| Literature DB >> 29311975 |
Sebastiaan Dalle1, Lenka Rossmeislova2, Katrien Koppo1.
Abstract
Many physiological changes occur with aging. These changes often, directly or indirectly, result in a deterioration of the quality of life and even in a shortening of life expectancy. Besides increased levels of reactive oxygen species, DNA damage and cell apoptosis, another important factor affecting the aging process involves a systemic chronic low-grade inflammation. This condition has already been shown to be interrelated with several (sub)clinical conditions, such as insulin resistance, atherosclerosis and Alzheimer's disease. Recent evidence, however, shows that chronic low-grade inflammation also contributes to the loss of muscle mass, strength and functionality, referred to as sarcopenia, as it affects both muscle protein breakdown and synthesis through several signaling pathways. Classic interventions to counteract age-related muscle wasting mainly focus on resistance training and/or protein supplementation to overcome the anabolic inflexibility from which elderly suffer. Although the elderly benefit from these classic interventions, the therapeutic potential of anti-inflammatory strategies is of great interest, as these might add up to/support the anabolic effect of resistance exercise and/or protein supplementation. In this review, the molecular interaction between inflammation, anabolic sensitivity and muscle protein metabolism in sarcopenic elderly will be addressed.Entities:
Keywords: NSAID; inflammation; muscle protein metabolism; muscle wasting; protein supplementation; resistance training; sarcopenia
Year: 2017 PMID: 29311975 PMCID: PMC5733049 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.01045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Studies reporting plasma/serum levels of pro-inflammatory markers with aging.
| TNFα | Bruunsgaard et al., | ↑ plasma [TNFα] in elderly (81 years) vs. young adults (19–31 years) |
| Bruunsgaard et al., | ↑ plasma [TNFα] in elderly (>80 years) (2.5 pg/ml) vs. young adults (18–30 years) (1.4 pg/ml) | |
| Paolisso et al., | Significant correlation between age and TNFα ( | |
| Paik et al., | ↑ serum [TNFα] in elderly ♀ (60–79 years) (>9 pg/ml) vs. younger ♀ (30–59 years) (±7 pg/ml) | |
| IL-6 | Wei et al., | ↑ plasma [IL-6] in elderly (55–75 years) ♂ vs. younger (26–54 years) ♂ and significant correlation between age and IL-6 ( |
| Hager et al., | Significant correlation between age and IL-6 ( | |
| McKane et al., | Significant correlation between age and IL-6 in ♀ ( | |
| Checouich et al., | Significant correlation between age and IL-6 in ♀ ( | |
| Cohen et al., | ↑ mean log(IL-6) and median IL-6 levels in elderly >90 years vs. elderly 80–89 years vs. elderly 70–79 years | |
| Harris et al., | ↑ log(IL6) values in elderly >80 years (0.96 ± 0.65 pg/ml) vs. 71–72 years (0.73 ± 0.66 pg/ml) | |
| Ferrucci et al., | ↑ plasma [IL-6] in elderly >75 years (>1.4 pg/ml) vs. young adults (20–39 years) (0.6 pg/ml) | |
| hs-CRP | Ferrucci et al., | ↑ plasma [CRP] in elderly >75 years (>2.6 mg/l) vs. young adults (20–39 years) (1.0 mg/l) |
| Puzianowska-Kuznicka et al., | ↑ plasma [CRP] in elderly >80 years (>2.4 mg/l) vs. elderly 65–69 years (2.2 mg/l) | |
| Paik et al., | ↑ serum [CRP] in elderly ♀ (>50 years) (>1.1 mg/l) vs. younger ♀ (30–59 years) (±0.95 g/l) |
TNFα, tumor necrosis factor α; IL-6, interleukin 6; hs-CRP, high-sensitive C-reactive protein.
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the mechanisms through which LGI may indirectly affect age-related muscle wasting. LGI, low-grade inflammation; AA, amino acid; AT, adipose tissue; MPS, muscle protein synthesis, MPB, muscle protein breakdown. Red lines contribute to the induction of muscle wasting; green lines to the attenuation of muscle wasting. Dashed lines: inhibitory signaling; full lines: stimulatory signaling. Additional to the association between LGI and age-related muscle wasting, the beneficial effects of classic strategies such as exercise and protein supplementation are illustrated.