Microspores are reprogrammed towards embryogenesis by stress. Many microspores die after this stress, limiting the efficiency of microspore embryogenesis. Autophagy is a degradation pathway that plays critical roles in stress response and cell death. In animals, cathepsins have an integral role in autophagy by degrading autophagic material; less is known in plants. Plant cathepsins are papain-like C1A cysteine proteases involved in many physiological processes, including programmed cell death. We have analysed the involvement of autophagy in cell death, in relation to cathepsin activation, during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis in Hordeum vulgare. After stress, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cell death increased and autophagy was activated, including HvATG5 and HvATG6 up-regulation and increase of ATG5, ATG8, and autophagosomes. Concomitantly, cathepsin L/F-, B-, and H-like activities were induced, cathepsin-like genes HvPap-1 and HvPap-6 were up-regulated, and HvPap-1, HvPap-6, and HvPap-19 proteins increased and localized in the cytoplasm, resembling autophagy structures. Inhibitors of autophagy and cysteine proteases reduced cell death and promoted embryogenesis. The findings reveal a role for autophagy in stress-induced cell death during microspore embryogenesis, and the participation of cathepsins. Similar patterns of activation, expression, and localization suggest a possible connection between cathepsins and autophagy. The results open up new possibilities to enhance microspore embryogenesis efficiency with autophagy and/or cysteine protease modulators.
Microspores are reprogrammed towards embryogenesis by stress. Many microspores die after this stress, limiting the efficiency of microspore embryogenesis. Autophagy is a degradation pathway that plays critical roles in stress response and cell death. In animals, cathepsins have an integral role in autophagy by degrading autophagic material; less is known in plants. Plant cathepsins are papain-like C1A cysteine proteases involved in many physiological processes, including programmed cell death. We have analysed the involvement of autophagy in cell death, in relation to cathepsin activation, during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis in Hordeum vulgare. After stress, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cell death increased and autophagy was activated, including HvATG5 and HvATG6 up-regulation and increase of ATG5, ATG8, and autophagosomes. Concomitantly, cathepsin L/F-, B-, and H-like activities were induced, cathepsin-like genes HvPap-1 and HvPap-6 were up-regulated, and HvPap-1, HvPap-6, and HvPap-19 proteins increased and localized in the cytoplasm, resembling autophagy structures. Inhibitors of autophagy and cysteine proteases reduced cell death and promoted embryogenesis. The findings reveal a role for autophagy in stress-induced cell death during microspore embryogenesis, and the participation of cathepsins. Similar patterns of activation, expression, and localization suggest a possible connection between cathepsins and autophagy. The results open up new possibilities to enhance microspore embryogenesis efficiency with autophagy and/or cysteine protease modulators.
Plant cell plasticity and ability to regenerate embryos in in vitro culture have been extensively exploited for decades, in the areas of plant propagation, breeding, and conservation of genetic resources (Germaná and Lambardi, 2016). In vitro embryogenesis is a fascinating system to study cellular reprogramming and acquisition of totipotency, as well as an alternative to study early embryogenesis events since zygotes and immature embryos produced in planta are surrounded by maternal tissues and are difficult to analyse. Microspore embryogenesis is an in vitro system in which the haploid microspore is reprogrammed by the application of external stress treatment and enters into an embryogenesis pathway (Bárány ; Prem ). The resulting haploid and double-haploid embryos and generated plants are important biotechnological tools in plant breeding for the rapid generation of isogenic new varieties as they represent a source of new genetic variability, fixed in complete homozygous plants and obtained in only one generation step (Maluszynski et al., 2003). Despite the usefulness of stress-induced in vitro embryogenesis in breeding programmes, the efficiency of the system in many species of economic interest is still limited since it is greatly affected by many factors (El-Tantawy ; Rodríguez-Sanz , 2015; Solís , 2016; Testillano ), and primarily by the occurrence of cell death induced by the stress applied to trigger embryogenesis. In barley, microspore embryogenesis is efficiently induced by cold stress treatment in isolated microspore cultures (Rodríguez-Serrano ).Autophagy is a universal degradation pathway in all eukaryotes, including plants, that recycles cell materials upon stress conditions or during specific developmental processes, thereby promoting cell survival (reviewed in Hofius ; Masclaux-Daubresse ). In addition to this survival role, autophagy can also play critical roles as a cell death initiator and/or executioner. Increasing evidence indicates the involvement of autophagy in plant cell death (Minina , 2014; Yang and Bassham, 2015). In Picea abies embryos, it has been demonstrated that autophagy is responsible for cell self-disassembly during programmed cell death (PCD) (Minina ). In plants, autophagy-directed degradation of cellular components occurs mainly in vacuoles. It is initiated by the engulfment of subcellular components into a double membrane structure, the autophagosome, the outer membrane of which further fuses with the vacuole membrane, the tonoplast. This results in the release of the so-called autophagic bodies (single-membrane structures containing the cargo) at the vacuole interior where degradation takes place via the activity of lytic enzymes. In different plant species, autophagosomes either can fuse directly with the central vacuole or can first fuse with a smaller vacuole or lysosome-like organelle, which begins content degradation (Bassham, 2007). Activation of autophagy involves the induction of AuTophaGy-related ATG genes and activation of specific proteases. In the case of barley, 25 ATG genes have been characterized (Avila-Ospina ; Masclaux-Daubresse ). Among them, ATG5, ATG6, and ATG8 proteins play crucial roles in autophagosome formation (Li and Vierstra, 2012; Michaeli ).Plant cells actively produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) at low levels but, as a response to stress, cell production of ROS increases. ROS act as signalling molecules to control processes such as PCD and stress response. Excessive ROS levels may cause irreversible oxidative damage and activate signalling pathways ultimately leading to cell death (Apel and Hirt, 2004). Recent studies in plants and algae have described the activation of autophagy in response to several stress conditions that increase ROS production (Liu and Bassham, 2012; Pérez-Pérez , 2012). These findings suggest a strong link between autophagy and ROS production in plants.Autophagy and cell death proteases are well characterized in animals, and caspases are thought to be the major proteases involved. Although to date no functional homologues of animal caspases have been identified in plants, several indirect pieces of evidence suggest the existence of functionally related proteases with similar substrate specificity. The involvement of caspase-3-like enzymatic activity in plant PCD has been well documented, and its specific inhibitors block completion of PCD (Bonneau ; Solís ), although the identity of the protease(s) responsible has not yet been fully resolved. Recently, it has been reported that caspase-3 inhibitors reduce PCD in Arabidopsis by targeting cathepsin B, another major plant protease involved in PCD (Ge ).Cathepsins are papain-like C1A cysteine proteases, as classified in the MEROPS peptidase database (Rawlings ). They are well known lysosomal proteases with a role in autophagy and cell death, in animals (Turk and Stoka, 2007). It is well documented in animals that cathepsins are responsible for driving proteolytic degradation in lysosomes and have a critical role in the terminal degradation of proteins within autolysosomes, following the autophagosome fusion (Jung ; Kroemer and Jäättelä, 2005; Man and Kanneganti, 2016). In plants, this enzyme group with proteolytic activity is involved in many physiological processes such as senescence, abscission, fruit ripening, and PCD, and in the mobilization of proteins accumulated in seeds and tubers Martínez ; Díaz-Mendoza et al., 2014, 2016). Moreover, C1A proteases actively participate in proteolysis induced by biotic and abiotic stresses (Díaz-Mendoza ; Velasco-Arroyo ), but less is known about the possible role of plant cathepsins in autophagosome degradation. Plant cathepsins are grouped as cathepsin L-, B-, H-, and F-like according to their gene features and phylogenetic relationship. The activity of these proteases is regulated by specific inhibitors, termed phytocystatins (Martínez et al., 2009; Díaz-Mendoza ), and is also the target of synthetic exogenous inhibitors such as E-64. In barley, both C1A proteases and cystatins have been studied in depth (Martínez ; Díaz-Mendoza , 2016). However, there is no information on the action of these proteases during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis.During stress-induced microspore embryogenesis, we have reported increasing cell death levels and caspase-3-like activity, after the inductive stress to trigger microspore reprogramming, in barley (Rodríguez-Serrano ). Nevertheless, prior to the present work, no studies had been developed on the participation of autophagy during the induction of microspore embryogenesis mediated by stress in barley.In this work, we have studied the involvement of autophagy in cell death occurrence during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis of barley, in relation to cathepsin activation. The results indicated that autophagy is induced in microspores after the inductive stress. Concomitantly, cathepsins are also activated and show similar patterns of expression and localization to ATGs. Inhibition of autophagy and cathepsins reduced cell death levels and increased the embryogenesis induction rate. Taken together, the results indicate a role for autophagy in cell death at early stages of stress-induced microspore embryogenesis, a death process in which cathepsins also participate.
Materials and methods
Plant material and in vitro microspore embryogenesis culture
Winter barley cultivars (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Igri) were used as donor plants. Seeds were vernalized in soil for 1 month at 4 °C, grown at 12 °C with a 12 h light/12 h dark photoperiod (10 000–16 000 lux) for 1 month in a growth chamber (Sanyo MLR-351-H, relative humidity 70%), and then grown in a greenhouse under a controlled temperature of 18 °C. In vitro cultures of isolated microspores, the most responsive stage for embryogenesis induction, were performed by stress treatment of 4 °C, as previously described (Rodríguez-Serrano ).
Cell death detection
Microspore culture samples were incubated with a 0.25% (w/v) aqueous solution of Evans Blue for 30 min and observed with a light microscope under bright field. Mean percentages of dead cells (stained by Evans Blue) were quantified in random micrographs from two replicates of three independent experiments, as described (Solís ).
ROS detection
Microspore culture samples were incubated for 1 h, in the dark, with 10 µM dihydroethidium (DHE) to detect ROS, specifically superoxide radicals (Rodríguez-Serrano ). As negative control, samples were incubated for 1 h before DHE with 4 mM MnCl2, an O2– scavenger. After washing, samples were immediately observed with a confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP5) and signal captured as red fluorescence (490 nm excitation; 520 nm emission).
Treatments with inhibitors
At the time of culture initiation, several inhibitors (Table 1) were added to the microspore culture plates. Ac-DEVD-CHO, E-64, and concanamycin A (ConA) were added from concentrated stock solutions dissolved in ethanol (E-64) and DMSO (Ac-DEVD-CHO and ConA). Controls of solvent effects were performed by adding the same volumes of ethanol or DMSO to untreated cultures. 3-Methyladenine (3-MA) and MnCl2 were directly dissolved in the culture medium. Short treatments were carried out from culture initiation during 4 d. Mean percentages of ‘proembryos’ were quantified from random samples of three independent experiments, as previously described (Berenguer ).
Table 1.
Inhibitors and conditions used for in vitro treatments of microspore cultures
Inhibitors and conditions used for in vitro treatments of microspore culturesMnCl2, manganese chloride; Ac-DEVD-CHO, N-acetyl-l-α-aspartyl-l-α-glutamyl-N-(2-carboxyl-1-formylethyl)-l-valinamide; 3-MA, 3-methyladenine; E-64, trans-epoxysuccinyl-l-leucylamido(4-guanidino)butane; ConA, concanamycin A.
Antibodies
Cathepsin antibodies against HvPap-1, HvPap-6, and Hv-Pap-19 proteases were produced in rabbits by Pineda Antibody Services (Berlin, Germany), against specific peptide sequences of each protease (Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online); they were previously produced and reported to recognize these proteases in barley leaves (Díaz-Mendoza ). ATG5 antibody was kindly provided by Dr M.F. Suárez (University of Málaga, Spain), produced in rabbits with purified recombinant ATG5 protein of spruce as antigen (Supplementary Method S1). ATG8 antibody was produced in the laboratory of Dr J.L. Crespo (IBFV, Seville, Spain), and was reported to recognize specifically Arabidopsis ATG8 (Álvarez ; Pérez-Pérez ).
Fixation and processing for light and electron microscopy analyses
For light microscopy, in vitro samples were collected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 6.8, overnight at 4 °C. Samples were dehydrated in acetone and embedded in Technovit 8100 resin (Kulzer, Germany) at 4 °C. Semi-thin resin sections were either stained with toluidine blue and observed under bright field, for structural analysis, or stored at 4 °C and used for immunofluorescence (Solís ). For electron microscopy, samples were fixed in Karnowsky fixative (4% paraformaldehyde, 5% glutaraldehyde in 0.025 M cacodylate buffer with 0.5 mg ml–1 calcium chloride) for 4 h at room temperature, post-fixed in 2% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in an ethanol series and propylene oxide, and embedded in Epon 812 resin. Ultrathin sections were counterstained by uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined in an electron microscope (JEOL JEM 2100).
Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy
Semi-thin sections were blocked by 5% (w/v) BSA and incubated for 1 h with the corresponding primary polyclonal antibody diluted in 1% BSA at 1:100 (HvPap-1), 1:50 (HvPap-6), 1:20 (HvPap-19), and 1:50 (ATG5 and ATG8). After washing in PBS, signal was revealed with Alexa Fluor 488-labelled anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Molecular Probes) diluted 1:25 in 1% BSA for 45 min in darkness. Finally, sections were counterstained with 1 mg ml−1 DAPI for 10 min and analysed by confocal laser microscopy (Leica TCS-SP5-AOBS, Vienna, Austria). Images of maximum projections were obtained with software of the confocal microscope (Leica software LCS version 2.5). Negative controls were performed avoiding the primary antibody.
MDC in vivo staining
Microspore samples from untreated and inhibitor-treated cultures were stained with 0.05 mM monodansylcadaverine (MDC; Sigma-Aldrich), at room temperature for 30 min in darkness (Contento ). After incubation, cells were washed twice with PBS and immediately observed by confocal microscopy (Leica TCS SP5). Fluorescence of intracellular MDC was observed selecting wavelengths of 405 nm for excitation and 435–483 nm for emission.
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis (RT-qPCR)
Total RNA was extracted from in vitro samples using the RNeasy® Plant Micro and RNeasy® Plant Mini kits (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. cDNAs were obtained from 2 µg of RNA using the Superscript™ II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to Solís . RT-qPCR analyses were performed using the SsoAdvanced™ Universal SYBR®Green Supermix on the iQ™5 Real-Time PCR Detection Sytem (Biorad). The oligonucleotides used are described in Supplementary Table S2, and qPCR conditions were as previously described (Berenguer ). All qPCRs were run in duplicate, and the Cyclophilin gene was used as the internal reference gene. Transcript levels were normalized to the vacuolated microspore levels. Data were analysed with the Bio-Rad CFX Manager 3.0 (3.01224.1015) (Biorad), using the Livak calculation method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001).
Protein quantification and protease activities
Total soluble proteins were extracted from in vitro samples according to Velasco-Arroyo , using the method of Bradford (1976) for protein quantification. Enzymatic activity assays were performed as previously described (Velasco-Arroyo ) with minor modifications. Cathepsin L-/F-, B-, and H-like activities were assayed using Z-FR-AMC (N-carbobenzoxy-Phe-Arg-AMC), Z-RR-AMC (N-carbobenzoxy-Arg-Arg-AMC), and Bz-FVR-AMC (Bz-Phe-Val-Arg-AMC) substrates, respectively. The reaction was incubated at 28 °C for 1 h. All assays were carried out in duplicate. Blanks were used to account for spontaneous breakdown of substrates, and the results were expressed as nmol of hydrolysed substrate per mg of protein per min (nmol min–1 mg–1). The system was calibrated with known amounts of AMC (7-amino-4-methylcoumarin) in a standard reaction mixture.
