| Literature DB >> 29312929 |
Jie Li1,2, Ji Zhang1, Yan-Li Zhao1, Heng-Yu Huang2, Yuan-Zhong Wang1.
Abstract
Roots, stems, leaves, and flowers of Longdan (Gentiana rigescens Franch. ex Hemsl) were collected from six geographic origins of Yunnan Province (n = 240) to implement the quality assessment based on contents of gentiopicroside, loganic acid, sweroside and swertiamarin and chemical profile using HPLC-DAD and FTIR method combined with principal component analysis (PCA). The content of gentiopicroside (major iridoid glycoside) was the highest in G. rigescens, regardless of tissue and geographic origin. The level of swertiamarin was the lowest, even unable to be detected in samples from Kunming and Qujing. Significant correlations (p < 0.05) between gentiopicroside, loganic acid, sweroside, and swertiamarin were found at inter- or intra-tissues, which were highly depended on geographic origins, indicating the influence of environmental conditions on the conversion and transport of secondary metabolites in G. rigescens. Furthermore, samples were reasonably classified as three clusters along large producing areas where have similar climate conditions, characterized by carbohydrates, phenols, benzoates, terpenoids, aliphatic alcohols, aromatic hydrocarbons, and so forth. The present work provided global information on the chemical profile and contents of major iridoid glycosides in G. rigescens originated from six different origins, which is helpful for controlling quality of herbal medicines systematically.Entities:
Keywords: FTIR; Gentiana rigescens; HPLC; principal component analysis; quality assessment
Year: 2017 PMID: 29312929 PMCID: PMC5743669 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2017.00125
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Collected information of samples.
| P45_WY 1-10 | Cangshan Global Geopark, Dali | — | 2225 | N25°39′03.9″ | E100°09′48.9″ | 24th November, 2012 |
| P67_CY 1-10 | Mopanshan Mountian, Xinping, Yuxi | — | 2016 | N23°58′01.1″ | E101°56′57.1″ | 18th December, 2012 |
| P71_CY 1-10 | Asugou Village, Yiliang, Kunming | Pine woods | 1817 | N25°02′57.7″ | E103°17′39.6″ | 28th December, 2012 |
| P81_CY 1-10 | Duoluotun Village, Fuyuan, Qujing | Weeds | 2072 | N25°42′22.1″ | E104°10′27.5″ | 28th December, 2012 |
| P52_NY 1-10 | Shuicaoba Village, Ninglang, Lijiang | — | 3219 | N27°20′25.2″ | E100°59′01.1″ | 6th December, 2012 |
| P54_NY 1-10 | Haini Village, Weixi, Diqing | — | 2520 | N27°31′05.5″ | E99°22′10.3″ | 6th December, 2012 |
| P190 1-10 | Guji Village, Hezhang Town | Fir woods | 2018 | N27°18′21.2″ | E104°45′57.3″ | 10th October, 2013 |
| P191 1-10 | Huopu Town, Panxian | Fir woods | 1983 | N25°39′51.7″ | E104°23′52.8″ | 24th, October, 2013 |
| P199 1-11 | Baota Mountian, Zhanjie Town, Qingzhen | Pine woods | 1590 | N26°38′22.6″ | E104°43′26.0″ | 24th, October, 2013 |
| P200 1-10 | Daxingzai Village, Wusha, Xingyi | Pine woods | 1598 | N25°07′00.7″ | E104°43′38.2″ | 5th November, 2013 |
| P205 1-10 | Longxiang Mountain, Longli, Duyun | Pine woods | 1300 | N26°27′38.7″ | E106°55′40.8″ | 5th November, 2013 |
| P197 1-20 | Shaping Village, Huangsi Town, Fuquan | Weeds | 1550 | N26°34′10.0″ | E107°21′53.9″ | 5th November, 2013 |
| P198 1-18 | Bailong Village, Kaiyang, Guiyang | Weeds | 1600 | N27°01′35.2″ | E106°19′09.0″ | 24th, October, 2013 |
| P204 1-10 | Jichang Village, Longli, Duyun | Weeds | 1393 | N26°33′33.6″ | E106°54′59.2″ | 5th November, 2013 |
| P208 1-19 | Hongyang Village, Taigong Town, Taijiang | Weeds | 1260 | N26°33′36.2″ | E108°19′45.5″ | 5th November, 2013 |
Figure 1HPLC chromatograms plot of different tissue samples of G. rigescens from six geographic origins.
