Objective Although nociceptive sensitisation is an important pathophysiological process in migraine and migraine chronification, its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), a pattern-recognition molecule, has a critical role in both neuropathic pain and morphine tolerance. The present study examined whether elements of the TLR4 pathway contribute to hyperalgesia induced by dural inflammation in rats. Methods A rat model of migraine was established by infusing a dural inflammatory soup. A group pretreated with TAK-242 was used to inhibit the activation of TLR4. The protein levels of TLR4 and its downstream molecules in the trigeminal pathway were examined by Western blot and immunofluorescence. The expression of activated microglia and astrocytes was also analysed. Levels of interleukin-1 beta, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results Acute inflammatory soup infusion induced time-dependent facial mechanical hyperalgesia, which was blocked by TAK-242 pretreatment. The inflammatory soup stimulus increased the production of TLR4 downstream molecules and interleukin-1 beta. Higher levels of microglia activation and brain-derived neurotrophic factor release were observed following the administration of the inflammatory soup but were alleviated by TAK-242. Conclusions These data suggest that the TLR4 signalling pathway promotes hyperalgesia induced by acute inflammatory soup delivery by stimulating the production of proinflammatory cytokines and activating microglia.
Objective Although nociceptive sensitisation is an important pathophysiological process in migraine and migraine chronification, its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), a pattern-recognition molecule, has a critical role in both neuropathic pain and morphine tolerance. The present study examined whether elements of the TLR4 pathway contribute to hyperalgesia induced by dural inflammation in rats. Methods A rat model of migraine was established by infusing a dural inflammatory soup. A group pretreated with TAK-242 was used to inhibit the activation of TLR4. The protein levels of TLR4 and its downstream molecules in the trigeminal pathway were examined by Western blot and immunofluorescence. The expression of activated microglia and astrocytes was also analysed. Levels of interleukin-1 beta, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results Acute inflammatory soup infusion induced time-dependent facial mechanical hyperalgesia, which was blocked by TAK-242 pretreatment. The inflammatory soup stimulus increased the production of TLR4 downstream molecules and interleukin-1 beta. Higher levels of microglia activation and brain-derived neurotrophic factor release were observed following the administration of the inflammatory soup but were alleviated by TAK-242. Conclusions These data suggest that the TLR4 signalling pathway promotes hyperalgesia induced by acute inflammatory soup delivery by stimulating the production of proinflammatory cytokines and activating microglia.
Migraineis a prevalent brain disorder with quite high disabling rates, but effective
treatments are limited due to confusion regarding the pathogenesis of the disease.[1,2] During an attack, migraine sufferers may
experience hypersensitivity to external stimuli, such as sound, light, and
movement.[2] Many
patients exhibit allodynia, the perception of pain in response to a normally nonpainful
stimulus, even after the headache phase.[3] Hyperalgesia has been associated with
migraine pathology, such as peripheral and central sensitisation, which is attributed to
neuroinflammation in the trigeminovascular system or the brain stem.[4-6] However, a detailed understanding of the effect of innate immunity in
this process is limited.Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is a pattern-recognition receptor of the innate immune
system[7] and is also
sensitive to endogenous danger-associated molecular patterns released during tissue injury
or stressful events.[8]
Numerous studies have shown that the activation of TLR4 plays an important role in promoting
the expression of proinflammatory products by upregulating nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) in
the immune system as well as interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), tumour necrosis factor-alpha
(TNF-α), and inducible nitric oxide synthases.[8-10] These molecules
further promote the activation of glia and the production of inflammatory cytokines to act
on the nociceptive pathway, resulting in the hyperalgesic state.[11,12]Rodent studies have confirmed that the activation of the TLR4–NF–κB signalling pathway in
the dorsal/trigeminal root ganglia or the spinal dorsal horn induces hyperalgesia in several
animal models of inflammatory or neuropathic pain.[13,14] It is also well accepted that an overdose
of morphine activates TLR4 and increases the production of IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 in
activated glia.[15]
Blocking this pathway can effectively slow the development of morphine tolerance and exert
an analgesic effect.[16,17] Moreover, in our previous
study, TLR4 was involved in the development of hyperalgesia, induced by repeated dural
inflammatory stimulation in rats, as well as systematic rizatriptan overuse (unpublished
results).Based on this evidence, we hypothesised that the activation of the TLR4–NF–κB pathway
promotes hyperalgesia in headache-related pain. Dural infusion of an inflammatory soup (IS),
a mixture of inflammatory mediators, in awake rats has been widely used to study acute or
chronic migraine, as this kind of animal model can not only simulate migraine-related
behaviour but also effectively induce hyperalgesia.[18-20] In the present study, an ISrat model was used to explore whether the
TLR4–NF–κB signalling pathway in the trigeminal ganglion (TG) and trigeminocervical complex
(TCC) participates in the development of cutaneous hypersensitivity. Moreover, a specific
TLR4 inhibitor, TAK-242, was administered to analyse its possible role in regulating
neuroinflammation.