Immunoblot analysis
Protein extracts were prepared from in vitro cultures by grinding microspore embryos in liquid nitrogen before the addition of 100 μl of extraction buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.0, and 2 mM EDTA). Extracted proteins were quantified by the Bradford method (Bradford, 1976) with BSA as standard. Proteins were separated on SDS–polyacrylamide gels (12%,w/v), electro-transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, and blocked in 3% BSA containing 0.5% Tween-20 for 1 h. Immunoblotting was performed according to Velasco-Arroyo with the polyclonal antibodies to cathepsins, at 1:2500, 1:2500, and 1:5000 dilutions for HvPap-1, HvPap-6, and HvPap-12 respectively. Peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma), diluted at 1:20 000 (v/v), was used as a secondary antibody for detection with ECL Plus.
Data analysis
Statistical differences among several stages were tested by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. Significant differences between untreated and treated cultures were tested by Student’s t-test, in all cases with P≤0.05.
Results
Cell death occurrence, ROS production, and caspase-3-like proteolytic activity in stress-induced microspore embryogenesis
Microspore embryogenesis was induced by cold stress (4 °C) in barley using isolated microspore in vitro cultures, as previously reported (Rodríguez-Serrano ). Vacuolated microspores (Fig. 1A), the most responsive stage for embryogenesis induction, were subjected to the inductive stress treatment. Four days after induction and culture initiation, multicellular structures still surrounded by the exine, the so-called microspore-derived ‘proembryos’, were produced (Fig. 1B). In 4 d cultures, proembryos were accompanied by non-responsive and dead microspores (Fig. 1B). During the following days of culture, microspore embryogenesis progressed, the exine broke down, and embryos developed (Fig. 1C) and followed a pathway similar to zygotic embryogenesis in monocot species, producing transitional and scutellar embryos and then, after 30 d in culture, coleoptilar embryos (Fig. 1D).
Fig. 1.
Stress-induced microspore embryogenesis in Hordeum vulgare. Micrographs of toluidine blue-stained semi-thin sections for general structural analysis. (A) Vacuolated microspore at culture initiation. (B) Proembryos on microspore culture 4 d after stress, still surrounded by the exine. (C) Early transitional embryo. (D) Microspore-derived embryos after 30 d in culture observed under the stereomicroscope. Ex, exine. Scale bars represent in (A–C) 20 µm, in (D) 10 mm.
Stress-induced microspore embryogenesis in Hordeum vulgare. Micrographs of toluidine blue-stained semi-thin sections for general structural analysis. (A) Vacuolated microspore at culture initiation. (B) Proembryos on microspore culture 4 d after stress, still surrounded by the exine. (C) Early transitional embryo. (D) Microspore-derived embryos after 30 d in culture observed under the stereomicroscope. Ex, exine. Scale bars represent in (A–C) 20 µm, in (D) 10 mm.The percentage of dead cells, identified by positive Evans blue staining (Fig. 2), was quantified at several culture steps: ‘isolated microspores’ (microspores extracted from spikes but not treated by stress), ‘stress-treated microspores’ (isolated microspores after the inductive stress), and ‘4 d cultures’ (stage of formation of the proembryo). Results showed the occurrence of cell death in isolated microspores, probably due to the isolation procedure and the presence of dead cells in the spike. Dead cell levels significantly increased (P<0.05, ANOVA and Tukey’s tests) after the stress treatment in stress-treated microspores and in 4 d cultures (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Cell death in stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. Histogram showing the percentage of cell death after cell isolation and inductive stress identified by Evan’s blue staining. Micrographs showing dead microspores as blue cells after Evan’s blue staining. Bars in columns indicate the SE. Scale bars in micrographs represent 60 µm. Different letters on columns indicate significant differences among stages, according to ANOVA and Tukey’s tests at P<0.05.
Cell death in stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. Histogram showing the percentage of cell death after cell isolation and inductive stress identified by Evan’s blue staining. Micrographs showing dead microspores as blue cells after Evan’s blue staining. Bars in columns indicate the SE. Scale bars in micrographs represent 60 µm. Different letters on columns indicate significant differences among stages, according to ANOVA and Tukey’s tests at P<0.05.ROS production was analysed by specific staining with the fluorescence probe DHE which specifically reacts with the intracellular superoxide anion (O2−) in vivo (Zhao ). Under confocal microscopy analysis, almost no signal was detected in isolated microspores (Fig. 3A) or 4 d cultures (Fig. 3C), whereas an intense fluorescence was observed in many stress-treated microspores (Fig. 3B). If stress-treated microspores were incubated with the ROS scavenger MnCl2, DHE staining did not provide any signal (Fig. 3D), confirming the specificity of the probe for ROS. The exine showed unspecific autofluorescence of different intensities in all cases (Fig. 3A'–D').
Fig. 3.
ROS staining during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. Specific staining with dihydroethidium (DHE). Confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis of (A, A') isolated microspore, (B, B') stress-treated microspore, (C, C') 4 d culture proembryo, (D, D') stress-treated microspore after incubation with MnCl2 (O2– scavenger). Scale bars represent 25 µm.
ROS staining during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. Specific staining with dihydroethidium (DHE). Confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis of (A, A') isolated microspore, (B, B') stress-treated microspore, (C, C') 4 d culture proembryo, (D, D') stress-treated microspore after incubation with MnCl2 (O2– scavenger). Scale bars represent 25 µm.To evaluate the effect on cell death of the elimination of ROS in stress-treated microspore cultures, treatments were performed with the ROS scavenger MnCl2, which specifically scavenges superoxide anions. Quantification of dead cells, by Evans blue staining, was carried out in MnCl2-treated and untreated cultures 4 d after the inductive stress. Results showed a significant reduction (P<0.05, Student’s t-test) in cell death levels in microspore cultures treated with the ROS scavenger in comparison with untreated cultures (Fig. 4A), indicating the involvement of ROS in cell death. As a consequence, the proportion of proembryos formed in microspore cultures treated with the ROS scavenger was significantly higher (P<0.05, Student’s t-test) than in control cultures (Fig. 4B).
Fig. 4.
Effect of treatments with MnCl2 (O2– scavenger) and Ac-DEVD-CHO (caspase-3 inhibitor) in stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. (A, C) Quantification of cell death levels, identified by Evan’s blue staining, 4 d after stress in untreated microspore cultures and cultures treated with MnCl2 (A) and Ac-DEVD-CHO (C). (B, D) Quantification of proembryos (as an indicator of microspore embryogenesis initiation) in microspore cultures, 4 d after stress, treated with MnCl2 (B) and Ac-DEVD-CHO (D). In all histograms, results are expressed as percentages (percent change) and referred to the mean percentage of dead cells or proembryos in control cultures which has been normalized to 100%. Bars indicate the SE. Asterisks indicate significant differences between treated and untreated cultures, within each treatment, assessed by Student’s t-test, at P<0.05.
Effect of treatments with MnCl2 (O2– scavenger) and Ac-DEVD-CHO (caspase-3 inhibitor) in stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. (A, C) Quantification of cell death levels, identified by Evan’s blue staining, 4 d after stress in untreated microspore cultures and cultures treated with MnCl2 (A) and Ac-DEVD-CHO (C). (B, D) Quantification of proembryos (as an indicator of microspore embryogenesis initiation) in microspore cultures, 4 d after stress, treated with MnCl2 (B) and Ac-DEVD-CHO (D). In all histograms, results are expressed as percentages (percent change) and referred to the mean percentage of dead cells or proembryos in control cultures which has been normalized to 100%. Bars indicate the SE. Asterisks indicate significant differences between treated and untreated cultures, within each treatment, assessed by Student’s t-test, at P<0.05.We have previously reported the induction of caspase-3-like proteolytic activity in barley microspore cultures after the inductive stress (Rodríguez-Serrano ). In the present study, to analyse the role of this enzymatic activity, treatments with Ac-DEVD-CHO, a specific inhibitor of caspase-3 activity, were performed in stress-treated microspores. The effects of the treatment with Ac-DEVD-CHO on cell death and embryogenesis induction were evaluated in control and treated cultures. The proportion of dead cells after the inductive stress was significantly lower (P<0.05, Student’s t-test) in microspore cultures treated with the inhibitor than in control cultures (Fig. 4C). After 4 d in culture, the number of proembryos was determined as an indicator of initiation of microspore embryogenesis. The results showed a statistically significant increase (P<0.05 Student’s t-test) in the proportion of proembryos produced in microspore cultures treated with the caspase-3 inhibitor in comparison with control cultures (Fig. 4D), probably as a consequence of the reduction in cell death.
ATG gene expression and protein localization in stress-induced microspore embryogenesis
Among the 25 ATG genes characterized in barley (Avila-Ospina ; Masclaux-Daubresse ), to evaluate the possible activation of autophagy in microspore embryogenesis cultures after the inductive stress, expression analyses were conducted for two key autophagy genes, HvATG5 and HvATG6, identified in barley with only one gene isoform each (Avila-Ospina ). RT-qPCRs showed similar expression patterns for both ATG genes: a low level of expression in isolated microspores, before the stress, and high gene expression in stress-treated microspores (Fig. 5). Later, in 4 d microspore cultures, expression decreased, dropping to levels similar to those seen with isolated microspores (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.
Gene expression patterns of autophagy genes HvATG5 and HvATG6 during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. Histogram showing relative changes of mRNA levels normalized to isolated microspore levels, as determined by RT-qPCR. Bars indicate the SE. Different letters indicate significant differences among stages within the expression of each gene according to ANOVA and Tukey’s tests at P<0.05.
Gene expression patterns of autophagy genes HvATG5 and HvATG6 during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. Histogram showing relative changes of mRNA levels normalized to isolated microspore levels, as determined by RT-qPCR. Bars indicate the SE. Different letters indicate significant differences among stages within the expression of each gene according to ANOVA and Tukey’s tests at P<0.05.ATG5 and ATG8 proteins, which have a crucial role in autophagy (Bassham, 2009; Li and Vierstra, 2012; Michaeli ), were localized by using specific antibodies. Immunofluorescence assays and confocal analyses on semi-thin sections showed no labelling in isolated microspores with either ATG5 or ATG8 antibodies (Fig. 6A, A', A''), whereas in stress-treated microspores ATG5 and ATG8 localized in small punctuate cytoplasmic structures (Fig. 6B, B', B''). Four days after the stress, no significant immunofluorescence labelling was observed with either of these two autophagy antibodies (Fig. 6C, C', C'').
Fig. 6.
Immunolocalization of autophagy proteins HvATG5 and HvATG8 during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. Immunofluorescence and confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis of isolated microspore (A–A'''), stress-treated microspore (B–B'''), and 4 d culture proembryo (C–C'''). (A–C, A''–C'') Normarsky’s differential interference contrast (DIC). (A'–C', A'''–C''') Merged images of ATG immunofluorescence (green) and DAPI staining of nuclei (blue). (A'–C') HvATG5. (A'''–C''') HvATG8. Scale bars represent in (A–B'') 10 µm, in (C–C'') 20 µm.
Immunolocalization of autophagy proteins HvATG5 and HvATG8 during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. Immunofluorescence and confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis of isolated microspore (A–A'''), stress-treated microspore (B–B'''), and 4 d culture proembryo (C–C'''). (A–C, A''–C'') Normarsky’s differential interference contrast (DIC). (A'–C', A'''–C''') Merged images of ATG immunofluorescence (green) and DAPI staining of nuclei (blue). (A'–C') HvATG5. (A'''–C''') HvATG8. Scale bars represent in (A–B'') 10 µm, in (C–C'') 20 µm.
Effects of treatments with the inhibitors of autophagy 3-MA, E-64, and Con A on cell death occurrence and microspore embryogenesis initiation
Functional analyses of autophagy in microspore embryogenesis were performed by treating microspore cultures in vitro with 3-MA, E-64, and ConA, three drugs commonly used to inhibit autophagy in plants (Matsuoka ; Takatsuka ; Sláviková ; Bassham, 2009, 2015; Merkulova ; Shin ; Yano ).Autophagosomes, autolysosome-like structures, and autophagic bodies can be detected by in vivo MDC staining in plant cell suspensions (Niemann ; Contento ). Microspores were stained by MDC and analysed by confocal microscopy. Stress-treated microspores showed strong MDC fluorescence on small spherical cytoplasmic spots (Fig. 7A, A'). These spots were of different sizes, and were occasionally observed within vacuoles, and, therefore, they most probably corresponded to autophagosomes and autophagic bodies. Electron microscopy provided evidence of autophagic structures in stress-treated microspores. Ultrastructural analysis revealed the presence of early and mature autophagosomes. Autophagosomes at an early stage of their formation appeared as double-membrane structures with semi-dense content, similar to the cytoplasm (Fig. 7B, inset). Advanced/mature autophagosomes that had engulfed cytoplasmic structures/organelles showed double- and multiple-membrane structures, with organelle and membrane remnants in their interior (Fig. 7B).
Fig. 7.
Detection of autophagosomes and autophagic bodies in stress-treated microspores by monodansylcadaverine (MDC) staining and ultrastructural analysis. (A, A') MDC staining of an autophagosome/autophagic body (green) under confocal microscopy, (A) merged DIC and fluorescence image. (B) Electron microscopy images of autophagosomes. The main micrograph shows an advanced/mature autophagosome that has engulfed cytoplasmic organelles/material. The inset shows an autophagosome at an early stage of its formation. Bars represent in (A, A') 25 µm, in (B) 0.5 µm, in (inset) 0.2 µm.
Detection of autophagosomes and autophagic bodies in stress-treated microspores by monodansylcadaverine (MDC) staining and ultrastructural analysis. (A, A') MDC staining of an autophagosome/autophagic body (green) under confocal microscopy, (A) merged DIC and fluorescence image. (B) Electron microscopy images of autophagosomes. The main micrograph shows an advanced/mature autophagosome that has engulfed cytoplasmic organelles/material. The inset shows an autophagosome at an early stage of its formation. Bars represent in (A, A') 25 µm, in (B) 0.5 µm, in (inset) 0.2 µm.3-MA is an inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PtdIns3K) involved in the formation of the autophagosome (Li and Vierstra, 2012). 3-MA has been reported to block autophagosome formation in tobacco BY2 culture cells, at 5 mM concentration (Takatsuka ). To evaluate its effects on microspore cultures, 5 mM 3-MA was added to the culture media of stress-treated microspores. Inhibition of autophagy by 3-MA was measured in microspores after the inductive stress by quantifying the autophagosomes and autophagic bodies, as revealed by MDC, in untreated and 3-MA-treated cultures (Fig. 8A, C). Control assays without MDC staining in stress-treated microspores did not provide fluorescence to any subcellular structure, except for the microspore wall, the exine, which exhibited unspecific autofluorescence in all microspores (Fig. 8B). 3-MA-treated and untreated cultures showed cells with MDC-stained spots (one or two) and cells without any stained structures (Fig. 8A, C). The results of the quantification showed a significant reduction of autophagy in microspores treated with 3-MA in comparison with control cultures (Student’s t-test, P<0.05), as revealed by the reduction in the proportion of cells with autophagosomes (Fig. 9A) and the decrease in the mean number of autophagosomes per cell (Fig. 9B).
Fig. 8.
Effects of treatments with 3-MA, E-64, and ConA on autophagosome presence in microspore cultures. (A, C–E) MDC staining and confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis of stress-treated microspores. (B) Control without MDC in stress-treated microspores, which show unspecific autofluorescence of the microspore wall, the exine. (A) Untreated microspore culture. (C) Microspore culture treated with 3-MA. (D) Microspore culture treated with E-64. (E) Microspore culture treated with ConA. Scale bars in micrographs represent 20 µm.
Fig. 9.
