Rachel Saunders-Pullman1,2, Anat Mirelman3,4,5,6, Roy N Alcalay7, Cuiling Wang7,8,9, Roberto A Ortega1,2, Deborah Raymond1,2, Helen Mejia-Santana5, Martha Orbe-Reilly5, Brooke A Johannes1,2, Avner Thaler3,4,6, Laurie Ozelius10, Avi Orr-Urtreger3,4,6,11, Karen S Marder7,12, Nir Giladi3,4,6, Susan B Bressman1,2. 1. Department of Neurology, Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York. 2. Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 3. Movement Disorders Unit, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. 4. Sackler School of Medicine, Sagol School for Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 5. Department of Physical Therapy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 6. Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 7. Department of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York. 8. Department of Epidemiology and Family Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University, Bronx, New York. 9. Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University, Bronx, New York. 10. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston. 11. Genetic Institute, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. 12. Taub Institute for Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Abstract
Importance: Few prospective longitudinal studies have evaluated the progression of Parkinson disease (PD) in patients with the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2 [OMIM 609007]) mutation. Knowledge about such progression will aid clinical trials. Objective: To determine whether the longitudinal course of PD in patients with the LRRK2 mutation differs from the longitudinal course of PD in patients without the mutation. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective comprehensive assessment of a large cohort of patients from 3 sites with LRRK2 PD or with nonmutation PD was conducted from July 21, 2009, to September 30, 2016. All patients of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry with PD were approached at each site; approximately 80% agreed to an initial visit. A total of 545 patients of Ashkenazi Jewish descent with PD who had 1 to 4 study visits were evaluated. A total of 144 patients (26.4%) had the LRRK2 G2019S mutation. Patients with GBA (OMIM 606463) mutations were excluded from the analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Linear mixed-effects models for longitudinal motor scores were used to examine the association of LRRK2 mutation status with the rate of change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III scores using disease duration as the time scale, adjusting for sex, site, age, disease duration, cognitive score, and levodopa-equivalent dose at baseline. Mixed-effects models were used to assess change in cognition, as measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores. Results: Among the 545 participants, 233 were women, 312 were men, and the mean (SD) age was 68.2 (9.1) years for participants with the LRRK2 mutation and 67.8 (10.7) years for those without it. Seventy-two of 144 participants with the LRRK2 mutation and 161 of 401 participants with no mutation were women. The estimate (SE) of the rate of change in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III motor score per year among those with the LRRK2 mutation (0.689 [0.192] points per year) was less than among those without the mutation (1.056 [0.187] points per year; difference, -0.367 [0.149] points per year; P = .02). The estimate (SE) of the difference in the rate of change of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score between those with the LRRK2 mutation (-0.096 [0.090] points per year) and those without the mutation (-0.192 [0.102] points per year) did not reach statistical significance (difference, 0.097 [0.055] points per year; P = .08). Conclusions and Relevance: Prospective longitudinal follow-up of patients with PD with or without the LRRK2 G2019S mutation supports data from a cross-sectional study and demonstrates a slower decline in motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scores among those with LRRK2 G2019S-associated PD.