Materials and methods
Animals
Twenty-seven male Sprague–Dawley rats (weight, 190–210 g) were housed individually in a
temperature- and humidity-controlled environment with free access to food and water. A
standard 12-/12-h light/dark cycle, with the lights turned on at 07:00 a.m., was provided.
This study was approved by the Committee on Animal Use for Research and Education of the
Laboratory Animals Centre at Chinese PLA General Hospital (Beijing, China), and it
followed the ethical guidelines for the study of pain in conscious animals.[21] Every effort was made to
minimise any possible suffering by the animals.
Surgical procedure
A cannula was implanted in each rat to carry out the dural infusion, as described
previously.[19]
Briefly, rats were anaesthetised to a deep surgical plane with 3% pentobarbital sodium
(2 mL/kg, i.p.). A plastic cap with a stainless steel inner cannula (C = 1 mm; RWD Life
Science Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China) was implanted in a previously
drilled cranial window aimed at the left frontal bone (1.0 mm in diameter, 1.5 mm beyond
the transverse sinuses, and 1.5 mm left of the superior sagittal sinus) without touching
the meningeal tissue. Two small screws were implanted with dental cement around each
cannula to hold them securely in place. The cannula was sealed with an obturator cap
(G = 0 mm; RWD Life Science) to prevent scar tissue from blocking the inner cannula. All
rats recovered for at least three days before the experimental procedure to ensure that
their sensory thresholds had returned to pre-surgical baselines.
Experimental procedure
All rats were divided into three groups randomly: the control (CON) group, the migraine
model (IS) group, and the TLR4 inhibiting (TAK-242) group. To build the animal model of
migraine, 10 μL of IS consisting of 2 mM histamine, 2 mM serotonin, 2 mM bradykinin, and
0.2 mM prostaglandin E2 in normal saline was applied to each rat via the implanted
cannula. Rats in the CON group received 10 μL of normal saline. To inhibit the effects of
TLR4, TAK-242, a specific TLR4 antagonist, was administered intraperitoneally 1.5 h prior
to the dural IS infusion at a dose of 3 mg/kg (diluted in 1% dimethyl sulphoxide;
Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The vehicle was given in the same way to the rats in the
other two groups.Two sensory tests were conducted to confirm the development of hyperalgesia. Baseline
behavioural responses to facial probing were obtained from all rats prior to drug
administration (baseline) and again after the dural infusion at 1-h intervals for 6 h.
Behavioural responses to a hot plate were determined at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 h
after the dural infusion.After the behavioural tests, all rats were humanely killed, and brain tissue samples were
obtained immediately. Deeply anaesthetised with an intraperitoneal injection of 3%
pentobarbital sodium (2.2 mL/kg), four rats from each group were transcardially perfused
with 200 mL of cold fresh saline, followed by 400 mL of fresh fixative (0.1 M phosphate
buffer containing 4% paraformaldehyde [pH 7.4]). The brain, including the TG, was removed,
post-fixed, and stored until immunofluorescent staining. The other five rats from each
group were perfused through the heart with 200 mL of cold fresh saline, and the caudal
medulla and upper cervical spinal cord were quickly collected on ice. Using a cytoplasmic
and nuclear protein extraction kit (P0027; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Jiangsu
China), the cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins were extracted from tissue samples
immediately and stored at −80°C for Western blot analysis and enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA).
