| Literature DB >> 29312216 |
Francesca Cibelli1, Antonio Bevilacqua1, Maria L Raimondo1, Daniela Campaniello1, Antonia Carlucci1, Claudio Ciccarone1, Milena Sinigaglia1, Maria R Corbo1.
Abstract
Reuse of olive mill wastewaters (OMWWs) in agriculture represents a significant challenge for health and safety of our planet. Phytotoxic compounds in OMWW generally prohibit use of untreated OMWWs for agricultural irrigation or direct discharge into surface waters. However, pretreated OMWW can have positive effects on chemical and microbiological soil characteristics, to fight against fungal soil-borne pathogens. Low amounts of OMWW following thermal (TT-OMWW) and high-pressure homogenization (HPH-OMWW) pretreatments counteracted growth of some of 12 soil-borne and/or pathogenic fungi examined. With fungal growth measured as standardized change in time to half maximum colony diameter, Δτ, overall, HPH-OMWW showed increased bioactivity, as increased mean Δτ from 3.0 to 4.8 days. Principal component analysis highlighted two fungal groups: Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Alternaria alternata, Sclerotium rolfsii, and Rosellinia necatrix, with growth strongly inhibited by the treated OMWWs; and Aspergillus ochraceus and Phaeoacremonium parasiticum, with stimulated growth by the treated OMWWs. As a non-thermal treatment, HPH-OMWW generally shows improved positive effects, which potentially arise from preservation of the phenols.Entities:
Keywords: antifungal activity; fungi; high-pressure of homogenization; olive mill wastewater; thermal treatment
Year: 2017 PMID: 29312216 PMCID: PMC5735108 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02515
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Details of the fungal species used in this study.
| Cerignola, Foggia, Italy | MOR | Carlucci et al., | Aal | ||
| Oil-mill wastewater | Cerignola, Foggia, Italy | MOR | Dept. SAFE | Ang | |
| Soil | Stornarella, Foggia, Italy | MOR | Dept. SAFE | Aoc | |
| Matino, Lecce, Italy | MOR | Dept. SAFE | Cgd | ||
| Matino, Lecce, Italy | MC | Dept. SAFE | Dag | ||
| Presicce, Lecce, Italy | MC | Dept. SAFE | Fx | ||
| Cerignola, Foggia, Italy | MC | Carlucci et al., | Bot | ||
| Soil | Stornarella, Italy | MOR | Dept. SAFE | Pit | |
| Cerignola, Foggia, Italy | MC | Carlucci et al., | Pmp | ||
| Cerignola, Foggia, Italy | MOR | Dept. SAFE | Rnx | ||
| Stornarella, Foggia, Italy | MOR | Dept. SAFE | Sri | ||
| Soil | Stornarella, Foggia, Italy | MOR | Dept. SAFE | Trc |
MC, molecular characterization; MOR, morphological and microscopic characterization; Dept. SAFE, Department of the Science of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Fungi grown on the laboratory media supplemented with either thermal-treated or high-pressure homogenized OMWW.
| 2.07 ± 0.01A | 3.03 ± 0.03B | 6.02 ± 0.16C | 9.05 ± 0.16E | 6.81 ± 0.12C | 7.76 ± 0.08D | 15.97 ± 0.01F | |
| 4.11 ± 0.14A | 4.96 ± 0.29A, B | 5.72 ± 0.27B | 5.69 ± 0.27B | 4.65 ± 0.21A | 9.38 ± 0.22C | 15.97 ± 0.01D | |
| 10.25 ± 0.29D | 8.31 ± 0.21C | 7.12 ± 0.28B | 22.21 ± 0.60 | 5.46 ± 0.16A | 9.85 ± 0.21D | 15.89 ± 0.01E | |
| 2.68 ± 0.10A | 3.99 ± 0.12B | 8.85 ± 0.16C | 16.32 ± 0.40E | 8.51 ± 0.20C | 11.05 ± 0.22D | 22.00 ± 0.10F | |
| 6.49 ± 0.22B | 3.65 ± 0.13A | 4.19 ± 0.08A | 6.47 ± 0.14B | 7.73 ± 0.14C | 10.11 ± 0.21D | 14.03 ± 0.06E | |
| 3.02 ± 0.07B | 1.90 ± 0.01A | 4.07 ± 0.14C | 4.98 ± 0.15D | 6.27 ± 0.24E | 7.44 ± 0.07F | 15.99 ± 0.10G | |
| 2.00 ± 0.01A | 1.78 ± 0.0A3 | 2.03 ± 0.1A | 3.26 ± 0.05B | 5.07 ± 0.25C | 8.06 ± 0.21D | 9.99 ± 0.10E | |
| 5.32 ± 0.38A | 8.28 ± 0.12C | 6.88 ± 0.14A, B | 7.28 ± 0.15B | 7.27 ± 0.12B | 7.26 ± 0.11B | 11.54 ± 0.10D | |
| 10.78 ± 0.14C | 6.96 ± 0.15A | 8.87 ± 0.18B | 14.26 ± 0.71D | 9.14 ± 0.19B | 9.85 ± 0.24B, C | 14.04 ± 0.06D | |
| 3.46 ± 0.02A | 4.84 ± 0.14B | – | – | 7.65 ± 0.16C | 9.9 ± 0.02D | 11.55 ± 0.10E | |
| 1.89 ± 0.01A | 7.54 ± 0.03B | – | – | 7.05 ± 0.14B | 7.51 ± 0.13B | 11.55 ± 0.10C | |
| 1.81 ± 0.02A | 1.87 ± 0.02A | 2.05 ± 0.10A | 2.14 ± 0.10A | 2.93 ± 0.17B | 6.30 ± 0.03C | 15.95 ± 0.01D | |
Data are means ± standard error. The letters indicate the significant differences in each row (one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test, P < 0.05).
No growth.
Multifactorial ANOVA run on the parameter Δτ (prolongation of τ with reference to the PDA positive control; days).
| Intercept | 4478.16 | 1 | 4478.15 | 126769.3 | 0.00 |
| F | 2578.06 | 11 | 234.37 | 6634.5 | 0.00 |
| T | 175.70 | 1 | 175.70 | 4973.9 | 0.00 |
| A | 1931.22 | 2 | 965.61 | 27334.8 | 0.00 |
| F*T | 1263.93 | 11 | 114.90 | 3252.7 | 0.00 |
| F*A | 639.48 | 22 | 29.07 | 822.8 | 0.00 |
| A*T | 72.82 | 2 | 36.41 | 1030.6 | 0.00 |
| F*A*T | 691.42 | 22 | 31.43 | 889.7 | 0.00 |
| Error | 5.09 | 144 | 0.04 |
F, effect of fungal species (Table .
Figure 1Effective hypothesis decomposition of the multifactorial ANOVA. Effects of fungi species (for numbers, see Table 1) (A), and amount added (B) and treatment (C) for thermal-treated OMWW (T) and high-pressure homogenized OMWW (HPH). Vertical bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. The F-test and relative degrees of freedom are given at the top of each panel.
Figure 2Principal Component Analysis run on Δτ values. (A) Projection of variables. Codes indicate percentage addition of thermal-treated OMWW (T) and high-pressure homogenized OMWW (HPH). (B) Projection of cases. For fungal species, see Table 1.