Quantitative analyses of autophagy in microspore cultures after treatments with autophagy inhibitors 3-MA, E64, and ConA. (A, B) 3-MA treatment. (C, D) E-64 treatment. (E, F) ConA treatment. (A, C, E) Cells with autophagosomes (MDC-positive cells) in untreated and treated microspore cultures. (B, D, F) Autophagosomes per cell in untreated and treated microspore cultures. In all histograms, results are expressed as percentages (percent change) and referred to the mean percentage in untreated cultures which has been normalized to 100%. Bars in histograms indicate the SE. Asterisks indicate significant differences between treated and untreated cultures, within each treatment, assessed by Student’s t-test, at P<0.05.
Effects of treatments with 3-MA, E-64, and ConA on autophagosome presence in microspore cultures. (A, C–E) MDC staining and confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis of stress-treated microspores. (B) Control without MDC in stress-treated microspores, which show unspecific autofluorescence of the microspore wall, the exine. (A) Untreated microspore culture. (C) Microspore culture treated with 3-MA. (D) Microspore culture treated with E-64. (E) Microspore culture treated with ConA. Scale bars in micrographs represent 20 µm.Quantitative analyses of autophagy in microspore cultures after treatments with autophagy inhibitors 3-MA, E64, and ConA. (A, B) 3-MA treatment. (C, D) E-64 treatment. (E, F) ConA treatment. (A, C, E) Cells with autophagosomes (MDC-positive cells) in untreated and treated microspore cultures. (B, D, F) Autophagosomes per cell in untreated and treated microspore cultures. In all histograms, results are expressed as percentages (percent change) and referred to the mean percentage in untreated cultures which has been normalized to 100%. Bars in histograms indicate the SE. Asterisks indicate significant differences between treated and untreated cultures, within each treatment, assessed by Student’s t-test, at P<0.05.The cysteine protease inhibitor E-64 was also added to microspore cultures after the inductive stress to trigger embryogenesis. In many plant species, E-64 has been reported to block autophagy at the step of autophagosome degradation, which therefore leads to the accumulation of autophagic bodies in vacuoles or smaller autolysosome-like organelles in the cytoplasm (Bassham, 2007, 2015; Moriyasu and Inoue, 2008). Microspore cultures treated with E-64 showed cells with higher numbers of MDC-stained spots in their cytoplasms (up to 4–6 spots) compared with untreated cultures, whose cells showed 0–2 spots per cell (Fig. 8A, D). Moreover, quantitative analyses showed a significantly higher proportion of cells with autophagic bodies (Fig. 9C), as well as a significant increase in the mean number of autophagic structures per cell (Fig. 9D) in E-64-treated cultures compared with untreated cultures (Student’s t-test, P<0.05).ConA, which inhibits vacuolar proton pumps and leads to increased vacuolar pH and inactivation of acid hydrolases, has been used to inhibit autophagic body degradation and to assess autophagic flux in plant tissues and cell suspensions (Matsuoka ; Sláviková ; Shin ; Bassham, 2015; Yano ). ConA treatment of microspore cultures showed a similar effect to E-64 treatment. In ConA-treated cultures, MDC staining revealed cells with a higher number of autophagosomes (3–6) than untreated cultures (Fig. 8A, E). The quantitative analyses of MDC-positive spots showed that ConA-treated cultures presented a significant increase in both the proportion of cells with autophagosomes and the number of autophagosomes per cell (Fig. 9E, F). These results indicated that ConA treatment led to the blocking of autophagic body degradation in stress-treated microspores. The accumulation of autophagosomes/autophagic bodies after E-64 and ConA treatments also suggested the existence of autophagic flux in microspores after the stress.The effects of the treatments with 3-MA, E-64, and ConA on cell death and embryogenesis induction were also evaluated. After the inductive stress, cell death levels in microspore cultures were significantly reduced by these three inhibitors (Student’s t-test, P<0.05), in comparison with untreated cultures (Fig. 10A, C, E).
Fig. 10.
Effects of treatments with 3-MA, E-64, and ConA on cell death and embryogenesis induction in microspore cultures. Quantification of the percentage of dead cells (A, C, E) and proembryos (B, D, F) on microspore cultures 4 d after stress in untreated cultures and cultures treated with 3-MA (A, B), E-64 (C, D), and ConA (E, F). In all histograms, results are expressed as percentages (percent change) and referred to the mean percentage of dead cells or proembryos in untreated cultures which has been normalized to 100%. Bars indicate the SE. Asterisks indicate significant differences between treated and untreated cultures, within each treatment, assessed by Student’s t-test, at P<0.05.
Effects of treatments with 3-MA, E-64, and ConA on cell death and embryogenesis induction in microspore cultures. Quantification of the percentage of dead cells (A, C, E) and proembryos (B, D, F) on microspore cultures 4 d after stress in untreated cultures and cultures treated with 3-MA (A, B), E-64 (C, D), and ConA (E, F). In all histograms, results are expressed as percentages (percent change) and referred to the mean percentage of dead cells or proembryos in untreated cultures which has been normalized to 100%. Bars indicate the SE. Asterisks indicate significant differences between treated and untreated cultures, within each treatment, assessed by Student’s t-test, at P<0.05.Regarding the quantification of the proembryos in 4 d cultures, the proportion of proembryos in cultures treated with 3-MA, E-64, and ConA was significantly higher than in untreated cultures (Fig. 10B, D, F). These results indicated that inhibition of autophagy by blocking autophagosome formation, with 3-MA, or by inhibition of autophagic body degradation, with E-64 or ConA, improved embryogenesis initiation yield while reducing cell death levels caused by the inductive stress.
Cathepsin-like activity, gene expression, and subcellular localization in stress-induced microspore embryogenesis
We analysed the role of cathepsins in the stress response of microspores because of their relationship with autophagy in animals, and their relevant role as plant cell death proteases. As a first approach, the enzymatic activity was quantified for all the cathepsin activities identified in plants. Significant differences among stages were assessed by ANOVA and Tukey’s tests, with P<0.05 conferring statistical significance. Low levels of cathepsin L-/F-, B-, and H-like activities were detected in isolated microspores (Fig. 11A). After the stress, especially in 4 d cultures, cathepsin L-/F-, B-, and H-like proteolytic activities significantly increased, reaching >2-fold the proteolytic values detected before the stress (Fig. 11A).
Fig. 11.
Patterns of cathepsin proteolytic activities and gene expression during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. (A) Proteolytic pattern of cathepsin L-/F-like, cathepsin B-like, and cathepsin H-like cysteine proteases. Specific activity, in nmol mg–1 min–1. (B) Transcript levels of the HvPap-1 gene (cathepsin F-like protease), HvPap-6 gene (cathepsin L-like protease), and HvPap-12 gene (cathepsin H-like protease) normalized to the isolated microspore within each gene. Bars indicate the SE. Different letters indicate significant differences among stages within each activity/gene studied, according to ANOVA and Tukey’s tests at P<0.05.
Patterns of cathepsin proteolytic activities and gene expression during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. (A) Proteolytic pattern of cathepsin L-/F-like, cathepsin B-like, and cathepsin H-like cysteine proteases. Specific activity, in nmol mg–1 min–1. (B) Transcript levels of the HvPap-1 gene (cathepsin F-like protease), HvPap-6 gene (cathepsin L-like protease), and HvPap-12 gene (cathepsin H-like protease) normalized to the isolated microspore within each gene. Bars indicate the SE. Different letters indicate significant differences among stages within each activity/gene studied, according to ANOVA and Tukey’s tests at P<0.05.The expression of several cathepsin genes previously characterized in barley and related to the protease activities detected, HvPap-1, HvPap-6, and HvPap-12, which encode cathepsins of type F-, L-,and H-like, respectively, was also analysed in microspore cultures by RT-qPCR. The three cathepsin genes were expressed at low levels in isolated microspores, while after the stress treatment (in stress-treated microspores and 4 d cultures), HvPap-1 and HvPap-6 were induced (Fig. 11B). The cathepsin H-like HvPap-12 gene did not show significant changes, suggesting that other genes are likely to contribute to the increase of cathepsin H activity detected in microspores after stress. Among the cathepsin genes studied, the cathepsin L-like HvPap-6 showed the greatest increase in expression after stress, in both stress-treated microspores and 4 d cultures (Fig. 11B).To gain more insight into the activation of cathepsins during cell death in stress-induced microspore embryogenesis cultures, the presence and subcellular localization of the proteins HvPap-1, HvPap-6, and HvPap-19 (a cathepsin B-like protein in barley) were analysed using specific antibodies (previously produced in rabbits by Pineda Antibody Services; Díaz-Mendoza ). HvPap-12 protein could not be localized since no antibodies were available. The specificity of the antibodies in microspore-derived embryos was assessed by immunoblot assays. Results revealed that each antibody recognized only two bands corresponding to the inactive (zymogen) and active forms of the corresponding C1A protease (Fig. 12). The bands appeared at the expected molecular weights reported for HvPap-1 (40 016 kDa and 26 204 kDa), HvPap-6 (50 226 kDa and 35 158 kDa), and HvPap-19 (37 222 kDa and 29 234 kDa) (Cambra ).
Fig. 12.
Protein patterns of cathepsins HvPap-1, HvPap-6, and HvPap-19 in microspore-derived embryos detected by immunoblot. Arrows indicate bands corresponding to the inactive (upper) and active (lower) forms of each protease.
Protein patterns of cathepsins HvPap-1, HvPap-6, and HvPap-19 in microspore-derived embryos detected by immunoblot. Arrows indicate bands corresponding to the inactive (upper) and active (lower) forms of each protease.Immunofluorescence assays followed by confocal microscopy analyses provided evidence of the induction of cathepsins and their subcellular localization in microspores after the inductive stress to trigger embryogenesis. The results showed very low or no detectable signal with the three cathepsin antibodies on isolated microspores before the stress (Fig. 13A, A', A'', A'''), whereas stress-treated microspores (Fig. 13B, B', B'', B''') and cells of 4 d cultures (Fig. 13C, C', C'', C''') exhibited intense and specific labelling in small cytoplasmic spots of different sizes, probably corresponding to small vacuoles, a pattern that resembled autophagy structures. Patterns of labelling were similar for the three cathepsins, except for HvPap-19, which showed much less labelling in stress-treated microspores (Fig. 13B''') than the others. Controls without the primary antibody did not show any labelling.
Fig. 13.
Immunolocalization of barley cysteine proteases (HvPap-1, -6, and -19) during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. Immunofluorescence and confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis of (A–A''') isolated microspore, (B–B''') stress-treated microspore, and (C–C''') 4 d culture proembryo confined by the exine. (A-C) Normarsky’s differential interference contrast (DIC). (A'–C''') Merged images of cysteine protease immunofluorescence (green) and DAPI staining of nuclei (blue). (A'–C') HvPap-1 cysteine protease. (A''-C'') HvPap-6 cysteine protease. (A'''-C''') HvPap-19 cysteine protease. Scale bars represent in (A–B''') 10 µm, in (C–C''') 20 µm.
Immunolocalization of barley cysteine proteases (HvPap-1, -6, and -19) during stress-induced microspore embryogenesis. Immunofluorescence and confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis of (A–A''') isolated microspore, (B–B''') stress-treated microspore, and (C–C''') 4 d culture proembryo confined by the exine. (A-C) Normarsky’s differential interference contrast (DIC). (A'–C''') Merged images of cysteine protease immunofluorescence (green) and DAPI staining of nuclei (blue). (A'–C') HvPap-1 cysteine protease. (A''-C'') HvPap-6 cysteine protease. (A'''-C''') HvPap-19 cysteine protease. Scale bars represent in (A–B''') 10 µm, in (C–C''') 20 µm.
Discussion
Autophagy is activated and has a role in the cell death promoted by the inductive stress of microspore embryogenesis
The results of the present work provide evidence of the activation and involvement of autophagy in cell death in the response of microspores to the inductive stress triggering embryogenesis in barley. In microspore embryogenesis systems, after the application of the stress treatment, a proportion of the cells present in the in vitro culture are reprogrammed, initiating the embryogenesis pathway; these cells are known as responsive cells. Together with the responsive cells, many other cells die, strongly limiting the efficiency of the process (Rodríguez-Serrano ).The involvement of plant autophagy in PCD processes during development and pathogen infection is well known (Yang and Bassham, 2015); however, no information had been available until now regarding the role of autophagy in cell death during stress-induced embryogenesis.Autophagy has been shown to be a rather general response to a variety of abiotic stresses, playing a role in removing damaged proteins and organelles that can be generated as a result of ROS accumulation during oxidative burst. Increasing evidence has connected ROS and autophagy in plants and algae (Pérez-Pérez ). In Arabidopsis, it has been demonstrated that oxidative damage caused by ROS generators led to a rapid and strong induction of autophagy (Bassham, 2007). Furthermore, when plants are exposed to abiotic stress conditions, ROS production acts as a common signal to activate stress responses, including autophagy (Bassham, 2009). In a previous study, we reported ROS production in microspores after the inductive stress of embryogenesis, in barley (Rodríguez-Serrano ). In the present study, endogenous ROS production has also been detected in barley microspores after stress, while treatments with ROS scavengers lead to a reduction in cell death levels. These results indicate the involvement of these reactive molecules in microspore death in this system.Furthermore, our results demonstrate that the inductive stress to trigger microspore embryogenesis in barley also induced the activation of autophagy, which is supported by the up-regulation of autophagy HvATG5 and HvATG6 genes, the increase of autophagosome-like structures containing ATG5 and ATG8 proteins, and the ultrastructural observation of autophagic structures in microspores after the stress. Moreover, when the inhibitors E-64 or ConA were added to the culture medium, complete autophagosomal degradation is impaired and the proportion of microspores with autophagic structures and their number per cell increased, indicating the active formation of autophagosomes after the stress.On the other hand, plant proteases with caspase-3-like activity are well known to participate in many PCD processes (Bonneau ). In a previous report, we have shown this proteolytic activity to be induced in microspores after the inductive stress to trigger embryogenesis (Rodríguez-Serrano ). A recent report has demonstrated that the Arabidopsis cathepsin B protease has caspase-3-like activity and is inhibited by caspase-3-specific inhibitors; AtCathepsin B triple mutants showed a strong reduction in PCD induced by several abiotic stresses, including oxidative stress, indicating a central role for this protease in stress-induced PCD in Arabidopsis (Ge ). The results of the present study show the effects of a specific caspase-3 inhibitor, namely the reduction of cell death levels in microspore cultures, providing additional evidence for the involvement of caspase-like activities in the stress-induced cell death in microspores. In barley caryopsis, a VEIDase protease was found to have a caspase-like activity; it was localized to autophagosomes, linking the caspase activity to autophagic PCD (Borén ). The results presented here show that autophagy and cell death are also connected to caspase-3-like proteolytic activity in microspores treated with the inductive stress of embryogenesis.The role of autophagy in degradation of cellular components during PCD execution has been reported in various plant PCD processes during development, such as suspensor degradation in spruce somatic embryogenesis (Minina , 2014, ), ovary degradation in wheat, petal senescence, and xylogenesis (reviewed in Bassham, 2009). Autophagy has also been implicated in PCD induced by pathogens and other injuries (Hofius , 2017). New results are reported here on the activation of autophagy associated with cell death occurrence, in response to the inductive stress triggering microspore embryogenesis. Nevertheless, the exact role of autophagy in cell death is still not completely understood. The functional analyses performed in the present study with several autophagy inhibitors have revealed the implication of autophagy in cell death occurrence. The results presented here reveal that 3-MA inhibited autophagy in stress-treated microspores of barley, as in other plant systems, most probably impairing autophagosome formation (Takatsuka ). Moreover, 3-MA treatment resulted in the reduction of cell death levels of microspores after stress. Secondary effects of 3-MA have been reported in some systems, such as in Arabidopsis root hairs, where 3-MA could inhibit mitochondrial-activated PCD rather than autophagy (Kacprzyk ). Although possible secondary effects of 3-MA in microspores cannot be completely ruled out, there is no evidence in microspores of mitochondrial activation of PCD, and our results indicate that in microspores 3-MA inhibits autophagy and leads to a reduction of cell death. Treatments with other autophagy inhibitors, such as E-64 and ConA, which block autophagosome degradation, have been used in plant tissues and suspension cells (Matsuoka ; Sláviková ; Moriyasu and Inoue, 2008; Shin ; Bassham, 2015; Yano ). Their application in microspore cultures also leads to impaired autophagy activity in microspores after the stress, and to a decrease in cell death levels. Therefore, these results indicate the involvement of autophagy, at least in part, in the death of the microspores in response to the stress.Autophagy is activated in response to many physiological cues and stress conditions, and has been associated with both cell survival and cell death. Depending on the context and intensity, autophagy can protect cells or mediate cell death (Kroemer and Jäättelä, 2005). In the case of microspore embryogenesis, the response of microspores to the stress treatment depends on many factors, such as the physiological state and the developmental stage of the cell. Only a certain proportion of the heterogeneous cell population of the microspore cultures tolerates the stress and is responsive to embryogenesis induction, whereas many other cells cannot tolerate the stress and die. Our results show that the application of the inductive stress leads to the activation of autophagy that plays a role in the death of cells, since autophagy inhibition reduces cell death levels. As a consequence of this reduction in cell death, embryogenesis induction was enhanced. On the other hand, the possibility that autophagy activity could also have a prosurvival function in some other stress-treated cells cannot be completely ruled out.
