Literature DB >> 29312732

Bronchial suction does not facilitate lung collapse when using a double-lumen tube during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Xiang Quan1, Jie Yi1, Yuguang Huang1, Xiuhua Zhang1, Le Shen1, Shanqing Li2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bronchial suction through the lumen of a bronchial blocker has been reported to accelerate lung collapse. The aim of the current study was to examine whether bronchial suction could also facilitate lung collapse when using a double-lumen tube (DLT).
METHODS: Eighty patients scheduled for elective video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer using a DLT for one-lung ventilation (OLV) were randomised into an arm that received bronchial suction and an arm that underwent spontaneous collapse (n=40 per arm). For bronchial suction, a pressure of -30 cmH2O was applied to the lumen of the non-ventilated lung during the first minute of OLV. The primary endpoint was the degree of lung collapse at 10 min after the start of OLV, assessed on a 10-point visual analogue scale (0: fully inflated; 10: complete collapse). Secondary outcomes included lung collapse at 1 and 5 min after the start of OLV, as well as occurrence of intraoperative hypoxemia.
RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) lung collapse scores at 10 min were statistically greater in the bronchial suction arm than in the spontaneous collapse arm [9.0 (9.0-9.0) vs. 8.5 (8.0-9.0); P=0.004]. Lung collapse was also statistically greater in the bronchial suction arm at 5 min [8.0 (7.0-8.0) vs. 7.0 (6.25-7.0) min; P=0.002] and 1 min [4.0 (4.0-5.0) vs. 2.0 (2.0-2.0) min; P<0.001]. None of the patients experienced intraoperative hypoxemia and operative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Bronchial suction resulted in statistically greater but not clinically meaningful lung collapse when using a DLT. However, greater degree of lung collapse at 1-min could be helpful in reducing accidental injuries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaesthesia; double-lumen tube (DLT); one-lung ventilation (OLV); thoracic surgery; video-assisted

Year:  2017        PMID: 29312732      PMCID: PMC5757031          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.11.63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  14 in total

1.  Differential effects of continuous versus intermittent suction on tracheal tissue.

Authors:  R E Czarnik; K S Stone; C C Everhart; B A Preusser
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.210

2.  Choosing a lung isolation device for thoracic surgery: a randomized trial of three bronchial blockers versus double-lumen tubes.

Authors:  Manu Narayanaswamy; Karen McRae; Peter Slinger; Geoffrey Dugas; George W Kanellakos; Andy Roscoe; Melanie Lacroix
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Severe hypoxemia after suction of the nonventilated lung via the bronchial blocker lumen of the univent tube.

Authors:  A Baraka; M Nawfal; N Kawkabani
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  Facilitating lung collapse during one lung ventilation can be rational.

Authors:  John Pfitzner
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  In response.

Authors:  Tatsuya Yoshimura; Kenichi Ueda
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Overview of uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS): past and present.

Authors:  J Matthew Reinersman; Eliseo Passera; Gaetano Rocco
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-03

7.  Speed of collapse of the non-ventilated lung during single-lung ventilation for thoracoscopic surgery: the effect of transient increases in pleural pressure on the venting of gas from the non-ventilated lung.

Authors:  J Pfitzner; M J Peacock; R J Harris
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  The use of air in the inspired gas mixture during two-lung ventilation delays lung collapse during one-lung ventilation.

Authors:  Raynauld Ko; Karen McRae; Gail Darling; Thomas K Waddell; Desmond McGlade; Ken Cheung; Joel Katz; Peter Slinger
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Disconnection technique with a bronchial blocker for improving lung deflation: a comparison with a double-lumen tube and bronchial blocker without disconnection.

Authors:  Ji Young Yoo; Dae Hee Kim; Ho Choi; Kun Kim; Yun Jeong Chae; Sung Yong Park
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Misplacement of left-sided double-lumen tubes into the right mainstem bronchus: incidence, risk factors and blind repositioning techniques.

Authors:  Jeong-Hwa Seo; Jun-Yeol Bae; Hyun Joo Kim; Deok Man Hong; Yunseok Jeon; Jae-Hyon Bahk
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.217

View more
  4 in total

1.  Preemptive one lung ventilation enhances lung collapse during thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yunxiao Zhang; Wanpu Yan; Zhiyi Fan; Xiaozheng Kang; Hongyu Tan; Hao Fu; Zhendong Li; Ke-Neng Chen; Jiheng Chen
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.500

2.  The disconnection technique with the use of a bronchial blocker for improving nonventilated lung collapse in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Qian Cheng; Zhiyong He; Ping Xue; Qianyun Xu; Minmin Zhu; Wankun Chen; Changhong Miao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  A comparison between bronchial blockers and double-lumen tubes for patients undergoing lung resection: A propensity score-matched cohort study.

Authors:  Lin Yang; Xiaojin Wei; Bin Wang; Ruping Dai; Feng Xiao; Junmei Xu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 3.642

4.  A randomised comparison of the efficacy of a Coopdech bronchial blocker and a double-lumen endotracheal tube for minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Tian-Hua Zhang; Xiao-Qing Liu; Long-Hui Cao; Jian-Hua Fu; Wen-Qian Lin
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.