| Literature DB >> 29312955 |
Li-Zhen Sun1,2, Xiao Heng3, Shi-Jie Chen2,3,4.
Abstract
The long-range base pairing between the 5BSL3. 2 and 3'X domains in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genomic RNA is essential for viral replication. Experimental evidence points to the critical role of metal ions, especially Mg2+ ions, in the formation of the 5BSL3.2:3'X kissing complex. Furthermore, NMR studies suggested an important ion-dependent conformational switch in the kissing process. However, for a long time, mechanistic understanding of the ion effects for the process has been unclear. Recently, computational modeling based on the Vfold RNA folding model and the partial charge-based tightly bound ion (PCTBI) model, in combination with the NMR data, revealed novel physical insights into the role of metal ions in the 5BSL3.2-3'X system. The use of the PCTBI model, which accounts for the ion correlation and fluctuation, gives reliable predictions for the ion-dependent electrostatic free energy landscape and ion-induced population shift of the 5BSL3.2:3'X kissing complex. Furthermore, the predicted ion binding sites offer insights about how ion-RNA interactions shift the conformational equilibrium. The integrated theory-experiment study shows that Mg2+ ions may be essential for HCV viral replication. Moreover, the observed Mg2+-dependent conformational equilibrium may be an adaptive property of the HCV genomic RNA such that the equilibrium is optimized to the intracellular Mg2+ concentration in liver cells for efficient viral replication.Entities:
Keywords: HCV; NMR; PCTBI model; RNA folding; Vfold model; metal ion effects
Year: 2017 PMID: 29312955 PMCID: PMC5744182 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2017.00092
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Mol Biosci ISSN: 2296-889X
Figure 1(A) 5BSL3.2 and 3′X mixtures were analyzed by native polyacrylamide gels containing 0, 1, and 2 mM [Mg2+] (left, middle, and right, respectively). (B,C) The kissing (left) and the three-way junction non-kissing (right) structures for 5BSL3.2 (B) and the three-stem loop (3SL; left) and the two-stem loop (2SL; right) structures for 3′X (C). (D) Electrostatic free energy change with the increase in [Mg2+]. (E–G) The ion electrostatic free energies for the different 3D conformations of 2SL 3′X (E), 3SL 3′X (F), and 5BSL3.2 (G) at the different [Mg2+]'s, respectively. (H,I) The structures #9 (H) and #10 (I) with the predicted bound Mg2+ ions at [Mg2+] = 0.2 mM (left) and 2 mM (right). The hairpin and the bulge loops are labeled by yellow and green, respectively. All the solutions contain 150 mM KCl buffer.
Figure 2(A) The electrostatic free energy difference between the 5BSL3.2:3′X kissing complex and the unkissed structure. The inset show the free energy difference between the kissing and unkissed structures for 5BSL3.2:SL2 (yellow). (B,C) are the structures of the 5BSL3.2:3′X kissing complex with the predicted bound Mg2+ ions at [Mg2+] = 0.2 mM (B) and 2 mM (C), respectively. 5BSL3.2 is labeled by blue and 3′X is labeled by green (SL1 and SL3) and yellow (SL2), respectively. Mg2+ ions are shown as red spheres. All the solutions contain 150 mM KCl buffer.