Tianming Chen1,2, Jiewen Jin1, Shilin Chen1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medicinal University, Nanjing 210009, China. 2. Department of Cancer Surgery, Yifu Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medicinal University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To enhance our understanding of the feasibility, effectiveness, safety and quality of life (QoL) of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for inoperable patients with pulmonary tumors. METHODS: The data of 88 patients with pulmonary tumors undergoing RFA were collected. Proof of malignancy was obtained by biopsy in all patients. Diagnoses included non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 74 patients and pulmonary metastases in 14 patients. Patients underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided RFA according to standard protocol and had a 2-year follow-up. Results assessment included feasibility (correct placement of the ablation probe into all targeted tumors), effectiveness (overall survival rate and local control rate), safety (treatment-related complication and changes in pulmonary function) and QoL. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-four RFAs were successfully conducted in 88 patients with 96 nodules. Correct placement of ablation probe into targeted tumors with completion of the planned treatment protocol was feasible in all 88 (100%) patients and no procedure-related deaths occurred. Major complication rate was 4.5% (4/88), which consisted of symptomatic pneumothorax (2/88) and high fever (2/88). No significant worsening of pulmonary function was observed. Tumors shrank obviously at 6 months after RFA with a statistically significance (P<0.001).The overall survival rate in 6 months, 1 year and 2 years were 100%, 95.5% and 70.5%, respectively while the local control rate in 6 months, 1 year and 2 years were 92.1%, 87.5% and 51.1% respectively. There was no significant difference of overall survival rate and local control rate between NSCLC and metastatic carcinoma. No significant worsening of QoL was observed. CONCLUSIONS: CT-guided RFA is a feasible, effective and safe therapy for inoperable patients with pulmonary tumors. However, RFA could not obviously improve the QoL in the patients with pulmonary tumors. More prospective studies comparing RFA with standard non-surgical treatment options were needed.
BACKGROUND: To enhance our understanding of the feasibility, effectiveness, safety and quality of life (QoL) of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for inoperable patients with pulmonary tumors. METHODS: The data of 88 patients with pulmonary tumors undergoing RFA were collected. Proof of malignancy was obtained by biopsy in all patients. Diagnoses included non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 74 patients and pulmonary metastases in 14 patients. Patients underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided RFA according to standard protocol and had a 2-year follow-up. Results assessment included feasibility (correct placement of the ablation probe into all targeted tumors), effectiveness (overall survival rate and local control rate), safety (treatment-related complication and changes in pulmonary function) and QoL. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-four RFAs were successfully conducted in 88 patients with 96 nodules. Correct placement of ablation probe into targeted tumors with completion of the planned treatment protocol was feasible in all 88 (100%) patients and no procedure-related deaths occurred. Major complication rate was 4.5% (4/88), which consisted of symptomatic pneumothorax (2/88) and high fever (2/88). No significant worsening of pulmonary function was observed. Tumors shrank obviously at 6 months after RFA with a statistically significance (P<0.001).The overall survival rate in 6 months, 1 year and 2 years were 100%, 95.5% and 70.5%, respectively while the local control rate in 6 months, 1 year and 2 years were 92.1%, 87.5% and 51.1% respectively. There was no significant difference of overall survival rate and local control rate between NSCLC and metastatic carcinoma. No significant worsening of QoL was observed. CONCLUSIONS: CT-guided RFA is a feasible, effective and safe therapy for inoperable patients with pulmonary tumors. However, RFA could not obviously improve the QoL in the patients with pulmonary tumors. More prospective studies comparing RFA with standard non-surgical treatment options were needed.
Authors: Seyer Safi; Geraldine Rauch; Jan op den Winkel; Josef Kunz; Thomas Schneider; Marc Bischof; Claus Peter Heussel; Peter E Huber; Felix J F Herth; Hendrik Dienemann; Hans Hoffmann Journal: Respiration Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 3.580
Authors: T de Baère; A Aupérin; F Deschamps; P Chevallier; Y Gaubert; V Boige; M Fonck; B Escudier; J Palussiére Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-02-16 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Henry S Park; Frank C Detterbeck; David C Madoff; Brett C Bade; Ulas Kumbasar; Vincent J Mase; Andrew X Li; Justin D Blasberg; Gavitt A Woodard; Whitney S Brandt; Roy H Decker Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 3.005