Jodi Summers Holtrop1, Sandra Ruland2, Stephanie Diaz2, Elaine H Morrato3, Eric Jones4. 1. Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine , University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA. Jodi.holtrop@ucdenver.edu. 2. Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine , University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA. 3. Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA. 4. School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Care management and care managers are becoming increasingly prevalent in primary care medical practice as a means of improving population health and reducing unnecessary care. Care managers are often involved in chronic disease management and associated transitional care. In this study, we examined the communication regarding chronic disease care within 24 primary care practices in Michigan and Colorado. We sought to answer the following questions: Do care managers play a key role in chronic disease management in the practice? Does the prominence of the care manager's connectivity within the practice's communication network vary by the type of care management structure implemented? METHODS: Individual written surveys were given to all practice members in the participating practices. Survey questions assessed demographics as well as practice culture, quality improvement, care management activities, and communication regarding chronic disease care. Using social network analysis and other statistical methods, we analyzed the communication dynamics related to chronic disease care for each practice. RESULTS: The structure of chronic disease communication varies greatly from practice to practice. Care managers who were embedded in the practice or co-located were more likely to be in the core of the communication network than were off-site care managers. These care managers also had higher in-degree centrality, indicating that they acted as a hub for communication with team members in many other roles. DISCUSSION: Social network analysis provided a useful means of examining chronic disease communication in practice, and highlighted the central role of care managers in this communication when their role structure supported such communication. Structuring care managers as embedded team members within the practice has important implications for their role in chronic disease communication within primary care.
BACKGROUND: Care management and care managers are becoming increasingly prevalent in primary care medical practice as a means of improving population health and reducing unnecessary care. Care managers are often involved in chronic disease management and associated transitional care. In this study, we examined the communication regarding chronic disease care within 24 primary care practices in Michigan and Colorado. We sought to answer the following questions: Do care managers play a key role in chronic disease management in the practice? Does the prominence of the care manager's connectivity within the practice's communication network vary by the type of care management structure implemented? METHODS: Individual written surveys were given to all practice members in the participating practices. Survey questions assessed demographics as well as practice culture, quality improvement, care management activities, and communication regarding chronic disease care. Using social network analysis and other statistical methods, we analyzed the communication dynamics related to chronic disease care for each practice. RESULTS: The structure of chronic disease communication varies greatly from practice to practice. Care managers who were embedded in the practice or co-located were more likely to be in the core of the communication network than were off-site care managers. These care managers also had higher in-degree centrality, indicating that they acted as a hub for communication with team members in many other roles. DISCUSSION: Social network analysis provided a useful means of examining chronic disease communication in practice, and highlighted the central role of care managers in this communication when their role structure supported such communication. Structuring care managers as embedded team members within the practice has important implications for their role in chronic disease communication within primary care.
Authors: Erin Fries Taylor; Rachel M Machta; David S Meyers; Janice Genevro; Deborah N Peikes Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Julie Sochalski; Tiny Jaarsma; Harlan M Krumholz; Ann Laramee; John J V McMurray; Mary D Naylor; Michael W Rich; Barbara Riegel; Simon Stewart Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2009 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jason S Egginton; Jennifer L Ridgeway; Nilay D Shah; Saranya Balasubramaniam; Joann R Emmanuel; Larry J Prokop; Victor M Montori; Mohammad Hassan Murad Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Yong-Fang Kuo; Mukaila A Raji; Yu-Li Lin; Margaret E Ottenbacher; Daniel Jupiter; James S Goodwin Journal: Med Care Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 2.983