Together with autophagy, cathepsins are induced and participate in the cell death of microspores after the inductive stress of embryogenesis
Because cathepsins are well known lysosomal proteases with a role in autophagy and cell death, in animals (Turk and Stoka, 2007), and as they are major proteases with reported functions in cell death also in plants, we have analysed the participation of cathepsins in the microspore response to the inductive stress. In animals, numerous reports have documented the critical role of cathepsins in the degradation of cytoplasmic organelles and components through autophagy, being responsible for the terminal degradation of proteins within autolysosomes (Kroemer and Jäättelä, 2005; Jung ; Man and Kanneganti, 2016). Nevertheless, much less information is available on plant cathepsins.The results of our study revealed the participation of C1A proteases (cathepsins) in stress-induced microspore embryogenesis, with the up-regulation of cathepsin genes HvPap-1 and HvPap-6, which encode cathepsins F- and L-like, respectively, after the stress. Concomitantly, the cathepsin L-/F-, B-, and H-like proteolytic activities increase in stress-treated microspores, as does the presence in their cytoplasm of proteins HvPap-1, HvPap-6, and HvPap-19 (a cathepsin B-like protein in barley; Díaz-Mendoza ). These proteases localized in small cytoplasmic spots of various sizes, probably corresponding to vesicles, lysosomal-like organelles, and small vacuoles of stress-treated microspores, a localization pattern that resembles that of autophagy structures. These results indicate the role of cysteineC1A proteases in the microspore response to stress.In barley, C1A proteases, specifically HvPap-1, have been reported to participate in the proteolysis induced in leaves by abiotic stresses such as darkness and nitrogen starvation (Velasco-Arroyo ), as well as in the development and germination of barley grains (Díaz-Mendoza ). Nevertheless, the role of HvPap-1 in PCD has not been previously described. Likewise, little is known about the function of HvPap-6 and HvPap-19 in this process. In Arabidopsis, Zhang reported that CEP1, a C1Acysteine protease, plays a key role in tapetal PCD, a process that critically regulates pollen development. Our results demonstrate that these proteases contribute to the response to stress of microspores. Moreover, when we treated microspores with E-64, which inhibits intracellular cysteine proteases, the levels of cell death decreased, suggesting the involvement of these proteases in cell death in stress-treated microspore cultures. As a consequence of this reduction in cell death, embryogenesis induction was enhanced, which opens up new possibilities for biotechnological manipulation of the process with cysteine protease modulators to improve the yield of in vitro embryogenesis systems.Several reports in animals have demonstrated that treatment with inhibitors of the lysosomal cysteine proteases, such as cathepsins B- and L-like proteases, impairs autophagy, and mutants with reduced cathepsins B and D show impaired autophagic degradation (Tatti ). A previous study connected autophagy and cathepsins to the promotion of cell death associated with the hypersensitive response to pathogens in Arabidopsis (Hofius ), and it was suggested that they could contribute to different cell death pathways operating in plant immunity responses. The pattern of localization of HvPap cathepsins in microspores as cytoplasmic spots of different sizes is consistent with them being located in vesicles, lysosomal-like structures and small vacuoles, some of which could represent autolysosome-like structures and small autophagic vacuoles. This fact, together with the activation of both autophagy and cathepsins after the stress, the similar induction of cathepsin and ATG gene expression after the stress, and the observation of the same effects in reducing cell death by the inhibition of both actions, suggests a connection between C1A proteases (cathepsins) and autophagy in stress-treated microspores, as has been widely demonstrated in mammalian cells (Man and Kanneganti, 2016), although further work will be required to prove this connection. The induction of autophagy after the stress, together with the activation of cathepsins, may be crucial in the orchestration of cell death among other cell responses to the inductive stress, therefore participating in the control of success of embryogenesis initiation.
Conclusions
In summary, the results reported here reveal that autophagy is activated after the inductive stress used to trigger microspore embryogenesis in barley, and its pharmacological inhibition reduces cell death levels, indicating a role for autophagy in the stress-induced cell death of microspores. Cathepsin protease activities are concomitantly induced, and their inhibition also impaired cell death. The similar patterns of activation, expression, and localization of autophagy and cathepsins suggest a connection between both activities in stress-induced cell death during microspore embryogenesis induction, a hypothesis that needs further analyses. The findings provide new insights into the mechanisms underlying the microspore response to the inductive stress, opening up new possibilities to enhance microspore embryogenesis efficiency in recalcitrant species while reducing cell death levels with modulators of autophagy and cysteine proteases.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data are available at JXB online.Table S1. Cathepsin-like protease amino acid sequences (peptides) used for specific antibody production.Table S2. Primer sequences used for the amplification of genes by RT-qPCR assays.Method S1. Methods for the production of ATG5 antibodies with the recombinant ATG5 protein of Picea abies.Click here for additional data file.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Yolanda Pérez-Pérez; Ivett Bárány; Eduardo Berenguer; Elena Carneros; María C Risueño; Pilar S Testillano Journal: Plant Signal Behav Date: 2018-12-22
Authors: Daniel J Klionsky; Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz; Sara Abdelfatah; Mahmoud Abdellatif; Asghar Abdoli; Steffen Abel; Hagai Abeliovich; Marie H Abildgaard; Yakubu Princely Abudu; Abraham Acevedo-Arozena; Iannis E Adamopoulos; Khosrow Adeli; Timon E Adolph; Annagrazia Adornetto; Elma Aflaki; Galila Agam; Anupam Agarwal; Bharat B Aggarwal; Maria Agnello; Patrizia Agostinis; Javed N Agrewala; Alexander Agrotis; Patricia V Aguilar; S Tariq Ahmad; Zubair M Ahmed; Ulises Ahumada-Castro; Sonja Aits; Shu Aizawa; Yunus Akkoc; Tonia Akoumianaki; Hafize Aysin Akpinar; Ahmed M Al-Abd; Lina Al-Akra; Abeer Al-Gharaibeh; Moulay A Alaoui-Jamali; Simon Alberti; Elísabet Alcocer-Gómez; Cristiano Alessandri; Muhammad Ali; M Abdul Alim Al-Bari; Saeb Aliwaini; Javad Alizadeh; Eugènia Almacellas; Alexandru Almasan; Alicia Alonso; Guillermo D Alonso; Nihal Altan-Bonnet; Dario C Altieri; Élida M C Álvarez; Sara Alves; Cristine Alves da Costa; Mazen M Alzaharna; Marialaura Amadio; Consuelo Amantini; Cristina Amaral; Susanna Ambrosio; Amal O Amer; Veena Ammanathan; Zhenyi An; Stig U Andersen; Shaida A Andrabi; Magaiver Andrade-Silva; Allen M Andres; Sabrina Angelini; David Ann; Uche C Anozie; Mohammad Y Ansari; Pedro Antas; Adam Antebi; Zuriñe Antón; Tahira Anwar; Lionel Apetoh; Nadezda Apostolova; Toshiyuki Araki; Yasuhiro Araki; Kohei Arasaki; Wagner L Araújo; Jun Araya; Catherine Arden; Maria-Angeles Arévalo; Sandro Arguelles; Esperanza Arias; Jyothi Arikkath; Hirokazu Arimoto; Aileen R Ariosa; Darius Armstrong-James; Laetitia Arnauné-Pelloquin; Angeles Aroca; Daniela S Arroyo; Ivica Arsov; Rubén Artero; Dalia Maria Lucia Asaro; Michael Aschner; Milad Ashrafizadeh; Osnat Ashur-Fabian; Atanas G Atanasov; Alicia K Au; Patrick Auberger; Holger W Auner; Laure Aurelian; Riccardo Autelli; Laura Avagliano; Yenniffer Ávalos; Sanja Aveic; Célia Alexandra Aveleira; Tamar Avin-Wittenberg; Yucel Aydin; Scott Ayton; Srinivas Ayyadevara; Maria Azzopardi; Misuzu Baba; Jonathan M Backer; Steven K Backues; Dong-Hun Bae; Ok-Nam Bae; Soo Han Bae; Eric H Baehrecke; Ahruem Baek; Seung-Hoon Baek; Sung Hee Baek; Giacinto Bagetta; Agnieszka Bagniewska-Zadworna; Hua Bai; Jie Bai; Xiyuan Bai; Yidong Bai; Nandadulal Bairagi; Shounak Baksi; Teresa Balbi; Cosima T Baldari; Walter Balduini; Andrea Ballabio; Maria Ballester; Salma Balazadeh; Rena Balzan; Rina Bandopadhyay; Sreeparna Banerjee; Sulagna Banerjee; Ágnes Bánréti; Yan Bao; Mauricio S Baptista; Alessandra Baracca; Cristiana Barbati; Ariadna Bargiela; Daniela Barilà; Peter G Barlow; Sami J Barmada; Esther Barreiro; George E Barreto; Jiri Bartek; Bonnie Bartel; Alberto Bartolome; Gaurav R Barve; Suresh H Basagoudanavar; Diane C Bassham; Robert C Bast; Alakananda Basu; Henri Batoko; Isabella Batten; Etienne E Baulieu; Bradley L Baumgarner; Jagadeesh Bayry; Rupert Beale; Isabelle Beau; Florian Beaumatin; Luiz R G Bechara; George R Beck; Michael F Beers; Jakob Begun; Christian Behrends; Georg M N Behrens; Roberto Bei; Eloy Bejarano; Shai Bel; Christian Behl; Amine Belaid; Naïma Belgareh-Touzé; Cristina Bellarosa; Francesca Belleudi; Melissa Belló Pérez; Raquel Bello-Morales; Jackeline Soares de Oliveira Beltran; Sebastián Beltran; Doris Mangiaracina Benbrook; Mykolas Bendorius; Bruno A Benitez; Irene Benito-Cuesta; Julien Bensalem; Martin W Berchtold; Sabina Berezowska; Daniele Bergamaschi; Matteo Bergami; Andreas Bergmann; Laura Berliocchi; Clarisse Berlioz-Torrent; Amélie Bernard; Lionel Berthoux; Cagri G Besirli; Sebastien Besteiro; Virginie M Betin; Rudi Beyaert; Jelena S Bezbradica; Kiran Bhaskar; Ingrid Bhatia-Kissova; Resham Bhattacharya; Sujoy Bhattacharya; Shalmoli Bhattacharyya; Md Shenuarin Bhuiyan; Sujit Kumar Bhutia; Lanrong Bi; Xiaolin Bi; Trevor J Biden; Krikor Bijian; Viktor A Billes; Nadine Binart; Claudia Bincoletto; Asa B Birgisdottir; Geir Bjorkoy; Gonzalo Blanco; Ana Blas-Garcia; Janusz Blasiak; Robert Blomgran; Klas Blomgren; Janice S Blum; Emilio Boada-Romero; Mirta Boban; Kathleen Boesze-Battaglia; Philippe Boeuf; Barry Boland; Pascale Bomont; Paolo Bonaldo; Srinivasa Reddy Bonam; Laura Bonfili; Juan S Bonifacino; Brian A Boone; Martin D Bootman; Matteo Bordi; Christoph Borner; Beat C Bornhauser; Gautam Borthakur; Jürgen Bosch; Santanu Bose; Luis M Botana; Juan Botas; Chantal M Boulanger; Michael E Boulton; Mathieu Bourdenx; Benjamin Bourgeois; Nollaig M Bourke; Guilhem Bousquet; Patricia Boya; Peter V Bozhkov; Luiz H M Bozi; Tolga O Bozkurt; Doug E Brackney; Christian H Brandts; Ralf J Braun; Gerhard H Braus; Roberto Bravo-Sagua; José M Bravo-San Pedro; Patrick Brest; Marie-Agnès Bringer; Alfredo Briones-Herrera; V Courtney Broaddus; Peter Brodersen; Jeffrey L Brodsky; Steven L Brody; Paola G Bronson; Jeff M Bronstein; Carolyn N Brown; Rhoderick E Brown; Patricia C Brum; John H