Literature DB >> 29309683

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on Hearing Preservation Outcomes in Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas.

Matthew L Carlson1,2, Esther X Vivas3, D Jay McCracken4, Alex D Sweeney5, Brian A Neff1,2, Neil T Shepard1, Jeffrey J Olson4.   

Abstract

Question 1: What is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following stereotactic radiosurgery utilizing modern dose planning, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment? Recommendation: Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled that there is moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr. Question 2: Among patients with AAO-HNS (American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery hearing classification) class A or GR (Gardner-Robertson hearing classification) grade I hearing at baseline, what is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following stereotactic radiosurgery, utilizing modern dose planning, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment? Recommendation: Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled that there is a high probability (>75%-100%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr. Question 3: What patient- and tumor-related factors influence progression to nonserviceable hearing following stereotactic radiosurgery using ≤13 Gy to the tumor margin? Recommendation: Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled regarding the probability of successful hearing preservation based on the following prognostic data: the most consistent prognostic features associated with maintenance of serviceable hearing are good preoperative word recognition and/or pure tone thresholds with variable cut-points reported, smaller tumor size, marginal tumor dose ≤12 Gy, and cochlear dose ≤4 Gy. Age and sex are not strong predictors of hearing preservation outcome. Question 4: What is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following microsurgical resection of small to medium-sized sporadic vestibular schwannomas early after surgery, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment? Recommendation: Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering microsurgical resection should be counseled that there is a moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation immediately following surgery, moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr. Question 5: Among patients with AAO-HNS class A or GR grade I hearing at baseline, what is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing following microsurgical resection of small to medium-sized sporadic vestibular schwannomas early after surgery, at 2, 5, and 10 yr following treatment? Recommendation: Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering microsurgical resection should be counseled that there is a moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation immediately following surgery, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr. Question 6: What patient- and tumor-related factors influence progression to nonserviceable hearing following microsurgical resection of small to medium-sized sporadic vestibular schwannomas? Recommendation: Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering microsurgical resection should be counseled regarding the probability of successful hearing preservation based on the following prognostic data: the most consistent prognostic features associated with maintenance of serviceable hearing are good preoperative word recognition and/or pure tone thresholds with variable cut-points reported, smaller tumor size commonly less than 1 cm, and presence of a distal internal auditory canal cerebrospinal fluid fundal cap. Age and sex are not strong predictors of hearing preservation outcome. Question 7: What is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing with conservative observation of vestibular schwannomas at 2, 5, and 10 yr following diagnosis? Recommendation: Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering observation should be counseled that there is a high probability (>75%-100%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr, and moderately low probability (>25%-50%) of hearing preservation at 10 yr. Question 8: Among patients with AAO-HNS class A or GR grade I hearing at baseline, what is the overall probability of maintaining serviceable hearing with conservative observation at 2 and 5 yr following diagnosis? Recommendation: Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering stereotactic radiosurgery should be counseled that there is a high probability (>75%-100%) of hearing preservation at 2 yr, and moderately high probability (>50%-75%) of hearing preservation at 5 yr. Insufficient data were available to determine the probability of hearing preservation at 10 yr for this population subset. Question 9: What patient and tumor-related factors influence progression to nonserviceable hearing during conservative observation? Recommendation: Level 3: Individuals who meet these criteria and are considering observation should be counseled regarding probability of successful hearing preservation based on the following prognostic data: the most consistent prognostic features associated with maintenance of serviceable hearing are good preoperative word recognition and/or pure tone thresholds with variable cut-points reported, as well as nongrowth of the tumor. Tumor size at the time of diagnosis, age, and sex do not predict future development of nonserviceable hearing during observation.  The full guideline can be found at: https://www.cns.org/guidelines/guidelines-manage-ment-patients-vestibular-schwannoma/chapter_3.
Copyright © 2017 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic neuroma; Hearing loss; Hearing preservation; Radiosurgery; Skull base; Surgery; Vestibular schwannoma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29309683     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  13 in total

1.  Hearing Preservation in Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma.

Authors:  Anthony M Tolisano; Jacob B Hunter
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-01-10

2. 

Authors:  Daniel Newsted; Emily Rosen; Bonnie Cooke; Michael M Beyea; Matthew T W Simpson; Jason A Beyea
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Large and small vestibular schwannomas: same, yet different tumors.

Authors:  Satoshi Kiyofuji; Brian A Neff; Matthew L Carlson; Colin L W Driscoll; Michael J Link
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Can an Imaging Marker of Consistency Predict Intraoperative Experience and Clinical Outcomes for Vestibular Schwannomas? A Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Robert J Macielak; Michael S Harris; Jameson K Mattingly; Varun S Shah; Luciano M Prevedello; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-09-24

5.  The Effect of Prescription Isodose Variation on Tumor Control and Toxicities in Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: Propensity Score-Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Achiraya Teyateeti; Christopher S Graffeo; Avital Perry; Eric J Tryggestad; Paul D Brown; Bruce E Pollock; Michael J Link
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-02-18

Review 6.  Approach to hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel Newsted; Emily Rosen; Bonnie Cooke; Michael M Beyea; Matthew T W Simpson; Jason A Beyea
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  EANO guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Roland Goldbrunner; Michael Weller; Jean Regis; Morten Lund-Johansen; Pantelis Stavrinou; David Reuss; D Gareth Evans; Florence Lefranc; Kita Sallabanda; Andrea Falini; Patrick Axon; Olivier Sterkers; Laura Fariselli; Wolfgang Wick; Joerg-Christian Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Defining current practice patterns of vestibular schwannoma management in Italy: results of a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Diego Cazzador; Elisabetta Zanoletti; Nicola Quaranta; Marco Pontrelli; Sabino Ciprelli; Francesco Signorelli; Luca Denaro; Domenico d'Avella; Giovanni Danesi
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.124

9.  Treatment Outcomes and Dose Rate Effects Following Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas.

Authors:  Deborah Ruth Smith; Heva Jasmine Saadatmand; Cheng-Chia Wu; Paul J Black; Yen-Ruh Wuu; Jeraldine Lesser; Maryellen Horan; Steven R Isaacson; Tony J C Wang; Michael B Sisti
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Progressive Vestibular Schwannoma following Subtotal or Near-Total Resection: Dose-Escalated versus Standard-Dose Salvage Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Authors:  Mohamed H Khattab; Alexander D Sherry; Nauman Manzoor; Douglas J Totten; Guozhen Luo; Lola B Chambless; Alejandro Rivas; David S Haynes; Anthony J Cmelak; Albert Attia
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.