Literature DB >> 29311279

A Robust CRISPR Interference Gene Repression System in Pseudomonas.

Sue Zanne Tan1, Christopher R Reisch2, Kristala L J Prather3.   

Abstract

Pseudomonas spp. are widely used model organisms in different areas of research. Despite the relevance of Pseudomonas in many applications, the use of protein depletion tools in this host remains limited. Here, we developed the CRISPR interference system for gene repression in Pseudomonas spp. using a nuclease-null Streptococcus pasteurianus Cas9 variant (dead Cas9, or dCas9). We demonstrate a robust and titratable gene depletion system with up to 100-fold repression in β-galactosidase activity in P. aeruginosa and 300-fold repression in pyoverdine production in Pseudomonas putida This inducible system enables the study of essential genes, as shown by ftsZ depletions in P. aeruginosa, P. putida, and Pseudomonas fluorescens that led to phenotypic changes consistent with depletion of the targeted gene. Additionally, we performed the first in vivo characterization of protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) site preferences of S. pasteurianus dCas9 and identified NNGCGA as a functional PAM site that resulted in repression efficiencies comparable to the consensus NNGTGA sequence. This discovery significantly expands the potential genomic targets of S. pasteurianus dCas9, especially in GC-rich organisms.IMPORTANCEPseudomonas spp. are prevalent in a variety of environments, such as the soil, on the surface of plants, and in the human body. Although Pseudomonas spp. are widely used as model organisms in different areas of research, existing tools to deplete a protein of interest in these organisms remain limited. We have developed a robust and inducible gene repression tool in P. aeruginosa, P. putida, and P. fluorescens using the Streptococcus pasteurianus dCas9. This method of protein depletion is superior to existing methods, such as promoter replacements and addition of degradation tags, because it does not involve genomic modifications of the target protein, is titratable, and is capable of repressing multiple genes simultaneously. This gene repression system now enables easy depletion of specific proteins in Pseudomonas, accelerating the study and engineering of this widely used model organism.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPRi; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas fluorescens; Pseudomonas putida; gene repression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29311279      PMCID: PMC5847647          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00575-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  35 in total

1.  Promoters largely determine the efficiency of repressor action.

Authors:  M Lanzer; H Bujard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The effect of the lacY gene on the induction of IPTG inducible promoters, studied in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas fluorescens.

Authors:  L H Hansen; S Knudsen; S J Sørensen
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Induction and general properties of beta-galactosidase and beta-galactoside permease in Pseudomonas BAL-31.

Authors:  C Hidalgo; J Reyes; R Goldschmidt
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  A 10-min method for preparation of highly electrocompetent Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells: application for DNA fragment transfer between chromosomes and plasmid transformation.

Authors:  Kyoung-Hee Choi; Ayush Kumar; Herbert P Schweizer
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 2.363

5.  The arginine regulatory protein mediates repression by arginine of the operons encoding glutamate synthase and anabolic glutamate dehydrogenase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Shehab Hashim; Dong-Hyeon Kwon; Ahmed Abdelal; Chung-Dar Lu
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  A Pseudomonas putida strain genetically engineered for 1,2,3-trichloropropane bioremediation.

Authors:  Ghufrana Samin; Martina Pavlova; M Irfan Arif; Christiaan P Postema; Jiri Damborsky; Dick B Janssen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  H-NS family members function coordinately in an opportunistic pathogen.

Authors:  Sandra Castang; Heather R McManus; Keith H Turner; Simon L Dove
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Siderophore-mediated signaling regulates virulence factor production in Pseudomonasaeruginosa.

Authors:  Iain L Lamont; Paul A Beare; Urs Ochsner; Adriana I Vasil; Michael L Vasil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9.

Authors:  F Ann Ran; Le Cong; Winston X Yan; David A Scott; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Andrea J Kriz; Bernd Zetsche; Ophir Shalem; Xuebing Wu; Kira S Makarova; Eugene V Koonin; Phillip A Sharp; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Circular polymerase extension cloning of complex gene libraries and pathways.

Authors:  Jiayuan Quan; Jingdong Tian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  25 in total

1.  A Xylose-Inducible Expression System and a CRISPR Interference Plasmid for Targeted Knockdown of Gene Expression in Clostridioides difficile.

Authors:  Ute Müh; Anthony G Pannullo; David S Weiss; Craig D Ellermeier
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Bacterial CRISPR screens for gene function.

Authors:  Horia Todor; Melanie R Silvis; Hendrik Osadnik; Carol A Gross
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 7.934

3.  H-NS Family Members MvaT and MvaU Regulate the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type III Secretion System.

Authors:  Emily A Williams McMackin; Anne E Marsden; Timothy L Yahr
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  Marine fungal metabolites as a source of drug leads against aquatic pathogens.

Authors:  Hui-Fang Du; Ya-Hui Zhang; Miao Zhang; Qing-Ai Liu; Hua-Jie Zhu; Fei Cao
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  CRISPR-Based Approaches for Gene Regulation in Non-Model Bacteria.

Authors:  Stephanie N Call; Lauren B Andrews
Journal:  Front Genome Ed       Date:  2022-06-23

Review 6.  Applications of CRISPR/Cas System to Bacterial Metabolic Engineering.

Authors:  Suhyung Cho; Jongoh Shin; Byung-Kwan Cho
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Synthetic CRISPR-Cas gene activators for transcriptional reprogramming in bacteria.

Authors:  Chen Dong; Jason Fontana; Anika Patel; James M Carothers; Jesse G Zalatan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Enabling genetic analysis of diverse bacteria with Mobile-CRISPRi.

Authors:  Jason M Peters; Byoung-Mo Koo; Ramiro Patino; Gary E Heussler; Cameron C Hearne; Jiuxin Qu; Yuki F Inclan; John S Hawkins; Candy H S Lu; Melanie R Silvis; M Michael Harden; Hendrik Osadnik; Joseph E Peters; Joanne N Engel; Rachel J Dutton; Alan D Grossman; Carol A Gross; Oren S Rosenberg
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 17.745

Review 9.  CRISPR-Cas9/Cas12a biotechnology and application in bacteria.

Authors:  Ruilian Yao; Di Liu; Xiao Jia; Yuan Zheng; Wei Liu; Yi Xiao
Journal:  Synth Syst Biotechnol       Date:  2018-10-03

10.  CRISPR/Cas9-based Genome Editing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Cytidine Deaminase-Mediated Base Editing in Pseudomonas Species.

Authors:  Weizhong Chen; Ya Zhang; Yifei Zhang; Yishuang Pi; Tongnian Gu; Liqiang Song; Yu Wang; Quanjiang Ji
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2018-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.