| Literature DB >> 29311647 |
Kaori Narumi1, Emiko Sato2,3, Takuo Hirose2, Tae Yamamoto2, Takashi Nakamichi2, Mariko Miyazaki2, Hiroshi Sato2,3, Sadayoshi Ito2.
Abstract
(Pro)renin receptor [(P)RR] is expressed in the kidney and is involved in renal injury. Although (P)RR is activated by indoxyl sulfate (IS) and may be related to renal injury, the details remain unclear. We used mouse mesangial cell line SV40 MES13 to investigate the association of (P)RR with mesangial fibrosis or expansion. Furthermore, we examined the correlation between serum soluble (P)RR [s(P)RR] and various laboratory data including serum IS, a uremic toxin that induces renal fibrosis through (P)RR, and pathological indices in chronic kidney disease and particularly in IgA nephropathy patients. In vitro study using SV40 MES13 cells revealed that (P)RR expression significantly increased in the presence of IS. IS stimulated the fibrotic factors' expression, which was significantly suppressed by (P)RR knockdown. Moreover, it significantly increased the expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 via the ERK1/2 pathway. In addition, the s(P)RR level significantly correlated with serum IS and mesangial injury markers in our patients. Our results suggest that (P)RR is associated with mesangial fibrosis and matrix expansion through the IS-(P)RR-ERK1/2 pathway. Clinically, s(P)RR may be a biomarker of mesangial fibrosis and matrix expansion.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29311647 PMCID: PMC5758707 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18314-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(A) (P)RR protein expression in SV40 MES13 cells assessed by western blot analysis. (B and C) SV40 MES13 cells were incubated with the indicated concentration of IS for 24 h (B) or 48 h (C). Mean ± SE (n = 6). ctl, control. *P < 0.05, by the Tukey–Kramer test. (C) SV40 MES13 cells were incubated with other uremic toxins for 48 h. Mean ± SE (n = 4). ctl, control. (E) Cell number after 250 µM IS stimulation (solid line) or 50 mM Tris-HCl incubation [control (ctl); dotted line] for the indicated periods. Mean ± SE (n = 6). (F) Cell viability of SV40 MES13 cells incubated with 250 µM IS assessed by the 3-(4,5-di-methylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay (n = 6). Values are presented as the median (central line), interquartile range (box) and range (bars). NS, not significant, vs. control (ctl) by the Student’s t-test.
Figure 2Immunofluorescence of (P)RR in SV40 MES13 cells. SV40 MES13 cells were stained with a (P)RR-specific antibody (red) and the nuclear stain, 4,5-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, blue). Left: low-power field, Middle: high-power field, Right: bright field. (A) Cells after 50 mM Tris-HCl stimulation for 48 h as a control. (B) Cells after 250 µM IS stimulation for 48 h. (C) Negative control. Scale bars, 20 µm (low-power field) and 5 µm (high-power field and bright field).
Figure 3(A–C) Protein expression of type IV collagen (A), TGF-β (B) and fibronectin (C) in SV40 MES13 cells transfected with (P)RR small interfering RNA (siRNA) or nontargeting siRNA (scRNA) (n = 4 in each group). Cells were stimulated with 250 µM IS or 50 mM Tris-HCl (ctl) for 48 h. Mean ± SE (n = 4). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, by the Tukey–Kramer test. (D) (P)RR expression in SV40 MES13 cells transfected with (P)RR siRNA or scRNA. Mean ± SE (n = 4). *P < 0.05 compared with scRNA by the Student’s t-test. (E) Cell viability of SV40 MES13 cells treated with (P)RR siRNA or scRNA by the 3-(4,5-di-methylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay (n = 6). Values are presented as the median (central line), interquartile range (box), and range (bars). NS, not significant, by the Student’s t-test.
Figure 4(A and B) mRNA expression of Mmp9 (A) and Timp1 (B) in SV40 MES13 cells. (C and D) Immunoblotting of MMP9 (C) and TIMP1 (D). Cells were stimulated with 250 µM IS or 50 mM Tris-HCl (ctl) for 48 h. Mean ± SE (n = 4). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, A and B were examined by the Student’s t-test. C and D were examined by the Tukey–Kramer test.
Figure 5(A) Representative immunoblotting of phospho-ERK1/2 (pERK1/2) and total ERK1/2. (B) ERK1/2 phosphorylation by 250 µM IS stimulation was decreased in SV40 MES13 with U0126 (ERK1/2 specific inhibitor). Mean ± SE (n = 4). **P < 0.01, compared with control by the Student t-test. Cells were stimulated with 250 µM IS. (C and D) Immunoblotting of MMP9 (C) and TIMP1 (D). Cells were stimulated with 250 µM IS or 50 mM Tris-HCl (ctl) for 48 h after treatment with U0126. Mean ± SE (n = 4). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, by the Tukey–Kramer test.