Behavioural test
The facial mechanical withdraw threshold of rats was determined by applying a von Frey
monofilament (North Coast Medical Co., Gilroy, CA, USA) to the periorbital region. Using
an ‘up-down’ method,[22] the nociceptive threshold was defined as the filament weight at which a
rat exhibited a positive response at least three of five applications. However, if no
positive response to the 15 g (peak weight) filament was observed, 15 g was assigned for
the analysis. The hot-plate test was conducted to confirm whether the rats had thermal
allodynia. Each rat was placed on the hot plate (Bioseb, Vitrolles, France) with the
temperature adjusted to 52 ± 0.2°C, and the latency to the first paw licking or withdrawal
was recorded. A cut-off time of 15 s was set to avoid injuring the rats.
ELISA analysis
IL-1β and TNF-α levels in cytoplasmic protein were determined with ELISA kits (R&D
Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In
addition, the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), secreted by
activated microglia was detected by ELISA (Westang, China). Each sample was run in
duplicate, and mean concentrations were calculated and expressed as picograms of antigen
per gram of protein.
Western blot analysis
To confirm the involvement of the TLR4 signalling pathway, the expression of TLR4, and
its downstream molecules, including myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), toll
interleukin-1 receptor domain containing adapter protein-inducing interferon beta (TRIF),
inhibitory nuclear factor-kappa (IκB), and phosphorylated IκB (p-IκB) were detected by
Western blot. NF-κB p65 subunit content in cytoplasmic and nuclear protein was examined.
The expression of ionised calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba-1) and glial fibrillary
acidic protein (GFAP) in cytoplasmic protein was measured to assess the activation of
microglia and astrocytes, respectively. The protein content of the supernatant was
estimated using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (CW0014; Beyotime). Equal amounts
of protein were separated by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
for each assay, as described previously. The loading amount was 15 μg in the GFAP analysis
and 40 μg for all others. After transfer and blocking, the membranes were incubated
overnight at 4°C with diluted primary antibodies for anti-TLR4 (1:2000, sc-293072; Santa
Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-MyD88 (1:1000, ab2064; Abcam, Cambridge,
MA, USA), anti-TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β (TRIF) (1:400, ab13810;
Abcam), anti- IκB (1:100, sc-1643; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-p IκB (1:200, sc-8404;
Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-p65 (1:100, sc-8008; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Iba-1
(1:200, sc-32725; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-GFAP (1:100000, MAB360; Millipore,
Bedford, MA, USA), anti-histone H3 (nuclear inner control, 1:2000, AF0009; Beyotime), and
anti-beta-actin (inner control, 1:4000, AA128; Beyotime). After washing with TBST, the
membranes were incubated with their respective horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary
antibodies (1:5000, ZB-2301/ZB-2305; ZSGB-BIO) for 1 h at room temperature. The
antibody-reactive bands were visualised using enhanced chemiluminescence detection
reagents (P90719; Millipore) and a gel imaging system (Tanon-5200; YPH-BIO). The results
were quantified with Image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD,
USA).
Immunofluorescence assays
The expression of Fos, TLR4, and NF-κB p65 in the TG and the TCC, which is composed of
the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC) and the upper cervical spinal cord (UCSC), was
measured using an immunofluorescence assay. The levels of Iba-1 and GFAP in the TNC and
UCSC were analysed. The fixed samples were embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT Compound (Sakura
Finetek, Torrance, CA, USA) and cut into 20-μm-thick serial sections on a freezing
microtome (CM1850; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). The sections were permeabilised in 0.2%
Triton X-100, blocked with 10% goat serum (ZLI-9005; ZSGB-BIO), and incubated overnight at
4°C with respective diluted primary antibodies for anti-Fos (1:200, ABE457; Millipore),
anti-TLR4 (1:500, sc-293072; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-p65 (1:50, sc-8008; Santa
Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Iba-1 (1:400; Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan), and
anti-GFAP (1:5000, MAB360; Millipore). After washing with 0.01 M phosphate-buffered
saline, the sections were incubated for 2 h in the dark at room temperature with
respective secondary antibodies for anti-mouse-conjugated AlexaFluor594 (1:1000, A-11034;
Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and anti-rabbit-conjugated fluorescein isothiocyanate
(1:1000, A-21424; Thermo Fisher). According to the atlas by Paxinos and Watson,[23] three randomly selected
images at 20× magnification were obtained for each brain region per sample using a
microscope (DP73; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The immunoreactive cells were recognised using
Image J software without identity of the rat, and the average integrated density of three
images was defined as the final result for each one.
