Literature DB >> 29313987

Variable role of carotid bodies in cardiovascular responses to exercise, hypoxia and hypercapnia in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Wioletta Pijacka1, Pedro L Katayama1,2, Helio C Salgado2, Gisele S Lincevicius1,3, Ruy R Campos3, Fiona D McBryde4, Julian F R Paton1,4.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: Carotid bodies play a critical role in maintaining arterial pressure during hypoxia and this has important implications when considering resection therapy of the carotid body in disease states such as hypertension. Curbing hypertension in patients whether resting or under stress remains a major global health challenge. We demonstrated previously the benefits of removing carotid body afferent input into the brain for both alleviating sympathetic overdrive and reducing blood pressure in neurogenic hypertension. We describe a new approach in rats for selective ablation of the carotid bodies that spares the functional integrity of the carotid sinus baroreceptors, and demonstrate the importance of the carotid bodies in the haemodynamic response to forced exercise, hypoxia and hypercapnia in conditions of hypertension. Selective ablation reduced blood pressure in hypertensive rats and re-set baroreceptor reflex function accordingly; the increases in blood pressure seen during exercise, hypoxia and hypercapnia were unaffected, abolished and augmented, respectively, after selective carotid body removal. The data suggest that carotid body ablation may trigger potential cardiovascular risks particularly during hypoxia and hypercapnia and that suppression rather than obliteration of their activity may be a more effective and safer route to pursue. ABSTRACT: The carotid body has recently emerged as a promising therapeutic target for treating cardiovascular disease, but the potential impact of carotid body removal on the dynamic cardiovascular responses to acute stressors such as exercise, hypoxia and hypercapnia in hypertension is an important safety consideration that has not been studied. We first validated a novel surgical approach to selectively resect the carotid bodies bilaterally (CBR) sparing the carotid sinus baroreflex. Second, we evaluated the impact of CBR on the cardiovascular responses to exercise, hypoxia and hypercapnia in conscious, chronically instrumented spontaneously hypertensive (SH) rats. The results confirm that our CBR technique successfully and selectively abolished the chemoreflex, whilst preserving carotid baroreflex function. CBR produced a sustained fall in arterial pressure in the SH rat of ∼20 mmHg that persisted across both dark and light phases (P < 0.001), with baroreflex function curves resetting around lower arterial pressure levels. The cardiovascular and respiratory responses to moderate forced exercise were similar between CBR and Sham rats. In contrast, CBR abolished the pressor response to hypoxia seen in Sham animals, although the increases in heart rate and respiration were similar between Sham and CBR groups. Both the pressor and the respiratory responses to 7% hypercapnia were augmented after CBR (P < 0.05) compared to sham. Our finding that the carotid bodies play a critical role in maintaining arterial pressure during hypoxia has important implications when considering resection therapy of the carotid body in disease states such as hypertension as well as heart failure with sleep apnoea.
© 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2018 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  baroreflex; blood pressure; exercise; peripheral chemoreceptor; selective ablation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29313987      PMCID: PMC6068247          DOI: 10.1113/JP275487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  57 in total

1.  Functional abolition of carotid body activity restores insulin action and glucose homeostasis in rats: key roles for visceral adipose tissue and the liver.

Authors:  Joana F Sacramento; Maria J Ribeiro; Tiago Rodrigues; Elena Olea; Bernardete F Melo; Maria P Guarino; Rui Fonseca-Pinto; Cristiana R Ferreira; Joana Coelho; Ana Obeso; Raquel Seiça; Paulo Matafome; Sílvia V Conde
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2016-10-16       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Contribution of excitatory amino acid receptors of the retrotrapezoid nucleus to the sympathetic chemoreflex in rats.

Authors:  Ana C Takakura; Thiago S Moreira
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.969

3.  Carotid body resection for sympathetic modulation in systolic heart failure: results from first-in-man study.

Authors:  Piotr Niewinski; Dariusz Janczak; Artur Rucinski; Stanislaw Tubek; Zoar J Engelman; Pawel Piesiak; Przemyslaw Jazwiec; Waldemar Banasiak; Marat Fudim; Paul A Sobotka; Shahrokh Javaheri; Emma C J Hart; Julian F R Paton; Piotr Ponikowski
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 15.534

4.  Purinergic receptors in the carotid body as a new drug target for controlling hypertension.

Authors:  Wioletta Pijacka; Davi J A Moraes; Laura E K Ratcliffe; Angus K Nightingale; Emma C Hart; Melina P da Silva; Benedito H Machado; Fiona D McBryde; Ana P Abdala; Anthony P Ford; Julian F R Paton
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Cardiovascular responses to hypoxemia in sinoaortic-denervated fetal sheep.

Authors:  J Itskovitz; E F LaGamma; J Bristow; A M Rudolph
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.756

6.  Exercise training improves aortic endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation and determinants of nitric oxide bioavailability in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Authors:  Drew A Graham; James W E Rush
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-01-29

7.  Postnatal development of CO2-O2 interaction in the rat carotid body in vitro.

Authors:  D R Pepper; R C Landauer; P Kumar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Extracellular potassium and chemosensitivity in the rat carotid body, in vitro.

Authors:  D R Pepper; R C Landauer; P Kumar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  Inflammation and oxidative stress during intermittent hypoxia: the impact on chemoreception.

Authors:  Rodrigo Iturriaga; Esteban A Moya; Rodrigo Del Rio
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.969

10.  Intact blood pressure, but not sympathetic, responsiveness to sympathoexcitatory stimuli in a patient with unilateral carotid body resection.

Authors:  Kathryn F Larson; Jacqueline K Limberg; Sarah E Baker; Michael J Joyner; Timothy B Curry
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-04
View more
  6 in total

1.  Ablation of the carotid bodies in disease: meeting its adverse effects.

Authors:  Silvia V Conde
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Role of microglia in blood pressure and respiratory responses to acute hypoxic exposure in rats.

Authors:  Masashi Yoshizawa; Isato Fukushi; Kotaro Takeda; Yosuke Kono; Yohei Hasebe; Keiichi Koizumi; Keiko Ikeda; Mieczyslaw Pokorski; Takako Toda; Yasumasa Okada
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 2.257

Review 3.  Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla and Hypertension.

Authors:  Patrice G Guyenet; Ruth L Stornetta; Benjamin B Holloway; George M P R Souza; Stephen B G Abbott
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 4.  Molecular Mechanisms of Acute Oxygen Sensing by Arterial Chemoreceptor Cells. Role of Hif2α.

Authors:  Patricia Ortega-Sáenz; Alejandro Moreno-Domínguez; Lin Gao; José López-Barneo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Blood Pressure Regulation by the Carotid Sinus Nerve: Clinical Implications for Carotid Body Neuromodulation.

Authors:  Silvia V Conde; Joana F Sacramento; Bernardete F Melo; Rui Fonseca-Pinto; Mario I Romero-Ortega; Maria P Guarino
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Editorial: Hypoxia and Cardiorespiratory Control.

Authors:  Yasumasa Okada; Julian F R Paton; José López-Barneo; Richard J A Wilson; Nephtali Marina; Mieczyslaw Pokorski
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.