Brumell; Nicola Brunetti-Pierri; Daniele Bruno; Robert J Bryson-Richardson; Cecilia Bucci; Carmen Buchrieser; Marta Bueno; Laura Elisa Buitrago-Molina; Simone Buraschi; Shilpa Buch; J Ross Buchan; Erin M Buckingham; Hikmet Budak; Mauricio Budini; Geert Bultynck; Florin Burada; Joseph R Burgoyne; M Isabel Burón; Victor Bustos; Sabrina Büttner; Elena Butturini; Aaron Byrd; Isabel Cabas; Sandra Cabrera-Benitez; Ken Cadwell; Jingjing Cai; Lu Cai; Qian Cai; Montserrat Cairó; Jose A Calbet; Guy A Caldwell; Kim A Caldwell; Jarrod A Call; Riccardo Calvani; Ana C Calvo; Miguel Calvo-Rubio Barrera; Niels Os Camara; Jacques H Camonis; Nadine Camougrand; Michelangelo Campanella; Edward M Campbell; François-Xavier Campbell-Valois; Silvia Campello; Ilaria Campesi; Juliane C Campos; Olivier Camuzard; Jorge Cancino; Danilo Candido de Almeida; Laura Canesi; Isabella Caniggia; Barbara Canonico; Carles Cantí; Bin Cao; Michele Caraglia; Beatriz Caramés; Evie H Carchman; Elena Cardenal-Muñoz; Cesar Cardenas; Luis Cardenas; Sandra M Cardoso; Jennifer S Carew; Georges F Carle; Gillian Carleton; Silvia Carloni; Didac Carmona-Gutierrez; Leticia A Carneiro; Oliana Carnevali; Julian M Carosi; Serena Carra; Alice Carrier; Lucie Carrier; Bernadette Carroll; A Brent Carter; Andreia Neves Carvalho; Magali Casanova; Caty Casas; Josefina Casas; Chiara Cassioli; Eliseo F Castillo; Karen Castillo; Sonia Castillo-Lluva; Francesca Castoldi; Marco Castori; Ariel F Castro; Margarida Castro-Caldas; Javier Castro-Hernandez; Susana Castro-Obregon; Sergio D Catz; Claudia Cavadas; Federica Cavaliere; Gabriella Cavallini; Maria Cavinato; Maria L Cayuela; Paula Cebollada Rica; Valentina Cecarini; Francesco Cecconi; Marzanna Cechowska-Pasko; Simone Cenci; Victòria Ceperuelo-Mallafré; João J Cerqueira; Janete M Cerutti; Davide Cervia; Vildan Bozok Cetintas; Silvia Cetrullo; Han-Jung Chae; Andrei S Chagin; Chee-Yin Chai; Gopal Chakrabarti; Oishee Chakrabarti; Tapas Chakraborty; Trinad Chakraborty; Mounia Chami; Georgios Chamilos; David W Chan; Edmond Y W Chan; Edward D Chan; H Y Edwin Chan; Helen H Chan; Hung Chan; Matthew T V Chan; Yau Sang Chan; Partha K Chandra; Chih-Peng Chang; Chunmei Chang; Hao-Chun Chang; Kai Chang; Jie Chao; Tracey Chapman; Nicolas Charlet-Berguerand; Samrat Chatterjee; Shail K Chaube; Anu Chaudhary; Santosh Chauhan; Edward Chaum; Frédéric Checler; Michael E Cheetham; Chang-Shi Chen; Guang-Chao Chen; Jian-Fu Chen; Liam L Chen; Leilei Chen; Lin Chen; Mingliang Chen; Mu-Kuan Chen; Ning Chen; Quan Chen; Ruey-Hwa Chen; Shi Chen; Wei Chen; Weiqiang Chen; Xin-Ming Chen; Xiong-Wen Chen; Xu Chen; Yan Chen; Ye-Guang Chen; Yingyu Chen; Yongqiang Chen; Yu-Jen Chen; Yue-Qin Chen; Zhefan Stephen Chen; Zhi Chen; Zhi-Hua Chen; Zhijian J Chen; Zhixiang Chen; Hanhua Cheng; Jun Cheng; Shi-Yuan Cheng; Wei Cheng; Xiaodong Cheng; Xiu-Tang Cheng; Yiyun Cheng; Zhiyong Cheng; Zhong Chen; Heesun Cheong; Jit Kong Cheong; Boris V Chernyak; Sara Cherry; Chi Fai Randy Cheung; Chun Hei Antonio Cheung; King-Ho Cheung; Eric Chevet; Richard J Chi; Alan Kwok Shing Chiang; Ferdinando Chiaradonna; Roberto Chiarelli; Mario Chiariello; Nathalia Chica; Susanna Chiocca; Mario Chiong; Shih-Hwa Chiou; Abhilash I Chiramel; Valerio Chiurchiù; Dong-Hyung Cho; Seong-Kyu Choe; Augustine M K Choi; Mary E Choi; Kamalika Roy Choudhury; Norman S Chow; Charleen T Chu; Jason P Chua; John Jia En Chua; Hyewon Chung; Kin Pan Chung; Seockhoon Chung; So-Hyang Chung; Yuen-Li Chung; Valentina Cianfanelli; Iwona A Ciechomska; Mariana Cifuentes; Laura Cinque; Sebahattin Cirak; Mara Cirone; Michael J Clague; Robert Clarke; Emilio Clementi; Eliana M Coccia; Patrice Codogno; Ehud Cohen; Mickael M Cohen; Tania Colasanti; Fiorella Colasuonno; Robert A Colbert; Anna Colell; Miodrag Čolić; Nuria S Coll; Mark O Collins; María I Colombo; Daniel A Colón-Ramos; Lydie Combaret; Sergio Comincini; Márcia R Cominetti; Antonella Consiglio; Andrea Conte; Fabrizio Conti; Viorica Raluca Contu; Mark R Cookson; Kevin M Coombs; Isabelle Coppens; Maria Tiziana Corasaniti; Dale P Corkery; Nils Cordes; Katia Cortese; Maria do Carmo Costa; Sarah Costantino; Paola Costelli; Ana Coto-Montes; Peter J Crack; Jose L Crespo; Alfredo Criollo; Valeria Crippa; Riccardo Cristofani; Tamas Csizmadia; Antonio Cuadrado; Bing Cui; Jun Cui; Yixian Cui; Yong Cui; Emmanuel Culetto; Andrea C Cumino; Andrey V Cybulsky; Mark J Czaja; Stanislaw J Czuczwar; Stefania D'Adamo; Marcello D'Amelio; Daniela D'Arcangelo; Andrew C D'Lugos; Gabriella D'Orazi; James A da Silva; Hormos Salimi Dafsari; Ruben K Dagda; Yasin Dagdas; Maria Daglia; Xiaoxia Dai; Yun Dai; Yuyuan Dai; Jessica Dal Col; Paul Dalhaimer; Luisa Dalla Valle; Tobias Dallenga; Guillaume Dalmasso; Markus Damme; Ilaria Dando; Nico P Dantuma; April L Darling; Hiranmoy Das; Srinivasan Dasarathy; Santosh K Dasari; Srikanta Dash; Oliver Daumke; Adrian N Dauphinee; Jeffrey S Davies; Valeria A Dávila; Roger J Davis; Tanja Davis; Sharadha Dayalan Naidu; Francesca De Amicis; Karolien De Bosscher; Francesca De Felice; Lucia De Franceschi; Chiara De Leonibus; Mayara G de Mattos Barbosa; Guido R Y De Meyer; Angelo De Milito; Cosimo De Nunzio; Clara De Palma; Mauro De Santi; Claudio De Virgilio; Daniela De Zio; Jayanta Debnath; Brian J DeBosch; Jean-Paul Decuypere; Mark A Deehan; Gianluca Deflorian; James DeGregori; Benjamin Dehay; Gabriel Del Rio; Joe R Delaney; Lea M D Delbridge; Elizabeth Delorme-Axford; M Victoria Delpino; Francesca Demarchi; Vilma Dembitz; Nicholas D Demers; Hongbin Deng; Zhiqiang Deng; Joern Dengjel; Paul Dent; Donna Denton; Melvin L DePamphilis; Channing J Der; Vojo Deretic; Albert Descoteaux; Laura Devis; Sushil Devkota; Olivier Devuyst; Grant Dewson; Mahendiran Dharmasivam; Rohan Dhiman; Diego di Bernardo; Manlio Di Cristina; Fabio Di Domenico; Pietro Di Fazio; Alessio Di Fonzo; Giovanni Di Guardo; Gianni M Di Guglielmo; Luca Di Leo; Chiara Di Malta; Alessia Di Nardo; Martina Di Rienzo; Federica Di Sano; George Diallinas; Jiajie Diao; Guillermo Diaz-Araya; Inés Díaz-Laviada; Jared M Dickinson; Marc Diederich; Mélanie Dieudé; Ivan Dikic; Shiping Ding; Wen-Xing Ding; Luciana Dini; Jelena Dinić; Miroslav Dinic; Albena T Dinkova-Kostova; Marc S Dionne; Jörg H W Distler; Abhinav Diwan; Ian M C Dixon; Mojgan Djavaheri-Mergny; Ina Dobrinski; Oxana Dobrovinskaya; Radek Dobrowolski; Renwick C J Dobson; Jelena Đokić; Serap Dokmeci Emre; Massimo Donadelli; Bo Dong; Xiaonan Dong; Zhiwu Dong; Gerald W Dorn Ii; Volker Dotsch; Huan Dou; Juan Dou; Moataz Dowaidar; Sami Dridi; Liat Drucker; Ailian Du; Caigan Du; Guangwei Du; Hai-Ning Du; Li-Lin Du; André du Toit; Shao-Bin Duan; Xiaoqiong Duan; Sónia P Duarte; Anna Dubrovska; Elaine A Dunlop; Nicolas Dupont; Raúl V Durán; Bilikere S Dwarakanath; Sergey A Dyshlovoy; Darius Ebrahimi-Fakhari; Leopold Eckhart; Charles L Edelstein; Thomas Efferth; Eftekhar Eftekharpour; Ludwig Eichinger; Nabil Eid; Tobias Eisenberg; N Tony Eissa; Sanaa Eissa; Miriam Ejarque; Abdeljabar El Andaloussi; Nazira El-Hage; Shahenda El-Naggar; Anna Maria Eleuteri; Eman S El-Shafey; Mohamed Elgendy; Aristides G Eliopoulos; María M Elizalde; Philip M Elks; Hans-Peter Elsasser; Eslam S Elsherbiny; Brooke M Emerling; N C Tolga Emre; Christina H Eng; Nikolai Engedal; Anna-Mart Engelbrecht; Agnete S T Engelsen; Jorrit M Enserink; Ricardo Escalante; Audrey Esclatine; Mafalda Escobar-Henriques; Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen; Lucile Espert; Makandjou-Ola Eusebio; Gemma Fabrias; Cinzia Fabrizi; Antonio Facchiano; Francesco Facchiano; Bengt Fadeel; Claudio Fader; Alex C Faesen; W Douglas Fairlie; Alberto Falcó; Bjorn H Falkenburger; Daping Fan; Jie Fan; Yanbo Fan; Evandro F Fang; Yanshan Fang; Yognqi Fang; Manolis Fanto; Tamar Farfel-Becker; Mathias Faure; Gholamreza Fazeli; Anthony O Fedele; Arthur M Feldman; Du Feng; Jiachun Feng; Lifeng Feng; Yibin Feng; Yuchen Feng; Wei Feng; Thais Fenz Araujo; Thomas A Ferguson; Álvaro F Fernández; Jose C Fernandez-Checa; Sonia Fernández-Veledo; Alisdair R Fernie; Anthony W Ferrante; Alessandra Ferraresi; Merari F Ferrari; Julio C B Ferreira; Susan Ferro-Novick; Antonio Figueras; Riccardo Filadi; Nicoletta Filigheddu; Eduardo Filippi-Chiela; Giuseppe Filomeni; Gian Maria Fimia; Vittorio Fineschi; Francesca Finetti; Steven Finkbeiner; Edward A Fisher; Paul B Fisher; Flavio Flamigni; Steven J Fliesler; Trude H Flo; Ida Florance; Oliver Florey; Tullio Florio; Erika Fodor; Carlo Follo; Edward A Fon; Antonella Forlino; Francesco Fornai; Paola Fortini; Anna Fracassi; Alessandro Fraldi; Brunella Franco; Rodrigo Franco; Flavia Franconi; Lisa B Frankel; Scott L Friedman; Leopold F Fröhlich; Gema Frühbeck; Jose M Fuentes; Yukio Fujiki; Naonobu Fujita; Yuuki Fujiwara; Mitsunori Fukuda; Simone Fulda; Luc Furic; Norihiko Furuya; Carmela Fusco; Michaela U Gack; Lidia Gaffke; Sehamuddin Galadari; Alessia Galasso; Maria F Galindo; Sachith Gallolu Kankanamalage; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Vincent Galy; Noor Gammoh; Boyi Gan; Ian G Ganley; Feng Gao; Hui Gao; Minghui Gao; Ping Gao; Shou-Jiang Gao; Wentao Gao; Xiaobo Gao; Ana Garcera; Maria Noé Garcia; Verónica E Garcia; Francisco García-Del Portillo; Vega Garcia-Escudero; Aracely Garcia-Garcia; Marina Garcia-Macia; Diana García-Moreno; Carmen Garcia-Ruiz; Patricia García-Sanz; Abhishek D Garg; Ricardo Gargini; Tina Garofalo; Robert F Garry; Nils C Gassen; Damian Gatica; Liang Ge; Wanzhong Ge; Ruth Geiss-Friedlander; Cecilia Gelfi; Pascal Genschik; Ian E Gentle; Valeria Gerbino; Christoph Gerhardt; Kyla Germain; Marc Germain; David A Gewirtz; Elham Ghasemipour Afshar; Saeid Ghavami; Alessandra Ghigo; Manosij Ghosh; Georgios Giamas; Claudia Giampietri; Alexandra Giatromanolaki; Gary E Gibson; Spencer B Gibson; Vanessa Ginet; Edward Giniger; Carlotta Giorgi; Henrique Girao; Stephen E Girardin; Mridhula Giridharan; Sandy Giuliano; Cecilia Giulivi; Sylvie Giuriato; Julien Giustiniani; Alexander Gluschko; Veit Goder; Alexander Goginashvili; Jakub Golab; David C Goldstone; Anna Golebiewska; Luciana R Gomes; Rodrigo Gomez; Rubén Gómez-Sánchez; Maria Catalina Gomez-Puerto; Raquel Gomez-Sintes; Qingqiu Gong; Felix M Goni; Javier González-Gallego; Tomas Gonzalez-Hernandez; Rosa A Gonzalez-Polo; Jose A Gonzalez-Reyes; Patricia González-Rodríguez; Ing Swie Goping; Marina S Gorbatyuk; Nikolai V Gorbunov; Kıvanç Görgülü; Roxana M Gorojod; Sharon M Gorski; Sandro Goruppi; Cecilia Gotor; Roberta A Gottlieb; Illana Gozes; Devrim Gozuacik; Martin Graef; Markus H Gräler; Veronica Granatiero; Daniel Grasso; Joshua P Gray; Douglas R Green; Alexander Greenhough; Stephen L Gregory; Edward F Griffin; Mark W Grinstaff; Frederic Gros; Charles Grose; Angelina S Gross; Florian Gruber; Paolo Grumati; Tilman Grune; Xueyan Gu; Jun-Lin Guan; Carlos M Guardia; Kishore Guda; Flora Guerra; Consuelo Guerri; Prasun Guha; Carlos Guillén; Shashi Gujar; Anna Gukovskaya; Ilya Gukovsky; Jan