Literature DB >> 29314858

Panitumumab Modified with Metal-Chelating Polymers (MCP) Complexed to 111In and 177Lu-An EGFR-Targeted Theranostic for Pancreatic Cancer.

Sadaf Aghevlian1, Yijie Lu2, Mitchell A Winnik2, David W Hedley3, Raymond M Reilly1,4,5.   

Abstract

A metal-chelating polymer (MCP) with a polyglutamide (PGlu) backbone presenting on average 13 DOTA (tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid) chelators for complexing 111In or 177Lu and 10 polyethylene glycol (PEG) chains to minimize liver and spleen uptake was conjugated to antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb), panitumumab. Because panitumumab-MCP may be dual-labeled with 111In and 177Lu for SPECT, or radioimmunotherapy (RIT) exploiting the Auger electrons or β-particle emissions, respectively, we propose that panitumumab-MCP could be a useful theranostic agent for EGFR-positive PnCa. Bioconjugation was achieved by reaction of a hydrazine nicotinamide (HyNIC) group on the MCP with an aryl aromatic aldehyde introduced into panitumumab by reaction with succinimidyl-4-formylbenzamide (S-4FB). The conjugation reaction was monitored by measurement of the chromophoric bis-aryl hydrazone bond formed (ε350 nm = 24 500 M-1 cm-1) to achieve two MCPs/panitumumab. Labeling of panitumumab-MCP with 111In or 177Lu demonstrated that masses as small as 0.1 μg were labeled to >90% labeling efficiency (L.E.) and a specific activity (SA) of >70 MBq/μg. Panitumumab-DOTA incorporating two DOTA per mAb was labeled with 111In or 177Lu to a maximum SA of 65 MBq/μg and 46 MBq/μg, respectively. Panitumumab-MCP-177Lu exhibited saturable binding to EGFR-overexpressing MDA-MB-468 human breast cancer cells. The Kd for binding of panitumumab-MCP-177Lu to EGFR (2.2 ± 0.6 nmol/L) was not significantly different than panitumumab-DOTA-177Lu (1.0 ± 0.4 nmol/L). 111In and 177Lu were stably complexed to panitumumab-MCP. Panitumumab-MCP-111In exhibited similar whole body retention (55-60%) as panitumumab-DOTA-111In in NOD-scid mice up to 72 h postinjection (p.i.) and equivalent excretion of radioactivity into the urine and feces. The uptake of panitumumab-MCP-111In in most normal tissues in NOD-scid mice with EGFR-positive PANC-1 human pancreatic cancer (PnCa) xenografts at 72 h p.i. was not significantly different than panitumumab-DOTA-111In, except for the liver which was 3-fold greater for panitumumab-MCP-111In. Tumor uptake of panitumumab-MCP-111In (6.9 ± 1.3%ID/g) was not significantly different than panitumumab-DOTA-11In (6.6 ± 3.3%ID/g). Tumor uptake of panitumumab-MCP-111In and panitumumab-DOTA-111In were reduced by preadministration of excess panitumumab, suggesting EGFR-mediated uptake. Tumor uptake of nonspecific IgG-MCP (5.4 ± 0.3%ID/g) was unexpectedly similar to panitumumab-MCP-111In. An increased hydrodynamic radius of IgG when conjugated to an MCP may encourage tumor uptake via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Tumor uptake of panitumumab-DOTA-111In was 3.5-fold significantly higher than IgG-DOTA-111In. PANC-1 tumors were imaged by microSPECT/CT at 72 h p.i. of panitumumab-MCP-111In or panitumumab-DOTA-111In. Tumors were not visualized with preadministration of excess panitumumab to block EGFR, or with nonspecific IgG radioimmunoconjugates. We conclude that linking panitumumab to an MCP enabled higher SA labeling with 111In and 177Lu than DOTA-conjugated panitumumab, with preserved EGFR binding in vitro and comparable tumor localization in vivo in mice with s.c. PANC-1 human PnCa xenografts. Normal tissue distribution was similar except for the liver which was higher for the polymer radioimmunoconjugates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  imaging; indium-111; lutetium-177; metal-chelating polymers; pancreatic cancer; panitumumab; radioimmunotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29314858     DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b01000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharm        ISSN: 1543-8384            Impact factor:   4.939


  10 in total

1.  Dendrimer Scaffold for the Amplification of In Vivo Pretargeting Ligations.

Authors:  Brendon E Cook; Rosemery Membreno; Brian M Zeglis
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.774

2.  Oridonin-loaded and GPC1-targeted gold nanoparticles for multimodal imaging and therapy in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Wenli Qiu; Rong Chen; Xiao Chen; Huifeng Zhang; Lina Song; Wenjing Cui; Jingjing Zhang; Dandan Ye; Yifen Zhang; Zhongqiu Wang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-10-24

3.  Radioimmunotherapy of PANC-1 human pancreatic cancer xenografts in NOD/SCID or NRG mice with Panitumumab labeled with Auger electron emitting, 111In or β-particle emitting, 177Lu.

Authors:  Sadaf Aghevlian; Zhongli Cai; David Hedley; Mitchell A Winnik; Raymond M Reilly
Journal:  EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem       Date:  2020-11-09

Review 4.  PET and SPECT Imaging of the EGFR Family (RTK Class I) in Oncology.

Authors:  Sara S Rinne; Anna Orlova; Vladimir Tolmachev
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Glutamate dehydrogenase 1 mediated glutaminolysis sustains HCC cells survival under glucose deprivation.

Authors:  Yujiao Zhou; Haibo Yu; Shengtao Cheng; Yao Chen; Lin He; Jihua Ren; Xin He; Juan Chen; Lu Zheng; Fan Li
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 6.  Recent advances in metallopolymer-based drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Gulzhian I Dzhardimalieva; Lev N Rabinskiy; Kamila A Kydralieva; Igor E Uflyand
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 7.  Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: The Dawn of the Era of Nuclear Medicine?

Authors:  Christopher Montemagno; Shamir Cassim; Nicolas De Leiris; Jérôme Durivault; Marc Faraggi; Gilles Pagès
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Auger electrons for cancer therapy - a review.

Authors:  Anthony Ku; Valerie J Facca; Zhongli Cai; Raymond M Reilly
Journal:  EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem       Date:  2019-10-11

Review 9.  Monoclonal antibody-based molecular imaging strategies and theranostic opportunities.

Authors:  Niels Dammes; Dan Peer
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 10.  Smart magnetic resonance imaging-based theranostics for cancer.

Authors:  Beatriz Brito; Thomas W Price; Juan Gallo; Manuel Bañobre-López; Graeme J Stasiuk
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 11.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.