Subjects’ pathological diagnosis.
| Pathological diagnosis | number |
|---|---|
| IgA nephropathy | 55 |
| Membranous nephropathy | 9 |
| Lupus nephritis | 7 |
| Diabetic glomerulosclerosis | 5 |
| Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis | 5 |
| Nephrosclerosis | 4 |
| Crescentic glomerulonephritis | 4 |
| Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis | 3 |
| Tubulointerstitial nephritis | 3 |
| Endocapillary glomerulonephritis | 2 |
| Renal amyloidosis | 2 |
| Acute tubular necrosis | 1 |
| Total | 100 |
Subjects’ characteristics in CKD.
| patients (n = 100) | |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 50.4 ± 19.1 |
| Men (%) | 55 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.6 ± 4.0 |
| DM (%) | 14 |
| Antihypertensive medication (%) | 45 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 125.1 ± 18.2 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 74.3 ± 12.5 |
| RAS inhibitor (%) | 36 |
|
| |
| Cr (mg/dL) | 1.1 ± 1.2 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 71.5 ± 30.8 |
| UP (g/gCr) | 2.3 ± 3.5 |
|
| |
| s(P)RR (ng/mL) | 13.9 ± 3.9 |
| IS (μg/mL) | 1.3 ± 1.4 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
All parameters were measured at the renal biopsy.
BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes mellitus; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; RAS, renin angiotensin system; Cr, creatinine;
eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; UP, urine protein.
Subjects’ characteristics in IgA nephropathy.
| patients (n = 55) | |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 47.0 ± 19.2 |
| Men (%) | 54.5 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.3 ± 4.1 |
| DM (%) | 7.3 |
| Antihypertensive medication (%) | 38.2 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 122.5 ± 15.5 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 72.7 ± 11.2 |
| RAS inhibitor (%) | 39.4 |
|
| |
| Cr (mg/dL) | 0.88 ± 0.37 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 77.3 ± 27.6 |
| UP (g/gCr) | 1.1 ± 2.1 |
|
| |
| Oxford classification | |
| M1 (%) | 14.5 |
| E1 (%) | 5.5 |
| S1 (%) | 60 |
| T1 + T2 (%)* | 21.8 |
|
| |
| s(P)RR (ng/mL) | 13.55 ± 4.38 |
| IS (μg/mL) | 1.25 ± 0.97 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
All parameters were measured at the renal biopsy.
BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes mellitus; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; RAS, renin angiotensin system; Cr, creatinine;
eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; UP, urine protein;
M1, mesangial hypercellularity; E1, endocapillary hypercellularity; S1, segmental sclerosis; T1 + T2, tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis >25%;
IGL, index of glomerular lesion; s(P)RR, soluble (pro)renin receptor; IS, indoxyl sulfate.
*Because the number of T score positive subjects (T1: n = 7, T2: n = 5) was limited, we performed an association study according to the presence (T1 + T2) or absence (T0) of tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis.
Correlations between s(P)RR and the MEST score in the Oxford Classification.
| Histopathological change | s(P)RR (ng/mL) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Mesangial hypercellularity | |||
| M0 (n = 47) | 13.06 ± 4.03 | ||
| M1 (n = 8) | 16.46 ± 5.47 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Endocapillary hypercellularity | |||
| E0 (n = 52) | 13.30 ± 4.20 | ||
| E1 (n = 3) | 17.78 ± 6.48 | 0.09 | 0.21 |
| Segmental glomerulosclerosis/adhesion | |||
| S0 (n = 22) | 11.55 ± 2.84 | ||
| S1 (n = 33) | 14.89 ± 4.74 | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Tubular atrophy/Interstitial fibrosis | |||
| T0 (n = 43) | 12.92 ± 4.00 | ||
| T1 + T2 (n = 12) | 15.83 ± 5.10 | 0.04 | 0.42 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Multivariable was adjusted for age, gender, body mass index and diabetes.
Figure 6(A) Relationship between IGL levels and serum s(P)RR. Subjects were divided into four groups based on quartiles of IGL levels. The quartile ranges were: Q1, <1.2 (n = 14); Q2, 1.2–1.5 (n = 14); Q3, 1.5–1.8 (n = 13); Q4, ≥1.8 (n = 14). Mean ± SD (n = 55). The Kruscal-Wallis test was used (P = 0.001). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, by the the Steel–Dwass test. (B) Relationship between IS levels and serum s(P)RR. Subjects were divided into four groups based on quartiles of IS levels. The quartile ranges were: Q1, <0.74 (n = 14); Q2, 0.74–1.08 (n = 14); Q3, 1.08–1.62 (n = 14); Q4, ≥1.62 μg/mL (n = 13). Mean ± SD (n = 55). The Kruscal-Wallis test was used (P = 0.03). *P < 0.05, by the Steel–Dwass test.