Klaus B von Pressentin1, Robert J Mash2, Laurel Baldwin-Ragaven3, Roelf Petrus Gerhardus Botha4, Indiran Govender5, Wilhelm Johannes Steinberg6, Tonya M Esterhuizen7. 1. Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa kvonpressentin@sun.ac.za. 2. Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa. 3. Department of Family Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. 4. Department of Family Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. 5. Family Medicine, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa. 6. Family Medicine, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa. 7. Biostatistics Unit, Centre for Evidence-based Health Care, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Evidence of the influence of family physicians on health care is required to assist managers and policy makers with human resource planning in Africa. The international argument for family physicians derives mainly from research in high-income countries, so this study aimed to evaluate the influence of family physicians on the South African district health system. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study in 7 South African provinces, comparing 15 district hospitals and 15 community health centers (primary care facilities) with family physicians and the same numbers without family physicians. Facilities with and without family physicians were matched on factors such as province, setting, and size. RESULTS: Among district hospitals, those with family physicians generally scored better on indicators of health system performance and clinical processes, and they had significantly fewer modifiable factors associated with pediatric mortality (mean, 2.2 vs 4.7, P =.049). In contrast, among community health centers, those with family physicians generally scored more poorly on indicators of health system performance and clinical processes, with significantly poorer mean scores for continuity of care (2.79 vs 3.03; P =.03) and coordination of care (3.05 vs 3.51; P =.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, having family physicians on staff was associated with better indicators of performance and processes in district hospitals but not in community health centers. The latter was surprising and is inconsistent with the global literature, suggesting that further research is needed on the influence of family physicians at the primary care level.
PURPOSE: Evidence of the influence of family physicians on health care is required to assist managers and policy makers with human resource planning in Africa. The international argument for family physicians derives mainly from research in high-income countries, so this study aimed to evaluate the influence of family physicians on the South African district health system. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study in 7 South African provinces, comparing 15 district hospitals and 15 community health centers (primary care facilities) with family physicians and the same numbers without family physicians. Facilities with and without family physicians were matched on factors such as province, setting, and size. RESULTS: Among district hospitals, those with family physicians generally scored better on indicators of health system performance and clinical processes, and they had significantly fewer modifiable factors associated with pediatric mortality (mean, 2.2 vs 4.7, P =.049). In contrast, among community health centers, those with family physicians generally scored more poorly on indicators of health system performance and clinical processes, with significantly poorer mean scores for continuity of care (2.79 vs 3.03; P =.03) and coordination of care (3.05 vs 3.51; P =.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, having family physicians on staff was associated with better indicators of performance and processes in district hospitals but not in community health centers. The latter was surprising and is inconsistent with the global literature, suggesting that further research is needed on the influence of family physicians at the primary care level.
Authors: James C Martin; Robert F Avant; Marjorie A Bowman; John R Bucholtz; John R Dickinson; Kenneth L Evans; Larry A Green; Douglas E Henley; Warren A Jones; Samuel C Matheny; Janice E Nevin; Sandra L Panther; James C Puffer; Richard G Roberts; Denise V Rodgers; Roger A Sherwood; Kurt C Stange; Cynthia W Weber Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2004 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Bongani M Mayosi; Joy E Lawn; Ashley van Niekerk; Debbie Bradshaw; Salim S Abdool Karim; Hoosen M Coovadia Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robert L Phillips; Stacy Brundgardt; Sarah E Lesko; Nathan Kittle; Jason E Marker; Michael L Tuggy; Michael L Lefevre; Jeffrey M Borkan; Frank V Degruy; Glenn A Loomis; Nathan Krug Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Kéfilath Bello; Jan De Lepeleire; Jeff Kabinda M; Samuel Bosongo; Jean-Paul Dossou; Evelyn Waweru; Ludwig Apers; Marcel Zannou; Bart Criel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-10-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Klaus B von Pressentin; Robert J Mash; Laurel Baldwin-Ragaven; Roelf Petrus Gerhardus Botha; Indiran Govender; Wilhelm Johannes Steinberg; Tonya M Esterhuizen Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Maaike Flinkenflögel; Vincent Sethlare; Vincent Kalumire Cubaka; Mpundu Makasa; Abraham Guyse; Jan De Maeseneer Journal: Hum Resour Health Date: 2020-04-03