Gunst; Andreas Günther; Anyonya R Guntur; Chuanyong Guo; Chun Guo; Hongqing Guo; Lian-Wang Guo; Ming Guo; Pawan Gupta; Shashi Kumar Gupta; Swapnil Gupta; Veer Bala Gupta; Vivek Gupta; Asa B Gustafsson; David D Gutterman; Ranjitha H B; Annakaisa Haapasalo; James E Haber; Aleksandra Hać; Shinji Hadano; Anders J Hafrén; Mansour Haidar; Belinda S Hall; Gunnel Halldén; Anne Hamacher-Brady; Andrea Hamann; Maho Hamasaki; Weidong Han; Malene Hansen; Phyllis I Hanson; Zijian Hao; Masaru Harada; Ljubica Harhaji-Trajkovic; Nirmala Hariharan; Nigil Haroon; James Harris; Takafumi Hasegawa; Noor Hasima Nagoor; Jeffrey A Haspel; Volker Haucke; Wayne D Hawkins; Bruce A Hay; Cole M Haynes; Soren B Hayrabedyan; Thomas S Hays; Congcong He; Qin He; Rong-Rong He; You-Wen He; Yu-Ying He; Yasser Heakal; Alexander M Heberle; J Fielding Hejtmancik; Gudmundur Vignir Helgason; Vanessa Henkel; Marc Herb; Alexander Hergovich; Anna Herman-Antosiewicz; Agustín Hernández; Carlos Hernandez; Sergio Hernandez-Diaz; Virginia Hernandez-Gea; Amaury Herpin; Judit Herreros; Javier H Hervás; Daniel Hesselson; Claudio Hetz; Volker T Heussler; Yujiro Higuchi; Sabine Hilfiker; Joseph A Hill; William S Hlavacek; Emmanuel A Ho; Idy H T Ho; Philip Wing-Lok Ho; Shu-Leong Ho; Wan Yun Ho; G Aaron Hobbs; Mark Hochstrasser; Peter H M Hoet; Daniel Hofius; Paul Hofman; Annika Höhn; Carina I Holmberg; Jose R Hombrebueno; Chang-Won Hong Yi-Ren Hong; Lora V Hooper; Thorsten Hoppe; Rastislav Horos; Yujin Hoshida; I-Lun Hsin; Hsin-Yun Hsu; Bing Hu; Dong Hu; Li-Fang Hu; Ming Chang Hu; Ronggui Hu; Wei Hu; Yu-Chen Hu; Zhuo-Wei Hu; Fang Hua; Jinlian Hua; Yingqi Hua; Chongmin Huan; Canhua Huang; Chuanshu Huang; Chuanxin Huang; Chunling Huang; Haishan Huang; Kun Huang; Michael L H Huang; Rui Huang; Shan Huang; Tianzhi Huang; Xing Huang; Yuxiang Jack Huang; Tobias B Huber; Virginie Hubert; Christian A Hubner; Stephanie M Hughes; William E Hughes; Magali Humbert; Gerhard Hummer; James H Hurley; Sabah Hussain; Salik Hussain; Patrick J Hussey; Martina Hutabarat; Hui-Yun Hwang; Seungmin Hwang; Antonio Ieni; Fumiyo Ikeda; Yusuke Imagawa; Yuzuru Imai; Carol Imbriano; Masaya Imoto; Denise M Inman; Ken Inoki; Juan Iovanna; Renato V Iozzo; Giuseppe Ippolito; Javier E Irazoqui; Pablo Iribarren; Mohd Ishaq; Makoto Ishikawa; Nestor Ishimwe; Ciro Isidoro; Nahed Ismail; Shohreh Issazadeh-Navikas; Eisuke Itakura; Daisuke Ito; Davor Ivankovic; Saška Ivanova; Anand Krishnan V Iyer; José M Izquierdo; Masanori Izumi; Marja Jäättelä; Majid Sakhi Jabir; William T Jackson; Nadia Jacobo-Herrera; Anne-Claire Jacomin; Elise Jacquin; Pooja Jadiya; Hartmut Jaeschke; Chinnaswamy Jagannath; Arjen J Jakobi; Johan Jakobsson; Bassam Janji; Pidder Jansen-Dürr; Patric J Jansson; Jonathan Jantsch; Sławomir Januszewski; Alagie Jassey; Steve Jean; Hélène Jeltsch-David; Pavla Jendelova; Andreas Jenny; Thomas E Jensen; Niels Jessen; Jenna L Jewell; Jing Ji; Lijun Jia; Rui Jia; Liwen Jiang; Qing Jiang; Richeng Jiang; Teng Jiang; Xuejun Jiang; Yu Jiang; Maria Jimenez-Sanchez; Eun-Jung Jin; Fengyan Jin; Hongchuan Jin; Li Jin; Luqi Jin; Meiyan Jin; Si Jin; Eun-Kyeong Jo; Carine Joffre; Terje Johansen; Gail V W Johnson; Simon A Johnston; Eija Jokitalo; Mohit Kumar Jolly; Leo A B Joosten; Joaquin Jordan; Bertrand Joseph; Dianwen Ju; Jeong-Sun Ju; Jingfang Ju; Esmeralda Juárez; Delphine Judith; Gábor Juhász; Youngsoo Jun; Chang Hwa Jung; Sung-Chul Jung; Yong Keun Jung; Heinz Jungbluth; Johannes Jungverdorben; Steffen Just; Kai Kaarniranta; Allen Kaasik; Tomohiro Kabuta; Daniel Kaganovich; Alon Kahana; Renate Kain; Shinjo Kajimura; Maria Kalamvoki; Manjula Kalia; Danuta S Kalinowski; Nina Kaludercic; Ioanna Kalvari; Joanna Kaminska; Vitaliy O Kaminskyy; Hiromitsu Kanamori; Keizo Kanasaki; Chanhee Kang; Rui Kang; Sang Sun Kang; Senthilvelrajan Kaniyappan; Tomotake Kanki; Thirumala-Devi Kanneganti; Anumantha G Kanthasamy; Arthi Kanthasamy; Marc Kantorow; Orsolya Kapuy; Michalis V Karamouzis; Md Razaul Karim; Parimal Karmakar; Rajesh G Katare; Masaru Kato; Stefan H E Kaufmann; Anu Kauppinen; Gur P Kaushal; Susmita Kaushik; Kiyoshi Kawasaki; Kemal Kazan; Po-Yuan Ke; Damien J Keating; Ursula Keber; John H Kehrl; Kate E Keller; Christian W Keller; Jongsook Kim Kemper; Candia M Kenific; Oliver Kepp; Stephanie Kermorgant; Andreas Kern; Robin Ketteler; Tom G Keulers; Boris Khalfin; Hany Khalil; Bilon Khambu; Shahid Y Khan; Vinoth Kumar Megraj Khandelwal; Rekha Khandia; Widuri Kho; Noopur V Khobrekar; Sataree Khuansuwan; Mukhran Khundadze; Samuel A Killackey; Dasol Kim; Deok Ryong Kim; Do-Hyung Kim; Dong-Eun Kim; Eun Young Kim; Eun-Kyoung Kim; Hak-Rim Kim; Hee-Sik Kim; Jeong Hun Kim; Jin Kyung Kim; Jin-Hoi Kim; Joungmok Kim; Ju Hwan Kim; Keun Il Kim; Peter K Kim; Seong-Jun Kim; Scot R Kimball; Adi Kimchi; Alec C Kimmelman; Tomonori Kimura; Matthew A King; Kerri J Kinghorn; Conan G Kinsey; Vladimir Kirkin; Lorrie A Kirshenbaum; Sergey L Kiselev; Shuji Kishi; Katsuhiko Kitamoto; Yasushi Kitaoka; Kaio Kitazato; Richard N Kitsis; Josef T Kittler; Ole Kjaerulff; Peter S Klein; Thomas Klopstock; Jochen Klucken; Helene Knævelsrud; Roland L Knorr; Ben C B Ko; Fred Ko; Jiunn-Liang Ko; Hotaka Kobayashi; Satoru Kobayashi; Ina Koch; Jan C Koch; Ulrich Koenig; Donat Kögel; Young Ho Koh; Masato Koike; Sepp D Kohlwein; Nur M Kocaturk; Masaaki Komatsu; Jeannette König; Toru Kono; Benjamin T Kopp; Tamas Korcsmaros; Gözde Korkmaz; Viktor I Korolchuk; Mónica Suárez Korsnes; Ali Koskela; Janaiah Kota; Yaichiro Kotake; Monica L Kotler; Yanjun Kou; Michael I Koukourakis; Evangelos Koustas; Attila L Kovacs; Tibor Kovács; Daisuke Koya; Tomohiro Kozako; Claudine Kraft; Dimitri Krainc; Helmut Krämer; Anna D Krasnodembskaya; Carole Kretz-Remy; Guido Kroemer; Nicholas T Ktistakis; Kazuyuki Kuchitsu; Sabine Kuenen; Lars Kuerschner; Thomas Kukar; Ajay Kumar; Ashok Kumar; Deepak Kumar; Dhiraj Kumar; Sharad Kumar; Shinji Kume; Caroline Kumsta; Chanakya N Kundu; Mondira Kundu; Ajaikumar B Kunnumakkara; Lukasz Kurgan; Tatiana G Kutateladze; Ozlem Kutlu; SeongAe Kwak; Ho Jeong Kwon; Taeg Kyu Kwon; Yong Tae Kwon; Irene Kyrmizi; Albert La Spada; Patrick Labonté; Sylvain Ladoire; Ilaria Laface; Frank Lafont; Diane C Lagace; Vikramjit Lahiri; Zhibing Lai; Angela S Laird; Aparna Lakkaraju; Trond Lamark; Sheng-Hui Lan; Ane Landajuela; Darius J R Lane; Jon D Lane; Charles H Lang; Carsten Lange; Ülo Langel; Rupert Langer; Pierre Lapaquette; Jocelyn Laporte; Nicholas F LaRusso; Isabel Lastres-Becker; Wilson Chun Yu Lau; Gordon W Laurie; Sergio Lavandero; Betty Yuen Kwan Law; Helen Ka-Wai Law; Rob Layfield; Weidong Le; Herve Le Stunff; Alexandre Y Leary; Jean-Jacques Lebrun; Lionel Y W Leck; Jean-Philippe Leduc-Gaudet; Changwook Lee; Chung-Pei Lee; Da-Hye Lee; Edward B Lee; Erinna F Lee; Gyun Min Lee; He-Jin Lee; Heung Kyu Lee; Jae Man Lee; Jason S Lee; Jin-A Lee; Joo-Yong Lee; Jun Hee Lee; Michael Lee; Min Goo Lee; Min Jae Lee; Myung-Shik Lee; Sang Yoon Lee; Seung-Jae Lee; Stella Y Lee; Sung Bae Lee; Won Hee Lee; Ying-Ray Lee; Yong-Ho Lee; Youngil Lee; Christophe Lefebvre; Renaud Legouis; Yu L Lei; Yuchen Lei; Sergey Leikin; Gerd Leitinger; Leticia Lemus; Shuilong Leng; Olivia Lenoir; Guido Lenz; Heinz Josef Lenz; Paola Lenzi; Yolanda León; Andréia M Leopoldino; Christoph Leschczyk; Stina Leskelä; Elisabeth Letellier; Chi-Ting Leung; Po Sing Leung; Jeremy S Leventhal; Beth Levine; Patrick A Lewis; Klaus Ley; Bin Li; Da-Qiang Li; Jianming Li; Jing Li; Jiong Li; Ke Li; Liwu Li; Mei Li; Min Li; Min Li; Ming Li; Mingchuan Li; Pin-Lan Li; Ming-Qing Li; Qing Li; Sheng Li; Tiangang Li; Wei Li; Wenming Li; Xue Li; Yi-Ping Li; Yuan Li; Zhiqiang Li; Zhiyong Li; Zhiyuan Li; Jiqin Lian; Chengyu Liang; Qiangrong Liang; Weicheng Liang; Yongheng Liang; YongTian Liang; Guanghong Liao; Lujian Liao; Mingzhi Liao; Yung-Feng Liao; Mariangela Librizzi; Pearl P Y Lie; Mary A Lilly; Hyunjung J Lim; Thania R R Lima; Federica Limana; Chao Lin; Chih-Wen Lin; Dar-Shong Lin; Fu-Cheng Lin; Jiandie D Lin; Kurt M Lin; Kwang-Huei Lin; Liang-Tzung Lin; Pei-Hui Lin; Qiong Lin; Shaofeng Lin; Su-Ju Lin; Wenyu Lin; Xueying Lin; Yao-Xin Lin; Yee-Shin Lin; Rafael Linden; Paula Lindner; Shuo-Chien Ling; Paul Lingor; Amelia K Linnemann; Yih-Cherng Liou; Marta M Lipinski; Saška Lipovšek; Vitor A Lira; Natalia Lisiak; Paloma B Liton; Chao Liu; Ching-Hsuan Liu; Chun-Feng Liu; Cui Hua Liu; Fang Liu; Hao Liu; Hsiao-Sheng Liu; Hua-Feng Liu; Huifang Liu; Jia Liu; Jing Liu; Julia Liu; Leyuan Liu; Longhua Liu; Meilian Liu; Qin Liu; Wei Liu; Wende Liu; Xiao-Hong Liu; Xiaodong Liu; Xingguo Liu; Xu Liu; Xuedong Liu; Yanfen Liu; Yang Liu; Yang Liu; Yueyang Liu; Yule Liu; J Andrew Livingston; Gerard Lizard; Jose M Lizcano; Senka Ljubojevic-Holzer; Matilde E LLeonart; David Llobet-Navàs; Alicia Llorente; Chih Hung Lo; Damián Lobato-Márquez; Qi Long; Yun Chau Long; Ben Loos; Julia A Loos; Manuela G López; Guillermo López-Doménech; José Antonio López-Guerrero; Ana T López-Jiménez; Óscar López-Pérez; Israel López-Valero; Magdalena J Lorenowicz; Mar Lorente; Peter Lorincz; Laura Lossi; Sophie Lotersztajn; Penny E Lovat; Jonathan F Lovell; Alenka Lovy; Péter Lőw; Guang Lu; Haocheng Lu; Jia-Hong Lu; Jin-Jian Lu; Mengji Lu; Shuyan Lu; Alessandro Luciani; John M Lucocq; Paula Ludovico; Micah A Luftig; Morten Luhr; Diego Luis-Ravelo; Julian J Lum; Liany Luna-Dulcey; Anders H Lund; Viktor K Lund; Jan D Lünemann; Patrick Lüningschrör; Honglin Luo; Rongcan Luo; Shouqing Luo; Zhi Luo; Claudio Luparello; Bernhard Lüscher; Luan Luu; Alex Lyakhovich; Konstantin G Lyamzaev; Alf Håkon Lystad; Lyubomyr Lytvynchuk; Alvin C Ma; Changle Ma; Mengxiao Ma; Ning-Fang Ma; Quan-Hong Ma; Xinliang Ma; Yueyun Ma; Zhenyi Ma; Ormond A MacDougald; Fernando Macian; Gustavo C MacIntosh; Jeffrey P MacKeigan; Kay F Macleod; Sandra Maday; Frank Madeo; Muniswamy Madesh; Tobias Madl; Julio Madrigal-Matute; Akiko Maeda; Yasuhiro Maejima; Marta Magarinos; Poornima Mahavadi; Emiliano Maiani; Kenneth Maiese; Panchanan Maiti; Maria Chiara Maiuri; Barbara Majello; Michael B Major; Elena Makareeva; Fayaz Malik; Karthik Mallilankaraman; Walter Malorni; Alina Maloyan; Najiba Mammadova; Gene Chi Wai Man; Federico Manai; Joseph D Mancias; Eva-Maria Mandelkow; Michael A Mandell; Angelo A Manfredi; Masoud H Manjili; Ravi Manjithaya; Patricio Manque; Bella B Manshian; Raquel Manzano; Claudia Manzoni; Kai Mao; Cinzia Marchese; Sandrine Marchetti; Anna Maria Marconi; Fabrizio Marcucci; Stefania Mardente; Olga A Mareninova; Marta Margeta; Muriel Mari; Sara Marinelli; Oliviero Marinelli; Guillermo Mariño; Sofia Mariotto; Richard S Marshall; Mark R Marten; Sascha Martens; Alexandre P J Martin; Katie R Martin; Sara Martin; Shaun Martin; Adrián Martín-Segura; Miguel A Martín-Acebes; Inmaculada Martin-Burriel; Marcos Martin-Rincon; Paloma Martin-Sanz; José A Martina; Wim Martinet; Aitor Martinez; Ana Martinez; Jennifer Martinez; Moises Martinez Velazquez; Nuria Martinez-Lopez; Marta