Figure 2The contents of gentiopicroside, loganic acid, sweroside and swertiamarin in roots (A–D), stems (E–H), leaves (I–L) and flowers (M–P) of G. rigescens from six geographic origins (mg/g, n = 10).
Pearson's correlation coefficients for contents of gentiopicroside, loganic acid, sweroside, and swertiamarin in samples collected from Dali.
| LA | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||
| ST | 0.34 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||
| GE | 0.24 | 0.42 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||
| SO | −0.36 | −0.76 | 0.03 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
| LA | −0.49 | −0.61 | −0.52 | 0.22 | 1.00 | |||||||||||
| ST | 0.27 | 0.44 | −0.12 | −0.63 | −0.34 | 1.00 | ||||||||||
| GE | −0.19 | −0.3 | −0.52 | −0.20 | 0.80 | 0.24 | 1.00 | |||||||||
| SO | −0.34 | −0.59 | −0.37 | 0.27 | 0.87 | −0.17 | 0.81 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| LA | −0.34 | −0.47 | −0.66 | 0.07 | 0.78 | −0.40 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 1.00 | |||||||
| ST | 0.28 | 0.21 | −0.25 | −0.40 | −0.44 | 0.41 | −0.36 | −0.50 | −0.08 | 1.00 | ||||||
| GE | 0.28 | 0.09 | −0.39 | −0.38 | −0.26 | 0.49 | −0.10 | −0.20 | 0.15 | 0.86 | 1.00 | |||||
| SO | −0.32 | −0.45 | −0.76 | 0.07 | 0.49 | −0.04 | 0.37 | 0.43 | 0.81 | 0.26 | 0.57 | 1.00 | ||||
| LA | 0.02 | −0.15 | 0.08 | 0.50 | −0.06 | −0.39 | −0.21 | 0.23 | 0.00 | −0.43 | −0.12 | 0.15 | 1.00 | |||
| ST | −0.35 | −0.37 | −0.03 | 0.56 | 0.14 | −0.17 | 0.02 | 0.49 | −0.07 | −0.31 | −0.04 | 0.22 | 0.76 | 1.00 | ||
| GE | −0.20 | −0.46 | −0.59 | 0.46 | 0.36 | −0.27 | 0.21 | 0.48 | 0.31 | −0.20 | 0.00 | 0.45 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 1.00 | |
| SO | 0.01 | −0.46 | −0.67 | 0.24 | 0.37 | −0.28 | 0.24 | 0.47 | 0.64 | −0.09 | 0.30 | 0.77 | 0.66 | 0.46 | 0.77 | 1.00 |
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01.
LA, loganic acid; ST, swertiamarin; GE, gentiopicroside; SO, sweroside.
Figure 3Second derivative spectral details of root (A), stem (B), leaf (C) and flower (D) samples of G. rigescens from six geographic origins.
Figure 4Scores plot for the first and second dimensions for root (A), stem (B), leaf (C) and flower (D) samples of G. rigescens from three large producing areas i.e. Central Yunnan, Western Yunnan and Northwestern Yunnan.
Figure 5Eigenvalue, percentage of variance and cumulative percentage of variance of PCA for root (A–C), stem (D–F), leaf (G–I) and flower (J–L) samples collected from three large producing areas including six geographic origins.
Result of the validation of the target quantitative method.
| Gentiopicroside | 48.7 | 158.7 | 0.08 | 0.54 | 0.28 | 0.97 | y = 5767x+65 | 0.99 | 106.3 |
| Loganic acid | 5.7 | 19.3 | 0.74 | 0.96 | 3.7 | 1.9 | y = 5514x+33 | 0.99 | 98.4 |
| Swertiamarin | 2.4 | 8.1 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 0.65 | 1.4 | y = 4243x−15 | 0.99 | 98.5 |
| Sweroside | 3.1 | 11.3 | 2.9 | 0.31 | 2.6 | 0.29 | y = 6948x +42 | 0.99 | 96.3 |
R.