Statistical analysis
SPSS 19.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for the statistical analysis,
and Origin 9.1 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA) was used generate the graphs. Levene’s
test for homogeneity was conducted to test the data distributions. Abnormally distributed
data were analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test to determine differences among the
groups. All other data were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the least
significant difference (LSD) t-test (when the variance was regular) or
Dunnett’s T3 test (when the variance was irregular) for comparisons between the groups.
All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and a P value < 0.05 was
considered significant.
Results
Acute dural inflammatory stimulus induces facial, but not hindpaw, allodynia, which
was alleviated by pretreatment of TAK-242
The Kruskal–Wallis test comparing the facial allodynia threshold showed a significant
interaction between group and time (P < 0.05, Figure 1(a)). Post hoc tests showed that rats in the
IS group exhibited significant declines in their periorbital mechanical withdrawal
thresholds compared with those in the CON group beginning during the first hour after the
dural infusion, with the maximum difference at hour 4. Furthermore, this decline was
reversed by the TAK-242 treatment, as rats in the TAK-242 group had a higher withdrawal
threshold than did those in the IS group from hours 2 to 5 (Figure 1(a)). However, no difference was found in paw
licking or withdrawal latency to the hot plate among the three groups (two-way
repeated-measures ANOVA, F0.05, (2,24) = 0.429, P = 0.857; Figure 1(b)).
Figure 1.
The mechanical (a) or thermal (b) withdrawal thresholds of rats during the 6-hour
experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± SD, n = 9. Compared with the CON group,
rats in IS group showed a time-dependent and reversible decline in periorbital
withdrawal thresholds to mechanical stimulus (*P < 0.05), which was alleviated by
TAK-242 pretreatment (#P < 0.05). As for the paw licking or withdrawal latency at
52°C, no significant difference was found among the three groups.
The mechanical (a) or thermal (b) withdrawal thresholds of rats during the 6-hour
experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± SD, n = 9. Compared with the CON group,
rats in IS group showed a time-dependent and reversible decline in periorbital
withdrawal thresholds to mechanical stimulus (*P < 0.05), which was alleviated by
TAK-242 pretreatment (#P < 0.05). As for the paw licking or withdrawal latency at
52°C, no significant difference was found among the three groups.
IS induces higher Fos expression in the trigeminal nociceptive pathway
Fos, a neuronal activity marker, was examined by immunofluorescence in this study to
explore the activation of the trigeminal pathway. Rats in both the IS and TAK-242 groups
showed higher Fos expression in the TG than in the CON group, with the IS group showing
the highest expression level (ANOVA, F0.05, (2,9) = 36.07, P < 0.001; Figure 2(a)). Similar results were
obtained in the TNC (ANOVA, F0.05, (2,9) = 16.97, P = 0.001; Figure 2(b)). A significant increase
in Fos level was observed in the UCSC for the IS group compared with the CON and TAK-242
groups, but no difference was found between the latter two groups (ANOVA, F0.05,
(2,9) = 23.22, P < 0.001; Figure 2(c)).
Figure 2.
The level of Fos in trigeminal ganglion (a), trigeminal nucleus caudalis (b), and
upper cervical spinal cord (c). All values given are the mean ± SD, n = 4.
*P < 0.05 versus control group. #P < 0.05 versus IS group.
The level of Fos in trigeminal ganglion (a), trigeminal nucleus caudalis (b), and
upper cervical spinal cord (c). All values given are the mean ± SD, n = 4.
*P < 0.05 versus control group. #P < 0.05 versus IS group.
