Literature DB >> 29311501

Retrospective clinical evaluation of posterior monolithic zirconia restorations after 1 to 3.5 years of clinical service.

Hiroto Gunge1, Yoichiro Ogino1, Masafumi Kihara1, Yoshihiro Tsukiyama2, Kiyoshi Koyano1.   

Abstract

This retrospective study analyzed clinical outcomes of monolithic zirconia restorations (MZRs) and factors related to restoration success. Patient records were searched to identify those provided MZRs (Cercon ht) for premolars or molars between April 2012 and March 2016. All MZRs were placed according to a standardized protocol. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess MZR performance and failure after recall appointments at 1 year or later. In total, 101 patients received 148 MZRs. Mean duration of follow-up was 25.0 ± 9.9 months. Six MZRs required replacement: three because of pulpal complications, one because of root fracture of an abutment tooth, one because of restoration fracture, and one because the tooth was used as an abutment tooth for a fixed partial denture after root fracture of an adjacent tooth. The cumulative MZR survival (success) rate at 3.5 years was 91.5% (95% confidence interval, 82.1% to 100%). The findings of this short-term retrospective study indicate that posterior MZRs are a therapeutic option for certain patients. In addition, several clinical procedures contribute to MZR success, including preparation design and occlusal and adhesive surface treatments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  monolithic zirconia restoration; preparation design; surface treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29311501     DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.17-0176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Sci        ISSN: 1343-4934            Impact factor:   1.556


  6 in total

Review 1.  Monolithic Zirconia: An Update to Current Knowledge. Optical Properties, Wear, and Clinical Performance.

Authors:  Eleana Kontonasaki; Athanasios E Rigos; Charithea Ilia; Thomas Istantsos
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-02

2.  Fracture Resistance of Sintered Monolithic Zirconia Dioxide in Different Thermal Units.

Authors:  Andrea Ordoñez Balladares; Cristian Abad-Coronel; Joao Carlos Ramos; Benjamín José Martín Biedma
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Evaluation of Tensile Bond Strength between Self-Adhesive Resin Cement and Surface-Pretreated Zirconia.

Authors:  Mijoo Kim; Reuben H Kim; Samuel C Lee; Thomas K Lee; Marc Hayashi; Bo Yu; Deuk-Won Jo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  The effect of aging on the fracture resistance of different types of screw-cement-retained implant-supported zirconia-based restorations.

Authors:  Safoora Sahebi; Rashin Giti; Arian Sherafati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Randomized clinical trial comparing monolithic and veneered zirconia three-unit posterior fixed partial dentures in a complete digital flow: three-year follow-up.

Authors:  Paula Pontevedra; Carlos Lopez-Suarez; Veronica Rodriguez; Jesus Pelaez; Maria J Suarez
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Third-Generation Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Fabricated with Complete Digital Workflow: Two-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Mustafa Gseibat; Pablo Sevilla; Carlos Lopez-Suarez; Verónica Rodríguez; Jesús Peláez; María J Suárez
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.