastocyst-stage embryos provide better frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcomes for young patients with previous fresh embryo transfer failure.

Authors:  Lanlan Fang; Jingyan He; Yang Yan; Qiongqiong Jia; Yiping Yu; Ruizhe Zhang; Jung-Chien Cheng; Ying-Pu Sun
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.682

7.  Selection of the Reference Gene for Expression Normalization in Papaver somniferum L. under Abiotic Stress and Hormone Treatment.

Authors:  Zhaoping Zhang; Changjian Li; Junqing Zhang; Fang Chen; Yongfu Gong; Yanrong Li; Yujie Su; Yujie Wei; Yucheng Zhao
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 8.  Diagnostic and therapeutic options in recurrent implantation failure.

Authors:  Sarah Moustafa; Steven L Young
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-03-25

Review 9.  Molecular Signaling Regulating Endometrium-Blastocyst Crosstalk.

Authors:  Micol Massimiani; Valentina Lacconi; Fabio La Civita; Carlo Ticconi; Rocco Rago; Luisa Campagnolo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Determining the Molecular Background of Endometrial Receptivity in Adenomyosis.

Authors:  Erika Prašnikar; Tanja Kunej; Jure Knez; Katja Repnik; Uroš Potočnik; Borut Kovačič
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.