The TLR4-NF-κB pathway is involved in the rat model of migraine
No significant difference in TLR4 expression was found among the three groups by Western
blot (ANOVA, F0.05, (2,12) = 0.34, P = 0.718; Figure 3(a)) or by immunofluorescence (ANOVA,
P > 0.05; data not shown, Figure
5 showed the typical immunofluorescence samples). In contrast, MyD88 and TRIF
expression were significantly greater in the TCC of IS-treated rats compared with the
controls (ANOVA, P < 0.05; Figure 3(b)
and (c)), and the high MyD88 expression was blocked by TAK-242 treatment (LSD-t,
P = 0.009). As shown in Figure 4(a) to
(d), NF-κB p65 and p-IκB protein expression increased; accordingly, that of IκB
decreased in rats in the IS group compared with the controls (P < 0.05). Moreover, all
of these changes were blocked by TAK-242 (P < 0.05). The higher expression of NF-κB p65
in trigeminal pathway in IS-treated rats was also proved by immunofluorescence, also
blocked by TAK-242 (ANOVA, P < 0.05; Figure 5).
Figure 3.
The protein levels of TLR4 and its downstream molecules in rats’ medullary and upper
cervical spinal cord. Protein levels of TLR4 (a), MyD88 (b), and TRIF (c) were
analysed by Western blot. Typical Western blot strips obtained were exhibited at the
top of each image, and for all strips, each blot from left to right means sample from
rat in group CON, IS, and TAK-242, respectively. All values given are the mean ± SD,
n = 5. *P < 0.05 versus CON group. #P < 0.05 versus IS group.
Figure 5.
Immunofluorescence of TLR4 and NF-κB p65 expression in the trigeminal pathway. The
typical immunofluorescence samples were presented at the left part of the image, with
the scale bar equalling to 50 μm. The right part showed the statistical results of
NF-κB p65 expression in TG (a), TNC (b), and UCSC (c), respectively. All values given
are the mean ± SD, n = 4. #P < 0.05 versus IS group. TG: trigeminal ganglion; TNC:
trigeminal nucleus caudalis; UCSC: upper cervical spinal cord.
Figure 4.
The protein levels of NF-κB p65 and related molecules in rats’ medullary and upper
cervical spinal cord. Protein levels of IκB (a), p-IκB (b), NF-κB p65 (c), and nuclear
NF-κB p65 (d) were analysed by Western blot. Typical Western blot strips obtained were
exhibited at the top of each image, and for all strips, each blot from left to right
means sample from rat in group CON, IS, and TAK-242, respectively. All values given
are the mean ± SD, n = 5. #P < 0.05 versus IS group.
The protein levels of TLR4 and its downstream molecules in rats’ medullary and upper
cervical spinal cord. Protein levels of TLR4 (a), MyD88 (b), and TRIF (c) were
analysed by Western blot. Typical Western blot strips obtained were exhibited at the
top of each image, and for all strips, each blot from left to right means sample from
rat in group CON, IS, and TAK-242, respectively. All values given are the mean ± SD,
n = 5. *P < 0.05 versus CON group. #P < 0.05 versus IS group.The protein levels of NF-κB p65 and related molecules in rats’ medullary and upper
cervical spinal cord. Protein levels of IκB (a), p-IκB (b), NF-κB p65 (c), and nuclear
NF-κB p65 (d) were analysed by Western blot. Typical Western blot strips obtained were
exhibited at the top of each image, and for all strips, each blot from left to right
means sample from rat in group CON, IS, and TAK-242, respectively. All values given
are the mean ± SD, n = 5. #P < 0.05 versus IS group.Immunofluorescence of TLR4 and NF-κB p65 expression in the trigeminal pathway. The
typical immunofluorescence samples were presented at the left part of the image, with
the scale bar equalling to 50 μm. The right part showed the statistical results of
NF-κB p65 expression in TG (a), TNC (b), and UCSC (c), respectively. All values given
are the mean ± SD, n = 4. #P < 0.05 versus IS group. TG: trigeminal ganglion; TNC:
trigeminal nucleus caudalis; UCSC: upper cervical spinal cord.
IS enhances expression of IL-1β and BDNF, but not TNF-α
Brain concentrations of IL-1β and BDNF increased after the dural IS infusion (ANOVA,
P < 0.05; Figure 6(a) and (c)).
Moreover, TAK-242 blocked the high expression level of IL-1β induced by IS (Dunnett’s T3,
P = 0.005; Figure 6(a)). In
contrast, no obvious change in TNF-α level was detected among the three groups (ANOVA,
F0.05,(2,12) = 0.097, P = 0.908; Figure 6(b)).
Figure 6.
The protein levels of IL-1β (a), TNF-α (b), and BDNF (c) in rat brain by
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All values given are the mean ± SD, n = 5.
