Literature DB >> 29313819

Real-world safety and efficacy of WATCHMAN LAA closure at one year in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy: results of the DAPT subgroup from the EWOLUTION all-comers study.

Martin W Bergmann1, Hüseyin Ince, Stephan Kische, Thomas Schmitz, Felix Meincke, Boris Schmidt, David Foley, Timothy R Betts, Marek Grygier, Alexey V Protopopov, Kenneth M Stein, Lucas V A Boersma.   

Abstract

AIMS: The study aimed to confirm the efficacy and safety of WATCHMAN LAA closure in atrial fibrillation patients unsuitable for oral anticoagulation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The EWOLUTION registry prospectively collects all clinical data on 1,005 European patients implanted with a WATCHMAN device. Following the procedure, 605 patients (60.2%) received dual antiplatelet therapy according to the local standard; DAPT was discontinued in 85% of patients within one year. CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.61.6 and 2.41.2, respectively. The periprocedural SAE rate was 3.3% (2.0% major adverse cardiac events), mostly resolving without sequelae. Device embolisation or pericardial effusion occurred in one (0.2%) and two (0.3%) patients, respectively. TEE (median 62 days post implant, IQR: 47-97) confirmed effective sealing (no leak >5 mm) in 99.2% of patients. Device thrombus was present in 22 patients (4.0%), one patient developed a stroke. One-year mortality in the DAPT group was 9.6% (N=58) reflecting the advanced age and comorbidities in this population. The ischaemic stroke rate at one year was 1.4% (expected based on CHA2DS2-VASc: 7.5%), none fatal. The major bleeding rate was 2.5%, or 2.1% excluding periprocedural events (expected rate on VKA based on HAS-BLED: 5.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: LAA closure with the WATCHMAN device followed by DAPT therapy in a high-risk patient population is safe. At one year, the intervention is associated with a substantial risk reduction regarding ischaemic stroke and major bleeding compared to the expected rate based on CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29313819     DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  9 in total

1.  Watchman outcomes comparing post-implantation anticoagulation with warfarin versus direct oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Ethan Fry; Harini Bollempali; Keith Suarez; Javier Banchs; Jeffrey Michel
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Clinical Impact of Residual Leaks Following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Insights From the NCDR LAAO Registry.

Authors:  Mohamad Alkhouli; Chengan Du; Ammar Killu; Trevor Simard; Peter A Noseworthy; Paul A Friedman; Jeptha P Curtis; James V Freeman; David R Holmes
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-04-03

Review 3.  [Catheter-based atrial appendage closure-current data and future developments].

Authors:  C Skurk; J J Hartung; D M Leistner; U Landmesser
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Left Atrial Appendage Management with the Watchman Device during Hybrid Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Mindy Vroomen; Bart Maesen; Justin G Luermans; Harry J Crijns; Jos G Maessen; Mark La Meir; Laurent Pison
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  Systematic review on left atrial appendage closure with the LAmbre device in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali; Angelos G Rigopoulos; Mammad Mammadov; Abdelrahman Torky; Andrea Auer; Marios Matiakis; Elena Abate; Constantinos Bakogiannis; Stergios Tzikas; Boris Bigalke; Daniel Sedding; Michel Noutsias
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  JCS/JHRS 2021 guideline focused update on non-pharmacotherapy of cardiac arrhythmias.

Authors:  Akihiko Nogami; Takashi Kurita; Kengo Kusano; Masahiko Goya; Morio Shoda; Hiroshi Tada; Shigeto Naito; Teiichi Yamane; Masaomi Kimura; Tsuyoshi Shiga; Kyoko Soejima; Takashi Noda; Hiro Yamasaki; Yoshifusa Aizawa; Tohru Ohe; Takeshi Kimura; Shun Kohsaka; Hideo Mitamura
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2022-01-07

7.  Contrast-enhanced transesophageal echocardiography predicts neo-intimal coverage of device post-left atrial appendage closure.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Wu; Dali Fan; Wei Huang; Yuezhi Meng; Tao Wan; Ezra A Amsterdam; Yejia Shen; Yilong Chen; Dongxing Ma
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 8.  Left atrial appendage exclusion in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Guy Rozen; Gilad Margolis; Ibrahim Marai; Ariel Roguin; Eldad Rahamim; David Planer; Edwin Kevin Heist; Offer Amir; Ilgar Tahiroglu; Jeremy Ruskin; Moussa Mansour; Gabby Elbaz-Greener
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-13

9.  "One-stop shop": safety and efficacy of combining atrial septal defect occlusion and left atrial appendage closure for patients with atrial septal defect and atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Zhi-Hui Zhang; Qing Yao; Hai-Yun Huang; Ping Zhu; Xiang Xu; Zhi-Yuan Song; Hua-Kang Li
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.298

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.