| Literature DB >> 29310577 |
Xiaoshan Guan1, Xiaoping Mu2, Wenjing Ji3,4,5, Chunlei Yuan6, Ping He7, Lian Zhang8, Yanfen Huang2, Juan Li1, Jianfeng Chen9, Huamin Zhong1, Shuyin Pang1, Nan Tan9, Qiulian Deng1, Kankan Gao1, Yu-Ping Huang10, Chien-Yi Chang10, Haiying Liu11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in infants in both developed and developing countries. To our knowledge, only a few studies have been reported the clinical features, treatment and outcomes of the GBS disease in China. The severity of neonatal GBS disease in China remains unclear. Population-based surveillance in China is therefore required.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance; Group B Streptococcus; Infants; Multilocus sequence type (MLST); Neonatal infections; Serotype
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29310577 PMCID: PMC5759214 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2811-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Demographics of infants with invasive GBS infection in urban area of South China, 2011–2014
| Early-onset Disease ( | Late-onset Disease ( | Total ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (female/male) | 16/33 | 12/9 | 28/42 |
| Preterm (gestational age < 37 weeks) | 7 (14.3%) | 4 (19.0%) | 11 (15.7%) |
| Low birth weight (<2500 g) | 5 (10.2%) | 4 (19.0%) | 9 (12.9%) |
| Bacterial isolation site | |||
| Blood alone | 46 (93.9%) | 16 (76.2%) | 62 (88.6%) |
| CSF+blooda | 2 (4.1%) | 0 | 2 (2.9%) |
| CSF alone | 1 (2.0%) | 5 (23.8%)b | 6 (8.6%) |
| Incidence (per 1000 live births,95%CI) | 0.39 (0.29–0.51) | 0.16 (0.11–0.25) | 0.55 (0.44–0.69) |
| Clinical outcomes | |||
| Died | 4 (8.2%) | 1 (4.8%) | 5 (7.1%) |
| Survived with sequelae | 2 (4.1%) | 3 (14.3%) | 5 (7.1%) |
aCSF cerebrospinal fluid;
bCompared with early-onset disease, Fisher exact test, X2 = 6.3281, P = 0.0119
Fig. 1Clinical outcomes of culture-confirmed GBS cases identified from infants <3 months born in the three studying hospitals. This figure indicates number of GBS cases was identified from 127,206 live births, mortality rate of EOD and LOD, and proportion of cases with neurological sequelae, respectively. EOD, early-onset disease; LOD, late-onset disease
Fig. 2Incidence of invasive group B streptococcal disease in infants younger than three months in South China, 2011–2014. This figure describes the overall incidence of invasive GBS infection during 2011–2014, and incidence for EOD and LOD, respectively. It shows the increase for EOD from 2011 to 2014 was significant, while the incidence of LOD was more stable
Serotyping analysis of invasive GBS infection in urban area of South China, 2011–2014
| Early-onset Disease ( | Late-onset Disease ( | Totala( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (female/male) | 6/16 | 25/21 | 31/37 |
| Bacterial isolation site | |||
| Blood | 20 (90.9%) | 28 (60.9%) | 48 (70.6%) |
| CSFb | 2 (9.1%) | 18 (39.1%) | 20 (29.4%) |
| Serotypec | |||
| Ia | 1 (4.5%) | 1 (2.2%) | 2 (2.9%) |
| Ib | 5 (22.7) | 5 (10.9%) | 10 (14.7%) |
| III | 15 (68.2%) | 38 (82.6%) | 53 (77.9%) |
| V | 1 (4.5%) | 2 (4.3%) | 3 (4.4%) |
aThe analyzed 68 GBS isolates were collected during study period, including from cases born in the studying hospitals or born elsewhere but transferred to the studying hospitals for medical treatment after delivery
bCSF cerebrospinal fluid
cCompared with early-onset disease, serotypes distribution for late-onset disease was not statistically different (X2 = 2.1062, P = 0.5506)
Fig. 3Distribution of group B streptococcus serotypes in infants younger than three months with invasive infection. This figure shows GBS serotype distribution among study infants. Serotype III was the most commonly identified serotype, followed by Ib, V, and Ia
Multi-locus sequence typing of invasive GBS infection in urban area of South China, 2011–2014
| Serotype | Total No | Sequence Type | Isolates number |
|---|---|---|---|
| III | 53 | ST-17 | 43 |
| ST-19 | 4 | ||
| ST-399 | 2 | ||
| ST-27 | 1 | ||
| ST-55 | 1 | ||
| ST-562 | 1 | ||
| ST-651 | 1 | ||
| Ib | 10 | ST-12 | 5 |
| ST-10 | 1 | ||
| ST-23 | 1 | ||
| ST-357 | 2 | ||
| ST-579 | 1 | ||
| V | 3 | ST-1 | 3 |
| Ia | 2 | ST-23 | 2 |
Antibiotic resistance of invasive GBS isolates in different serotypes and STs
| Serotypes | Sequence types | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ia ( | Ib ( | III ( | V ( | Total ( | ST-17 ( | Non-ST-17 ( | |
| Penicillin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ceftriaxone | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vancomycin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Linezolid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ofloxacin | 0 | 1 (10.0%) | 3 (5.7%) | 0 | 4 (5.9%) | 0 | 4 (16.0%)a |
| Sulfamethoxazole | 0 | 1 (10.0%) | 1 (1.9%) | 0 | 2(2.9%) | 1 (2.3%) | 1 (4.0%) |
| Tetracycline | 2 (100.0%) | 9 (90.0%) | 51 (96.2%) | 3 (100.0%) | 65 (95.6%) | 42 (97.7%) | 23 (92.0%) |
| Erythromycin | 1 (50%) | 5 (50%) | 31 (58.5%) | 2 (66.7%) | 39(57.4%) | 26 (60.5%) | 11 (44.0%) |
| Clindamycin | 0 | 5 (50%) | 28 (52.8%) | 2 (66.7%) | 35(51.5%) | 25 (58.1%) | 9 (36.0%) |
aCompared to ST-17 isolates, X2 = 4.706, P = 0.030, 3/4(75.0%) ST-19 were resistant to ofloxacin