#P < 0.05 versus IS group.
The protein levels of IL-1β (a), TNF-α (b), and BDNF (c) in rat brain by
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All values given are the mean ± SD, n = 5.
#P < 0.05 versus IS group.
Microglia, but not astrocytes, are activated by the acute IS infusion
IS-treated rats expressed significantly more Iba-1 in TCC compared with the controls,
which was reversed by TAK-242 (ANOVA, F0.05,(2,12) = 5.725, P = 0.018; Figure 7(a)). Similar data were
obtained by immunofluorescence analysis, as the density of Iba-1 in both TNC and UCSC was
upregulated among rats in the IS group, and this upregulation was fully or partially
blocked by TAK-242 (ANOVA, P < 0.05; Figure 8). No significant difference in GFAP expression was found by either
Western blot (ANOVA, F0.05,(2,12) = 0.554, P = 0.621; Figure 7(b)) or immunofluorescence (ANOVA,
P > 0.05; data not shown, Figure
8 showed the typical immunofluorescence samples).
Figure 7.
Expression of microglia (a) and astrocytes (b) activating marker in rats’ medullary
and upper cervical spinal cord. Protein levels of Iba-1 (ionised calcium-binding
adapter molecule 1) and GFAP (glia fibrillary acidic protein) were analysed by Western
blot. Typical Western blot strips obtained were exhibited at the top of each image,
and for all strips, each blot from left to right means sample from rat in group CON,
IS, and TAK-242, respectively. All values given are the mean ± SD, n = 5. #P < 0.05
versus IS group.
Figure 8.
Immunofluorescence of Iba-1 and GFAP expression in the trigeminal pathway. The
typical immunofluorescence samples were presented at the left part of the image, with
the scale bar equalling to 50 μm. The right part showed the statistical results of
Iba-1 expression in TNC (a) and UCSC (b), respectively. All values given are the
mean ± SD, n = 4. #P < 0.05 versus IS group. TNC: trigeminal nucleus caudalis;
UCSC: upper cervical spinal cord.
Expression of microglia (a) and astrocytes (b) activating marker in rats’ medullary
and upper cervical spinal cord. Protein levels of Iba-1 (ionised calcium-binding
adapter molecule 1) and GFAP (glia fibrillary acidic protein) were analysed by Western
blot. Typical Western blot strips obtained were exhibited at the top of each image,
and for all strips, each blot from left to right means sample from rat in group CON,
IS, and TAK-242, respectively. All values given are the mean ± SD, n = 5. #P < 0.05
versus IS group.Immunofluorescence of Iba-1 and GFAP expression in the trigeminal pathway. The
typical immunofluorescence samples were presented at the left part of the image, with
the scale bar equalling to 50 μm. The right part showed the statistical results of
Iba-1 expression in TNC (a) and UCSC (b), respectively. All values given are the
mean ± SD, n = 4. #P < 0.05 versus IS group. TNC: trigeminal nucleus caudalis;
UCSC: upper cervical spinal cord.
Discussion
The present study tested the hypothesis that the activation of the TLR4–NF–κB signalling
pathway in the trigeminal system contributes to the development of hyperalgesia in migraine.
Our data provide evidence that the activation of the TLR4–NF–κB signalling pathway and
subsequent cytokine release in the medulla and the UCSC play a crucial role in the
development of cutaneous hypersensitivity inIS-treated rats. Moreover, the activation of
microglia induced by dural inflammation was regulated by TLR4.In this study, time-dependent and reversible facial mechanical hyperalgesia due to a dural
IS was successfully established. These responses occurred over several hours following IS,
consistent with previous studies and clinical observations of cutaneous allodynia seen in
patients with migraine.[18,24]
Pretreatment with TAK-242 effectively blocked this hyperalgesia, indicating a crucial role
of TLR4 in the process. In contrast, no significant difference in response to the hot plate
was found after IS delivery, suggesting that hindpaw allodynia had not developed in this
acute dural stimulation model. This is reasonable, as extracephalic allodynia usually occurs
when central sensitisation extends to third-order trigeminal neurons in the thalamus, which
is mostly seen in frequent or chronic migraine.[25]Sensitisation has always been the key point in the pathophysiology of migraine, as well as
other chronic painful conditions.[26] In this study, Fos, an indicator of neuronal excitability, was detected
to examine the activation state of the trigeminal nociceptive pathway. Chemically irritating
the dura activated and sensitised the first-order trigeminovascular neurons of the TG.
