Literature DB >> 29314655

Randomized controlled trial of standard closure of a stoma site vs biological mesh reinforcement: study protocol of the ROCSS trial.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Closure of complex and contaminated abdominal wounds is challenging and carries risks, including wound dehiscence and incisional hernia. Hernia formation at closed stoma sites occurs in up to 30% of patients. Use of biological meshes in these situations may provide a safe method of reducing these complications, especially long-term incisional hernias.
METHOD: The Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site (ROCSS) study is a Phase III multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) with an internal feasibility study. The primary objective of ROCSS is to assess whether a biological mesh (collagen tissue matrix) reduces the incidence of clinically detectable stoma closure site hernias at 2 years compared with standard closure techniques. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either standard suture (nonmesh) closure or closure with an intra-abdominal biological mesh reinforcement. Patients and outcome assessors are masked to treatment allocation. ROCSS aims to recruit 560 patients, with an option to recruit to 790 patients to increase power. The primary outcome measure is the occurrence of clinically detectable hernias years 2 years postrandomization. The secondary outcome measures are the radiological hernia rate at 1 year, incidence of symptomatic hernia, the surgical complication/re-intervention rate, quality of life, postoperative pain and cost-benefit analysis. DISCUSSION: ROCSS is a multicentre RCT assessing the placement of a biological mesh at the site of stoma closure on clinical hernia rate. Our hypothesis is that reinforcing the stoma closure site with a collagen mesh is superior to the standard technique in reducing the risk of herniation at 2 years. These findings could influence future closure of stomas and other complex and/or contaminated abdominal wounds in settings around the world. Colorectal Disease
© 2018 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Randomized trial; biological mesh; hernia; incisional hernia; medical device; stoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29314655     DOI: 10.1111/codi.13997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  5 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of incisional hernia post-reversal of ileostomy.

Authors:  F De Haes; N L Bullen; G A Antoniou; N J Smart; S A Antoniou
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Incidence of and risk factors for incisional hernia after closure of temporary ileostomy for colorectal malignancy.

Authors:  T Kaneko; K Funahashi; M Ushigome; S Kagami; M Goto; T Koda; Y Nagashima; H Shiokawa; J Koike
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Hernia at the stoma site after loop ileostomy reversal.

Authors:  Karolina Eklöv; Fred Zika Viktorsson; Eric Frosztega; Sven Bringman; Jonas Nygren; Åsa H Everhov
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Preloop trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Elisa Mäkäräinen-Uhlbäck; Heikki Wiik; Jyrki Kössi; Pasi Ohtonen; Tero Rautio
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 202.731

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.