Martinez-Vicente; Daniel O Martins; Joilson O Martins; Waleska K Martins; Tania Martins-Marques; Emanuele Marzetti; Shashank Masaldan; Celine Masclaux-Daubresse; Douglas G Mashek; Valentina Massa; Lourdes Massieu; Glenn R Masson; Laura Masuelli; Anatoliy I Masyuk; Tetyana V Masyuk; Paola Matarrese; Ander Matheu; Satoaki Matoba; Sachiko Matsuzaki; Pamela Mattar; Alessandro Matte; Domenico Mattoscio; José L Mauriz; Mario Mauthe; Caroline Mauvezin; Emanual Maverakis; Paola Maycotte; Johanna Mayer; Gianluigi Mazzoccoli; Cristina Mazzoni; Joseph R Mazzulli; Nami McCarty; Christine McDonald; Mitchell R McGill; Sharon L McKenna; BethAnn McLaughlin; Fionn McLoughlin; Mark A McNiven; Thomas G McWilliams; Fatima Mechta-Grigoriou; Tania Catarina Medeiros; Diego L Medina; Lynn A Megeney; Klara Megyeri; Maryam Mehrpour; Jawahar L Mehta; Alfred J Meijer; Annemarie H Meijer; Jakob Mejlvang; Alicia Meléndez; Annette Melk; Gonen Memisoglu; Alexandrina F Mendes; Delong Meng; Fei Meng; Tian Meng; Rubem Menna-Barreto; Manoj B Menon; Carol Mercer; Anne E Mercier; Jean-Louis Mergny; Adalberto Merighi; Seth D Merkley; Giuseppe Merla; Volker Meske; Ana Cecilia Mestre; Shree Padma Metur; Christian Meyer; Hemmo Meyer; Wenyi Mi; Jeanne Mialet-Perez; Junying Miao; Lucia Micale; Yasuo Miki; Enrico Milan; Małgorzata Milczarek; Dana L Miller; Samuel I Miller; Silke Miller; Steven W Millward; Ira Milosevic; Elena A Minina; Hamed Mirzaei; Hamid Reza Mirzaei; Mehdi Mirzaei; Amit Mishra; Nandita Mishra; Paras Kumar Mishra; Maja Misirkic Marjanovic; Roberta Misasi; Amit Misra; Gabriella Misso; Claire Mitchell; Geraldine Mitou; Tetsuji Miura; Shigeki Miyamoto; Makoto Miyazaki; Mitsunori Miyazaki; Taiga Miyazaki; Keisuke Miyazawa; Noboru Mizushima; Trine H Mogensen; Baharia Mograbi; Reza Mohammadinejad; Yasir Mohamud; Abhishek Mohanty; Sipra Mohapatra; Torsten Möhlmann; Asif Mohmmed; Anna Moles; Kelle H Moley; Maurizio Molinari; Vincenzo Mollace; Andreas Buch Møller; Bertrand Mollereau; Faustino Mollinedo; Costanza Montagna; Mervyn J Monteiro; Andrea Montella; L Ruth Montes; Barbara Montico; Vinod K Mony; Giacomo Monzio Compagnoni; Michael N Moore; Mohammad A Moosavi; Ana L Mora; Marina Mora; David Morales-Alamo; Rosario Moratalla; Paula I Moreira; Elena Morelli; Sandra Moreno; Daniel Moreno-Blas; Viviana Moresi; Benjamin Morga; Alwena H Morgan; Fabrice Morin; Hideaki Morishita; Orson L Moritz; Mariko Moriyama; Yuji Moriyasu; Manuela Morleo; Eugenia Morselli; Jose F Moruno-Manchon; Jorge Moscat; Serge Mostowy; Elisa Motori; Andrea Felinto Moura; Naima Moustaid-Moussa; Maria Mrakovcic; Gabriel Muciño-Hernández; Anupam Mukherjee; Subhadip Mukhopadhyay; Jean M Mulcahy Levy; Victoriano Mulero; Sylviane Muller; Christian Münch; Ashok Munjal; Pura Munoz-Canoves; Teresa Muñoz-Galdeano; Christian Münz; Tomokazu Murakawa; Claudia Muratori; Brona M Murphy; J Patrick Murphy; Aditya Murthy; Timo T Myöhänen; Indira U Mysorekar; Jennifer Mytych; Seyed Mohammad Nabavi; Massimo Nabissi; Péter Nagy; Jihoon Nah; Aimable Nahimana; Ichiro Nakagawa; Ken Nakamura; Hitoshi Nakatogawa; Shyam S Nandi; Meera Nanjundan; Monica Nanni; Gennaro Napolitano; Roberta Nardacci; Masashi Narita; Melissa Nassif; Ilana Nathan; Manabu Natsumeda; Ryno J Naude; Christin Naumann; Olaia Naveiras; Fatemeh Navid; Steffan T Nawrocki; Taras Y Nazarko; Francesca Nazio; Florentina Negoita; Thomas Neill; Amanda L Neisch; Luca M Neri; Mihai G Netea; Patrick Neubert; Thomas P Neufeld; Dietbert Neumann; Albert Neutzner; Phillip T Newton; Paul A Ney; Ioannis P Nezis; Charlene C W Ng; Tzi Bun Ng; Hang T T Nguyen; Long T Nguyen; Hong-Min Ni; Clíona Ní Cheallaigh; Zhenhong Ni; M Celeste Nicolao; Francesco Nicoli; Manuel Nieto-Diaz; Per Nilsson; Shunbin Ning; Rituraj Niranjan; Hiroshi Nishimune; Mireia Niso-Santano; Ralph A Nixon; Annalisa Nobili; Clevio Nobrega; Takeshi Noda; Uxía Nogueira-Recalde; Trevor M Nolan; Ivan Nombela; Ivana Novak; Beatriz Novoa; Takashi Nozawa; Nobuyuki Nukina; Carmen Nussbaum-Krammer; Jesper Nylandsted; Tracey R O'Donovan; Seónadh M O'Leary; Eyleen J O'Rourke; Mary P O'Sullivan; Timothy E O'Sullivan; Salvatore Oddo; Ina Oehme; Michinaga Ogawa; Eric Ogier-Denis; Margret H Ogmundsdottir; Besim Ogretmen; Goo Taeg Oh; Seon-Hee Oh; Young J Oh; Takashi Ohama; Yohei Ohashi; Masaki Ohmuraya; Vasileios Oikonomou; Rani Ojha; Koji Okamoto; Hitoshi Okazawa; Masahide Oku; Sara Oliván; Jorge M A Oliveira; Michael Ollmann; James A Olzmann; Shakib Omari; M Bishr Omary; Gizem Önal; Martin Ondrej; Sang-Bing Ong; Sang-Ging Ong; Anna Onnis; Juan A Orellana; Sara Orellana-Muñoz; Maria Del Mar Ortega-Villaizan; Xilma R Ortiz-Gonzalez; Elena Ortona; Heinz D Osiewacz; Abdel-Hamid K Osman; Rosario Osta; Marisa S Otegui; Kinya Otsu; Christiane Ott; Luisa Ottobrini; Jing-Hsiung James Ou; Tiago F Outeiro; Inger Oynebraten; Melek Ozturk; Gilles Pagès; Susanta Pahari; Marta Pajares; Utpal B Pajvani; Rituraj Pal; Simona Paladino; Nicolas Pallet; Michela Palmieri; Giuseppe Palmisano; Camilla Palumbo; Francesco Pampaloni; Lifeng Pan; Qingjun Pan; Wenliang Pan; Xin Pan; Ganna Panasyuk; Rahul Pandey; Udai B Pandey; Vrajesh Pandya; Francesco Paneni; Shirley Y Pang; Elisa Panzarini; Daniela L Papademetrio; Elena Papaleo; Daniel Papinski; Diana Papp; Eun Chan Park; Hwan Tae Park; Ji-Man Park; Jong-In Park; Joon Tae Park; Junsoo Park; Sang Chul Park; Sang-Youel Park; Abraham H Parola; Jan B Parys; Adrien Pasquier; Benoit Pasquier; João F Passos; Nunzia Pastore; Hemal H Patel; Daniel Patschan; Sophie Pattingre; Gustavo Pedraza-Alva; Jose Pedraza-Chaverri; Zully Pedrozo; Gang Pei; Jianming Pei; Hadas Peled-Zehavi; Joaquín M Pellegrini; Joffrey Pelletier; Miguel A Peñalva; Di Peng; Ying Peng; Fabio Penna; Maria Pennuto; Francesca Pentimalli; Cláudia Mf Pereira; Gustavo J S Pereira; Lilian C Pereira; Luis Pereira de Almeida; Nirma D Perera; Ángel Pérez-Lara; Ana B Perez-Oliva; María Esther Pérez-Pérez; Palsamy Periyasamy; Andras Perl; Cristiana Perrotta; Ida Perrotta; Richard G Pestell; Morten Petersen; Irina Petrache; Goran Petrovski; Thorsten Pfirrmann; Astrid S Pfister; Jennifer A Philips; Huifeng Pi; Anna Picca; Alicia M Pickrell; Sandy Picot; Giovanna M Pierantoni; Marina Pierdominici; Philippe Pierre; Valérie Pierrefite-Carle; Karolina Pierzynowska; Federico Pietrocola; Miroslawa Pietruczuk; Claudio Pignata; Felipe X Pimentel-Muiños; Mario Pinar; Roberta O Pinheiro; Ronit Pinkas-Kramarski; Paolo Pinton; Karolina Pircs; Sujan Piya; Paola Pizzo; Theo S Plantinga; Harald W Platta; Ainhoa Plaza-Zabala; Markus Plomann; Egor Y Plotnikov; Helene Plun-Favreau; Ryszard Pluta; Roger Pocock; Stefanie Pöggeler; Christian Pohl; Marc Poirot; Angelo Poletti; Marisa Ponpuak; Hana Popelka; Blagovesta Popova; Helena Porta; Soledad Porte Alcon; Eliana Portilla-Fernandez; Martin Post; Malia B Potts; Joanna Poulton; Ted Powers; Veena Prahlad; Tomasz K Prajsnar; Domenico Praticò; Rosaria Prencipe; Muriel Priault; Tassula Proikas-Cezanne; Vasilis J Promponas; Christopher G Proud; Rosa Puertollano; Luigi Puglielli; Thomas Pulinilkunnil; Deepika Puri; Rajat Puri; Julien Puyal; Xiaopeng Qi; Yongmei Qi; Wenbin Qian; Lei Qiang; Yu Qiu; Joe Quadrilatero; Jorge Quarleri; Nina Raben; Hannah Rabinowich; Debora Ragona; Michael J Ragusa; Nader Rahimi; Marveh Rahmati; Valeria Raia; Nuno Raimundo; Namakkal-Soorappan Rajasekaran; Sriganesh Ramachandra Rao; Abdelhaq Rami; Ignacio Ramírez-Pardo; David B Ramsden; Felix Randow; Pundi N Rangarajan; Danilo Ranieri; Hai Rao; Lang Rao; Rekha Rao; Sumit Rathore; J Arjuna Ratnayaka; Edward A Ratovitski; Palaniyandi Ravanan; Gloria Ravegnini; Swapan K Ray; Babak Razani; Vito Rebecca; Fulvio Reggiori; Anne Régnier-Vigouroux; Andreas S Reichert; David Reigada; Jan H Reiling; Theo Rein; Siegfried Reipert; Rokeya Sultana Rekha; Hongmei Ren; Jun Ren; Weichao Ren; Tristan Renault; Giorgia Renga; Karen Reue; Kim Rewitz; Bruna Ribeiro de Andrade Ramos; S Amer Riazuddin; Teresa M Ribeiro-Rodrigues; Jean-Ehrland Ricci; Romeo Ricci; Victoria Riccio; Des R Richardson; Yasuko Rikihisa; Makarand V Risbud; Ruth M Risueño; Konstantinos Ritis; Salvatore Rizza; Rosario Rizzuto; Helen C Roberts; Luke D Roberts; Katherine J Robinson; Maria Carmela Roccheri; Stephane Rocchi; George G Rodney; Tiago Rodrigues; Vagner Ramon Rodrigues Silva; Amaia Rodriguez; Ruth Rodriguez-Barrueco; Nieves Rodriguez-Henche; Humberto Rodriguez-Rocha; Jeroen Roelofs; Robert S Rogers; Vladimir V Rogov; Ana I Rojo; Krzysztof Rolka; Vanina Romanello; Luigina Romani; Alessandra Romano; Patricia S Romano; David Romeo-Guitart; Luis C Romero; Montserrat Romero; Joseph C Roney; Christopher Rongo; Sante Roperto; Mathias T Rosenfeldt; Philip Rosenstiel; Anne G Rosenwald; Kevin A Roth; Lynn Roth; Steven Roth; Kasper M A Rouschop; Benoit D Roussel; Sophie Roux; Patrizia Rovere-Querini; Ajit Roy; Aurore Rozieres; Diego Ruano; David C Rubinsztein; Maria P Rubtsova; Klaus Ruckdeschel; Christoph Ruckenstuhl; Emil Rudolf; Rüdiger Rudolf; Alessandra Ruggieri; Avnika Ashok Ruparelia; Paola Rusmini; Ryan R Russell; Gian Luigi Russo; Maria Russo; Rossella Russo; Oxana O Ryabaya; Kevin M Ryan; Kwon-Yul Ryu; Maria Sabater-Arcis; Ulka Sachdev; Michael Sacher; Carsten Sachse; Abhishek Sadhu; Junichi Sadoshima; Nathaniel Safren; Paul Saftig; Antonia P Sagona; Gaurav Sahay; Amirhossein Sahebkar; Mustafa Sahin; Ozgur Sahin; Sumit Sahni; Nayuta Saito; Shigeru Saito; Tsunenori Saito; Ryohei Sakai; Yasuyoshi Sakai; Jun-Ichi Sakamaki; Kalle Saksela; Gloria Salazar; Anna Salazar-Degracia; Ghasem H Salekdeh; Ashok K Saluja; Belém Sampaio-Marques; Maria Cecilia Sanchez; Jose A Sanchez-Alcazar; Victoria Sanchez-Vera; Vanessa Sancho-Shimizu; J Thomas Sanderson; Marco Sandri; Stefano Santaguida; Laura Santambrogio; Magda M Santana; Giorgio Santoni; Alberto Sanz; Pascual Sanz; Shweta Saran; Marco Sardiello; Timothy J Sargeant; Apurva Sarin; Chinmoy Sarkar; Sovan Sarkar; Maria-Rosa Sarrias; Surajit Sarkar; Dipanka Tanu Sarmah; Jaakko Sarparanta; Aishwarya Sathyanarayan; Ranganayaki Sathyanarayanan; K Matthew Scaglione; Francesca Scatozza; Liliana Schaefer; Zachary T Schafer; Ulrich E Schaible; Anthony H V Schapira; Michael Scharl; Hermann M Schatzl; Catherine H Schein; Wiep Scheper; David Scheuring; Maria Vittoria Schiaffino; Monica Schiappacassi; Rainer Schindl; Uwe Schlattner; Oliver Schmidt; Roland Schmitt; Stephen D Schmidt; Ingo Schmitz; Eran Schmukler; Anja Schneider; Bianca E Schneider; Romana Schober; Alejandra C Schoijet; Micah B Schott; Michael Schramm; Bernd Schröder; Kai Schuh; Christoph Schüller; Ryan J Schulze; Lea Schürmanns; Jens C Schwamborn; Melanie Schwarten; Filippo Scialo; Sebastiano Sciarretta; Melanie J Scott; Kathleen W Scotto; A Ivana Scovassi; Andrea Scrima; Aurora Scrivo; David Sebastian; Salwa Sebti; Simon Sedej; Laura Segatori; Nava Segev; Per O Seglen; Iban Seiliez; Ekihiro Seki; Scott B Selleck; Frank W Sellke; Joshua T Selsby; Michael