Additionally, IS-induced increased expression of Fos was confirmed in second-order neurons
and an important relay station to subcortical structures in nociceptive modulation in the
TCC of rats, indicating the development of central sensitisation.[27] Sensitisation is a physiological process
underlying periorbital cutaneous allodynia, as neurons located in the medullary dorsal horn
receive convergent input from the dura and the cranial skin.[4] Moreover, TAK-242 abolished this IS-induced
high Fos expression in both the TG and TCC, suggesting the involvement of TLR4 in
peripheral/central sensitisation.TLR4is an important mediator of the inflammatory response through recruitment of NF-κB and
downstream gene transcription, including the production of a series of proinflammatory
cytokines such as IL-1β and TNF-α.[28] Prior studies have demonstrated that the expression levels of NF-κB,
IL-1β, and TNF-α increase in the spinal cords of rats with complete Freund’s
adjuvant-induced pain[29] or chronic neuropathic pain.[30] In addition, blocking TLR4 inhibited
expression of its downstream signalling components in the TG alleviated nociceptive
behaviour in a rat acute pulpitis model.[14] In the present study, despite the subtle
change in TLR4 expression, the activation of its signalling pathway was confirmed. Protein
levels of MyD88, TRIF, and NF-κB were upregulated in the cytoplasm of the IS-treated brain.
On the other hand, we also confirmed increased IκB phosphorylation/degradation and enhanced
expression of NF-κB in the nucleus following IS, promoting release of IL-1β. All of these
data support the claim that the activation of the TLR4 signalling pathway promotes the
development of IS-induced hyperalgesia.TLR4is expressed primarily on microglia and to a lesser degree on astrocytes.[28] Inhibiting TLR4 may
decrease the activation of glia and thereby relieve neuropathic pain or morphine
tolerance.[30,31] In the present study, we
also found an increased level of microglia in the TCC following IS and, subsequently, higher
production of BDNF. These data suggest that microglia are also involved in the process of
IS-induced central sensitisation. In contrast, no significant change in astrocyte activation
was found, but this does not exclude the possibility of its role in central sensitisation,
as this kind of glia usually participates in the late phase of the immune response.TAK-242, a specific inhibitor of TLR4 that can pass through the brain–blood barrier, exerts
analgesic effects in several painful conditions.[29,30] In this study, pretreatment with TAK-242
not only inhibited IS-induced upregulation of molecules downstream of TLR4, including MyD88,
TRIF, and NF-κB, but also decreased the expression of IL-1β. Additionally, TAK-242
effectively abolished IS-induced microglia activation and subsequent release of BDNF. These
data further support the role of TLR4 in the hyperalgesia of migraine-related pain and also
indicate that TLR4 may be a possible target of migraine therapy.In summary, IS-treated rats provided a valid model for migraine with facial mechanical
hypersensitivity. The TLR4-NF-κB signalling pathway has a substantial role in the
development of hyperalgesia following dural inflammation. Besides neuronal modulation, TLR4
also affects IS-induced microglia activation in the TCC. In addition, inhibition of TLR4
with TAK-242 pretreatment effectively alleviated IS-induced hyperalgesia and glia
activation. Nonetheless, further investigation is necessary because of several limitations,
such as the limited sample size and the lack of an assessment of the chronic process by
repeated IS delivery.
Authors: Andrew J Kwilasz; Suzanne M Green Fulgham; Julissa Chante Duran-Malle; Anouk E W Schrama; Eric H Mitten; Laurel S Todd; Hardik P Patel; Tracey A Larson; Madison A Clements; Kevin M Harris; Scott T Litwiler; Lewis O Harvey; Steven F Maier; Raymond A Chavez; Kenner C Rice; Anne-Marie Van Dam; Linda R Watkins Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Roshni Ramachandran; Zhenping Wang; Christian Saavedra; Anna DiNardo; Maripat Corr; Susan B Powell; Tony L Yaksh Journal: Mol Pain Date: 2019 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.395