Literature DB >> 29314077

Accuracy and reliability of a hand-held in vivo skin indentation device to assess skin elasticity.

T Virén1,2, J T Iivarinen1, J K Sarin1, I Harvima3, H N Mayrovitz4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a hand-held indentation device for fast and reliable determination of skin stiffness.
METHODS: Device accuracy to indentation depths of 0.6 and 1.3 mm was first evaluated on plastic foam materials with mechanical properties verified by a laboratory material testing device. Subsequently, the device's sensitivity to detect age-related changes in skin stiffness was evaluated among 46 healthy women (18-79 years). Finally, the reproducibility of the method was tested with six healthy subjects.
RESULTS: High correlation was detected between indentation stiffness of reference material and Young's modulus determined with mechanical testing device (0.6 mm indenter: r = 0.97, P = 0.05; 1.3 mm indenter: r = 0.98, P = 0.04). Age-related decrease of 38% in skin stiffness was observed in healthy volunteers (P < 0.05). The coefficient of variation for 0.6 and 1.3 mm indenters was 7.4% and 8.5%, respectively. No trend related to hysteresis effect was observed from repeated measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: The presented indentation technique was accurate against the laboratory material testing device. Furthermore, skin changes related to ageing could be detected with the indentation technique. The new device was found to be feasible for monitoring skin stiffness in cosmetics and clinical conditions.
© 2018 Society of Cosmetic Scientists and the Société Française de Cosmétologie.

Entities:  

Keywords:  elasticity; indentation; microbiology (skin)/preservation (products); skin physiology/structure; skin repair/acne/rosacea/dandruff/striae

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29314077     DOI: 10.1111/ics.12444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci        ISSN: 0142-5463            Impact factor:   2.970


  5 in total

1.  Light emitting diode-red light for reduction of post-surgical scarring: Results from a dose-ranging, split-face, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alana Kurtti; Julie K Nguyen; Jeremy Weedon; Andrew Mamalis; Yi Lai; Natasha Masub; Amaris Geisler; Daniel M Siegel; Jared R Jagdeo
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.207

2.  Effect of endoscope flexibility on tissue dissection profile assessed with pulsed water jet device: ensuring safety, efficacy, and handling of thin devices for neuroendoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Tetsuya Kusunoki; Tomohiro Kawaguchi; Atsuhiro Nakagawa; Yuta Noguchi; Shin-Ichiro Osawa; Hidenori Endo; Toshiki Endo; Ryuta Saito; Masayuki Kanamori; Kuniyasu Niizuma; Teiji Tominaga
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2021-02-17

3.  In vivo soft tissue compressive properties of the human hand.

Authors:  Victoria Spartacus; Maedeh Shojaeizadeh; Vincent Raffault; James Shoults; Ken Van Wieren; Carolyn J Sparrey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A biphasic multilayer computational model of human skin.

Authors:  David Sachs; Adam Wahlsten; Sebastian Kozerke; Gaetana Restivo; Edoardo Mazza
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-02-10

5.  Smart Scar Care-Industry 4.0 in Individualized Compression Garments: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Tobias Kisch; Felix H Stang; Peter Mailaender; Sophie Schleusser; Dominik Michel; Rainer Trieb; Sebastian Bannwarth; Simone Maly; Anika Dallmann; Sebastian Klasen; Christian Kaiser; Timo Schmeltzpfenning; Wolfgang Rempp; Martin Lades; Dominik Šurc; Boris Bauer; Alexander Artschwager; Reinhard Vonthein
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-07-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.