Sendtner; Serif Senturk; Elena Seranova; Consolato Sergi; Ruth Serra-Moreno; Hiromi Sesaki; Carmine Settembre; Subba Rao Gangi Setty; Gianluca Sgarbi; Ou Sha; John J Shacka; Javeed A Shah; Dantong Shang; Changshun Shao; Feng Shao; Soroush Sharbati; Lisa M Sharkey; Dipali Sharma; Gaurav Sharma; Kulbhushan Sharma; Pawan Sharma; Surendra Sharma; Han-Ming Shen; Hongtao Shen; Jiangang Shen; Ming Shen; Weili Shen; Zheni Shen; Rui Sheng; Zhi Sheng; Zu-Hang Sheng; Jianjian Shi; Xiaobing Shi; Ying-Hong Shi; Kahori Shiba-Fukushima; Jeng-Jer Shieh; Yohta Shimada; Shigeomi Shimizu; Makoto Shimozawa; Takahiro Shintani; Christopher J Shoemaker; Shahla Shojaei; Ikuo Shoji; Bhupendra V Shravage; Viji Shridhar; Chih-Wen Shu; Hong-Bing Shu; Ke Shui; Arvind K Shukla; Timothy E Shutt; Valentina Sica; Aleem Siddiqui; Amanda Sierra; Virginia Sierra-Torre; Santiago Signorelli; Payel Sil; Bruno J de Andrade Silva; Johnatas D Silva; Eduardo Silva-Pavez; Sandrine Silvente-Poirot; Rachel E Simmonds; Anna Katharina Simon; Hans-Uwe Simon; Matias Simons; Anurag Singh; Lalit P Singh; Rajat Singh; Shivendra V Singh; Shrawan K Singh; Sudha B Singh; Sunaina Singh; Surinder Pal Singh; Debasish Sinha; Rohit Anthony Sinha; Sangita Sinha; Agnieszka Sirko; Kapil Sirohi; Efthimios L Sivridis; Panagiotis Skendros; Aleksandra Skirycz; Iva Slaninová; Soraya S Smaili; Andrei Smertenko; Matthew D Smith; Stefaan J Soenen; Eun Jung Sohn; Sophia P M Sok; Giancarlo Solaini; Thierry Soldati; Scott A Soleimanpour; Rosa M Soler; Alexei Solovchenko; Jason A Somarelli; Avinash Sonawane; Fuyong Song; Hyun Kyu Song; Ju-Xian Song; Kunhua Song; Zhiyin Song; Leandro R Soria; Maurizio Sorice; Alexander A Soukas; Sandra-Fausia Soukup; Diana Sousa; Nadia Sousa; Paul A Spagnuolo; Stephen A Spector; M M Srinivas Bharath; Daret St Clair; Venturina Stagni; Leopoldo Staiano; Clint A Stalnecker; Metodi V Stankov; Peter B Stathopulos; Katja Stefan; Sven Marcel Stefan; Leonidas Stefanis; Joan S Steffan; Alexander Steinkasserer; Harald Stenmark; Jared Sterneckert; Craig Stevens; Veronika Stoka; Stephan Storch; Björn Stork; Flavie Strappazzon; Anne Marie Strohecker; Dwayne G Stupack; Huanxing Su; Ling-Yan Su; Longxiang Su; Ana M Suarez-Fontes; Carlos S Subauste; Selvakumar Subbian; Paula V Subirada; Ganapasam Sudhandiran; Carolyn M Sue; Xinbing Sui; Corey Summers; Guangchao Sun; Jun Sun; Kang Sun; Meng-Xiang Sun; Qiming Sun; Yi Sun; Zhongjie Sun; Karen K S Sunahara; Eva Sundberg; Katalin Susztak; Peter Sutovsky; Hidekazu Suzuki; Gary Sweeney; J David Symons; Stephen Cho Wing Sze; Nathaniel J Szewczyk; Anna Tabęcka-Łonczynska; Claudio Tabolacci; Frank Tacke; Heinrich Taegtmeyer; Marco Tafani; Mitsuo Tagaya; Haoran Tai; Stephen W G Tait; Yoshinori Takahashi; Szabolcs Takats; Priti Talwar; Chit Tam; Shing Yau Tam; Davide Tampellini; Atsushi Tamura; Chong Teik Tan; Eng-King Tan; Ya-Qin Tan; Masaki Tanaka; Motomasa Tanaka; Daolin Tang; Jingfeng Tang; Tie-Shan Tang; Isei Tanida; Zhipeng Tao; Mohammed Taouis; Lars Tatenhorst; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Allen Taylor; Gregory A Taylor; Joan M Taylor; Elena Tchetina; Andrew R Tee; Irmgard Tegeder; David Teis; Natercia Teixeira; Fatima Teixeira-Clerc; Kumsal A Tekirdag; Tewin Tencomnao; Sandra Tenreiro; Alexei V Tepikin; Pilar S Testillano; Gianluca Tettamanti; Pierre-Louis Tharaux; Kathrin Thedieck; Arvind A Thekkinghat; Stefano Thellung; Josephine W Thinwa; V P Thirumalaikumar; Sufi Mary Thomas; Paul G Thomes; Andrew Thorburn; Lipi Thukral; Thomas Thum; Michael Thumm; Ling Tian; Ales Tichy; Andreas Till; Vincent Timmerman; Vladimir I Titorenko; Sokol V Todi; Krassimira Todorova; Janne M Toivonen; Luana Tomaipitinca; Dhanendra Tomar; Cristina Tomas-Zapico; Sergej Tomić; Benjamin Chun-Kit Tong; Chao Tong; Xin Tong; Sharon A Tooze; Maria L Torgersen; Satoru Torii; Liliana Torres-López; Alicia Torriglia; Christina G Towers; Roberto Towns; Shinya Toyokuni; Vladimir Trajkovic; Donatella Tramontano; Quynh-Giao Tran; Leonardo H Travassos; Charles B Trelford; Shirley Tremel; Ioannis P Trougakos; Betty P Tsao; Mario P Tschan; Hung-Fat Tse; Tak Fu Tse; Hitoshi Tsugawa; Andrey S Tsvetkov; David A Tumbarello; Yasin Tumtas; María J Tuñón; Sandra Turcotte; Boris Turk; Vito Turk; Bradley J Turner; Richard I Tuxworth; Jessica K Tyler; Elena V Tyutereva; Yasuo Uchiyama; Aslihan Ugun-Klusek; Holm H Uhlig; Marzena Ułamek-Kozioł; Ilya V Ulasov; Midori Umekawa; Christian Ungermann; Rei Unno; Sylvie Urbe; Elisabet Uribe-Carretero; Suayib Üstün; Vladimir N Uversky; Thomas Vaccari; Maria I Vaccaro; Björn F Vahsen; Helin Vakifahmetoglu-Norberg; Rut Valdor; Maria J Valente; Ayelén Valko; Richard B Vallee; Angela M Valverde; Greet Van den Berghe; Stijn van der Veen; Luc Van Kaer; Jorg van Loosdregt; Sjoerd J L van Wijk; Wim Vandenberghe; Ilse Vanhorebeek; Marcos A Vannier-Santos; Nicola Vannini; M Cristina Vanrell; Chiara Vantaggiato; Gabriele Varano; Isabel Varela-Nieto; Máté Varga; M Helena Vasconcelos; Somya Vats; Demetrios G Vavvas; Ignacio Vega-Naredo; Silvia Vega-Rubin-de-Celis; Guillermo Velasco; Ariadna P Velázquez; Tibor Vellai; Edo Vellenga; Francesca Velotti; Mireille Verdier; Panayotis Verginis; Isabelle Vergne; Paul Verkade; Manish Verma; Patrik Verstreken; Tim Vervliet; Jörg Vervoorts; Alexandre T Vessoni; Victor M Victor; Michel Vidal; Chiara Vidoni; Otilia V Vieira; Richard D Vierstra; Sonia Viganó; Helena Vihinen; Vinoy Vijayan; Miquel Vila; Marçal Vilar; José M Villalba; Antonio Villalobo; Beatriz Villarejo-Zori; Francesc Villarroya; Joan Villarroya; Olivier Vincent; Cecile Vindis; Christophe Viret; Maria Teresa Viscomi; Dora Visnjic; Ilio Vitale; David J Vocadlo; Olga V Voitsekhovskaja; Cinzia Volonté; Mattia Volta; Marta Vomero; Clarissa Von Haefen; Marc A Vooijs; Wolfgang Voos; Ljubica Vucicevic; Richard Wade-Martins; Satoshi Waguri; Kenrick A Waite; Shuji Wakatsuki; David W Walker; Mark J Walker; Simon A Walker; Jochen Walter; Francisco G Wandosell; Bo Wang; Chao-Yung Wang; Chen Wang; Chenran Wang; Chenwei Wang; Cun-Yu Wang; Dong Wang; Fangyang Wang; Feng Wang; Fengming Wang; Guansong Wang; Han Wang; Hao Wang; Hexiang Wang; Hong-Gang Wang; Jianrong Wang; Jigang Wang; Jiou Wang; Jundong Wang; Kui Wang; Lianrong Wang; Liming Wang; Maggie Haitian Wang; Meiqing Wang; Nanbu Wang; Pengwei Wang; Peipei Wang; Ping Wang; Ping Wang; Qing Jun Wang; Qing Wang; Qing Kenneth Wang; Qiong A Wang; Wen-Tao Wang; Wuyang Wang; Xinnan Wang; Xuejun Wang; Yan Wang; Yanchang Wang; Yanzhuang Wang; Yen-Yun Wang; Yihua Wang; Yipeng Wang; Yu Wang; Yuqi Wang; Zhe Wang; Zhenyu Wang; Zhouguang Wang; Gary Warnes; Verena Warnsmann; Hirotaka Watada; Eizo Watanabe; Maxinne Watchon; Anna Wawrzyńska; Timothy E Weaver; Grzegorz Wegrzyn; Ann M Wehman; Huafeng Wei; Lei Wei; Taotao Wei; Yongjie Wei; Oliver H Weiergräber; Conrad C Weihl; Günther Weindl; Ralf Weiskirchen; Alan Wells; Runxia H Wen; Xin Wen; Antonia Werner; Beatrice Weykopf; Sally P Wheatley; J Lindsay Whitton; Alexander J Whitworth; Katarzyna Wiktorska; Manon E Wildenberg; Tom Wileman; Simon Wilkinson; Dieter Willbold; Brett Williams; Robin S B Williams; Roger L Williams; Peter R Williamson; Richard A Wilson; Beate Winner; Nathaniel J Winsor; Steven S Witkin; Harald Wodrich; Ute Woehlbier; Thomas Wollert; Esther Wong; Jack Ho Wong; Richard W Wong; Vincent Kam Wai Wong; W Wei-Lynn Wong; An-Guo Wu; Chengbiao Wu; Jian Wu; Junfang Wu; Kenneth K Wu; Min Wu; Shan-Ying Wu; Shengzhou Wu; Shu-Yan Wu; Shufang Wu; William K K Wu; Xiaohong Wu; Xiaoqing Wu; Yao-Wen Wu; Yihua Wu; Ramnik J Xavier; Hongguang Xia; Lixin Xia; Zhengyuan Xia; Ge Xiang; Jin Xiang; Mingliang Xiang; Wei Xiang; Bin Xiao; Guozhi Xiao; Hengyi Xiao; Hong-Tao Xiao; Jian Xiao; Lan Xiao; Shi Xiao; Yin Xiao; Baoming Xie; Chuan-Ming Xie; Min Xie; Yuxiang Xie; Zhiping Xie; Zhonglin Xie; Maria Xilouri; Congfeng Xu; En Xu; Haoxing Xu; Jing Xu; JinRong Xu; Liang Xu; Wen Wen Xu; Xiulong Xu; Yu Xue; Sokhna M S Yakhine-Diop; Masamitsu Yamaguchi; Osamu Yamaguchi; Ai Yamamoto; Shunhei Yamashina; Shengmin Yan; Shian-Jang Yan; Zhen Yan; Yasuo Yanagi; Chuanbin Yang; Dun-Sheng Yang; Huan Yang; Huang-Tian Yang; Hui Yang; Jin-Ming Yang; Jing Yang; Jingyu Yang; Ling Yang; Liu Yang; Ming Yang; Pei-Ming Yang; Qian Yang; Seungwon Yang; Shu Yang; Shun-Fa Yang; Wannian Yang; Wei Yuan Yang; Xiaoyong Yang; Xuesong Yang; Yi Yang; Ying Yang; Honghong Yao; Shenggen Yao; Xiaoqiang Yao; Yong-Gang Yao; Yong-Ming Yao; Takahiro Yasui; Meysam Yazdankhah; Paul M Yen; Cong Yi; Xiao-Ming Yin; Yanhai Yin; Zhangyuan Yin; Ziyi Yin; Meidan Ying; Zheng Ying; Calvin K Yip; Stephanie Pei Tung Yiu; Young H Yoo; Kiyotsugu Yoshida; Saori R Yoshii; Tamotsu Yoshimori; Bahman Yousefi; Boxuan Yu; Haiyang Yu; Jun Yu; Jun Yu; Li Yu; Ming-Lung Yu; Seong-Woon Yu; Victor C Yu; W Haung Yu; Zhengping Yu; Zhou Yu; Junying Yuan; Ling-Qing Yuan; Shilin Yuan; Shyng-Shiou F Yuan; Yanggang Yuan; Zengqiang Yuan; Jianbo Yue; Zhenyu Yue; Jeanho Yun; Raymond L Yung; David N Zacks; Gabriele Zaffagnini; Vanessa O Zambelli; Isabella Zanella; Qun S Zang; Sara Zanivan; Silvia Zappavigna; Pilar Zaragoza; Konstantinos S Zarbalis; Amir Zarebkohan; Amira Zarrouk; Scott O Zeitlin; Jialiu Zeng; Ju-Deng Zeng; Eva Žerovnik; Lixuan Zhan; Bin Zhang; Donna D Zhang; Hanlin Zhang; Hong Zhang; Hong Zhang; Honghe Zhang; Huafeng Zhang; Huaye Zhang; Hui Zhang; Hui-Ling Zhang; Jianbin Zhang; Jianhua Zhang; Jing-Pu Zhang; Kalin Y B Zhang; Leshuai W Zhang; Lin Zhang; Lisheng Zhang; Lu Zhang; Luoying Zhang; Menghuan Zhang; Peng Zhang; Sheng Zhang; Wei Zhang; Xiangnan Zhang; Xiao-Wei Zhang; Xiaolei Zhang; Xiaoyan Zhang; Xin Zhang; Xinxin Zhang; Xu Dong Zhang; Yang Zhang; Yanjin Zhang; Yi Zhang; Ying-Dong Zhang; Yingmei Zhang; Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Yuchen Zhang; Zhe Zhang; Zhengguang Zhang; Zhibing Zhang; Zhihai Zhang; Zhiyong Zhang; Zili Zhang; Haobin Zhao; Lei Zhao; Shuang Zhao; Tongbiao Zhao; Xiao-Fan Zhao; Ying Zhao; Yongchao Zhao; Yongliang Zhao; Yuting Zhao; Guoping Zheng; Kai Zheng; Ling Zheng; Shizhong Zheng; Xi-Long Zheng; Yi Zheng; Zu-Guo Zheng; Boris Zhivotovsky; Qing Zhong; Ao Zhou; Ben Zhou; Cefan Zhou; Gang Zhou; Hao Zhou; Hong Zhou; Hongbo Zhou; Jie Zhou; Jing Zhou; Jing Zhou; Jiyong Zhou; Kailiang Zhou; Rongjia Zhou; Xu-Jie Zhou; Yanshuang Zhou; Yinghong Zhou; Yubin Zhou; Zheng-Yu Zhou; Zhou Zhou; Binglin Zhu; Changlian Zhu; Guo-Qing Zhu; Haining Zhu; Hongxin Zhu; Hua Zhu; Wei-Guo Zhu; Yanping Zhu; Yushan Zhu; Haixia Zhuang; Xiaohong Zhuang; Katarzyna Zientara-Rytter; Christine M Zimmermann; Elena Ziviani; Teresa Zoladek; Wei-Xing Zong; Dmitry B Zorov; Antonio Zorzano; Weiping Zou; Zhen Zou; Zhengzhi Zou; Steven Zuryn; Werner Zwerschke; Beate Brand-Saberi; X Charlie Dong; Chandra Shekar Kenchappa; Zuguo Li; Yong Lin; Shigeru Oshima; Yueguang Rong; Judith C Sluimer; Christina L Stallings; Chun-Kit Tong Journal: Autophagy Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 13.391