| Literature DB >> 29311492 |
Takahiro Ushigusa1,2, Yoshiyuki Koyama1,3, Tomoko Ito1,3, Kenichi Watanabe4, James K Chambers4, Aya Hasegawa1, Kazuyuki Uchida4, Ryoji Kanegi1, Shingo Hatoya1, Toshio Inaba1, Kikuya Sugiura1.
Abstract
By using a complex of DNA, polyethylenimine and chondroitin sulfate, the in vivo transfection of early secretory antigenic target-6 (ESAT-6) gene into tumor cells was found to cause significant suppression of the tumor growth. In order to apply the method in clinical cancer treatment in dogs and cats, mechanisms underlying the suppressive effects were investigated in a tumor-bearing mouse model. The transfection efficiency was only about 10%, but the transfection of ESAT-6 DNA nevertheless induced systemic immune responses against ESAT-6. By triple injection of ESAT-6 DNA at three day intervals, the tumor was significantly reduced and almost disappeared by 5 days after the start of treatment, and did not increase for more than 15 days after the final treatment. In the immunohistochemistry, a larger number of dendritic cells (DCs)/macrophages expressing ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 and CD3+ T cells was observed in tumors treated with ESAT-6 DNA, and their population further increased significantly by day 5. Moreover, the amount of tumor necrosis factor, which is an apoptosis-inducing factor produced mainly by DCs/macrophages, was greater in the ESAT-6 DNA treated tumors than in controls, and increased with repeat of the treatment. These results indicate that in vivo transfection of ESAT-6 DNA into tumor cells elicits significant inhibition of tumor growth by inducing potent activity of innate immunity mediated by DCs/macrophages, which may be followed by adaptive immunity against tumor associated antigens, elicited by the costimulation with ESAT-6 antigen.Entities:
Keywords: dendritic cells/macrophages; early secretory antigenic target-6; gene therapy; innate immunity; tumor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29311492 PMCID: PMC5836752 DOI: 10.1292/jvms.17-0466
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Med Sci ISSN: 0916-7250 Impact factor: 1.267
Fig. 1.Transfection efficiency of the DNA/PEI/CS complex. The GFP-DNA/PEI/CS complex was injected into tumors of the B16 melanoma cells growing in B6 mice. Two days after injection, tumors were collected and tested for transfection efficiency. As a control, PBS was injected into tumors. Appearance of GFP expression on fluorescence microscopy. A bar in the figure is 10 µm. (A), and the efficiency of transfection by the DNA/PEI/CS complex (B) is shown. Experiments were performed using 3 mice in each group. The result is expressed as mean ± SEM. Parameters were compared using Student’s t test.
Fig. 2.Effect of ESAT-6 DNA transfection on the immune response against ESAT-6 antigen. ESAT-6-DNA/CS/PEI complex or PBS was injected into tumors on day 0 and day 3. Peripheral blood was collected from injected mice on day 5. Responses of the blood cells against the ESAT-6 antigen was examined by measuring the IFNγ produced. Closed bars show results for the group injected with the ESAT-6-DNA/PEI/CS complex. Experiments were performed using 4 mice in each group. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Parameters were compared using Student’s t test.
Fig. 3.Effect of ESAT-6 DNA transfection on tumor growth. The ESAT-6-DNA/PEI/CS complex or PBS was injected into B16 tumors in B6 mice on day 0, day 3 and day 6 (indicated by arrowhead). The tumor size was measured after the start of the treatments. Experiments were performed using 5 mice in each group. The result is expressed as mean ± SEM. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs PBS. Parameters were compared using Student’s t-test.
Fig. 4.Effect of ESAT-6 DNA transfection on the infiltration of immune cells in the tumor. The ESAT-6-DNA/CS/PEI complex or PBS was injected into the tumors on day 0 and day 3. Tumors were collected on day 1 or day 5 and were used for immunohistochemical staining using antibodies against the indicated immune cell marker. Representative results are shown for the day 5 tumor.
Fig. 6. Effect of ESAT-6 DNA transfection on the infiltration of immune cells in the tumor. The ESAT-6-DNA/CS/PEI complex or PBS was injected as described in the caption of Fig. 4, and the tumors were collected. The tumor volume (A) and results of immunohistochemical staining against the indicated antigens (B−D) are shown. Open bars show results for the PBS-injected group. Closed bars show results for the ESAT-6 DNA-injected group. Experiments were performed using 4 mice in each group. Results were expressed as mean ± SEM. Parameters were compared using the Tukey-Kramer test.
Fig. 5.Magnified pictures of the Iba-1staining in Fig. 4 were shown.
Fig. 7.Effect of ESAT-6 DNA transfection on cytokine production in the tumor. The ESAT-6-DNA/CS/PEI complex or PBS was injected every other day. The tumors were collected on the day after the second or fifth injection. The indicated cytokines in lysate of the tumors are quantified by flow cytometry as described in the MATERIALS AND METHODS section. The experiments were repeated and reproducible results were obtained. Results are expressed as means of two experiments.