Importance: Few prospective longitudinal studies have evaluated the progression of Parkinson disease (PD) in patients with the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2 [OMIM 609007]) mutation. Knowledge about such progression will aid clinical trials. Objective: To determine whether the longitudinal course of PD in patients with the LRRK2 mutation differs from the longitudinal course of PD in patients without the mutation. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective comprehensive assessment of a large cohort of patients from 3 sites with LRRK2PD or with nonmutation PD was conducted from July 21, 2009, to September 30, 2016. All patients of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry with PD were approached at each site; approximately 80% agreed to an initial visit. A total of 545 patients of Ashkenazi Jewish descent with PD who had 1 to 4 study visits were evaluated. A total of 144 patients (26.4%) had the LRRK2G2019S mutation. Patients with GBA (OMIM 606463) mutations were excluded from the analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Linear mixed-effects models for longitudinal motor scores were used to examine the association of LRRK2 mutation status with the rate of change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III scores using disease duration as the time scale, adjusting for sex, site, age, disease duration, cognitive score, and levodopa-equivalent dose at baseline. Mixed-effects models were used to assess change in cognition, as measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores. Results: Among the 545 participants, 233 were women, 312 were men, and the mean (SD) age was 68.2 (9.1) years for participants with the LRRK2 mutation and 67.8 (10.7) years for those without it. Seventy-two of 144 participants with the LRRK2 mutation and 161 of 401 participants with no mutation were women. The estimate (SE) of the rate of change in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III motor score per year among those with the LRRK2 mutation (0.689 [0.192] points per year) was less than among those without the mutation (1.056 [0.187] points per year; difference, -0.367 [0.149] points per year; P = .02). The estimate (SE) of the difference in the rate of change of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score between those with the LRRK2 mutation (-0.096 [0.090] points per year) and those without the mutation (-0.192 [0.102] points per year) did not reach statistical significance (difference, 0.097 [0.055] points per year; P = .08). Conclusions and Relevance: Prospective longitudinal follow-up of patients with PD with or without the LRRK2G2019S mutation supports data from a cross-sectional study and demonstrates a slower decline in motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scores among those with LRRK2G2019S-associated PD.
Authors: Carles Gaig; María José Martí; Mario Ezquerra; Maria Jesús Rey; Adriana Cardozo; Eduardo Tolosa Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2007-01-08 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Sarra Nazem; Andrew D Siderowf; John E Duda; Tom Ten Have; Amy Colcher; Stacy S Horn; Paul J Moberg; Jayne R Wilkinson; Howard I Hurtig; Matthew B Stern; Daniel Weintraub Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Cindy Zadikoff; Susan H Fox; David F Tang-Wai; Teri Thomsen; Rob M A de Bie; Pettarusup Wadia; Janis Miyasaki; Sarah Duff-Canning; Anthony E Lang; Connie Marras Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2008-01-30 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Roy N Alcalay; Anat Mirelman; Rachel Saunders-Pullman; Ming-X Tang; Helen Mejia Santana; Deborah Raymond; Ernest Roos; Martha Orbe-Reilly; Tanya Gurevich; Anat Bar Shira; Mali Gana Weisz; Kira Yasinovsky; Maayan Zalis; Avner Thaler; Andres Deik; Matthew James Barrett; Jose Cabassa; Mark Groves; Ann L Hunt; Naomi Lubarr; Marta San Luciano; Joan Miravite; Christina Palmese; Rivka Sachdev; Harini Sarva; Lawrence Severt; Vicki Shanker; Matthew Carrington Swan; Jeannie Soto-Valencia; Brooke Johannes; Robert Ortega; Stanley Fahn; Lucien Cote; Cheryl Waters; Pietro Mazzoni; Blair Ford; Elan Louis; Oren Levy; Llency Rosado; Diana Ruiz; Tsvyatko Dorovski; Michael Pauciulo; William Nichols; Avi Orr-Urtreger; Laurie Ozelius; Lorraine Clark; Nir Giladi; Susan Bressman; Karen S Marder Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Thomas F Tropea; Jordan Mak; Michael H Guo; Sharon X Xie; Eunran Suh; Jacqueline Rick; Andrew Siderowf; Daniel Weintraub; Murray Grossman; David Irwin; David A Wolk; John Q Trojanowski; Vivianna Van Deerlin; Alice S Chen-Plotkin Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Katharina A Schindlbeck; An Vo; Nha Nguyen; Chris C Tang; Martin Niethammer; Vijay Dhawan; Vicky Brandt; Rachel Saunders-Pullman; Susan B Bressman; David Eidelberg Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Tanya Simuni; Michael C Brumm; Liz Uribe; Chelsea Caspell-Garcia; Christopher S Coffey; Andrew Siderowf; Roy N Alcalay; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie M Shaw; John Seibyl; Andrew Singleton; Arthur W Toga; Doug Galasko; Tatiana Foroud; Kelly Nudelman; Duygu Tosun-Turgut; Kathleen Poston; Daniel Weintraub; Brit Mollenhauer; Caroline M Tanner; Karl Kieburtz; Lana M Chahine; Alyssa Reimer; Samantha Hutten; Susan Bressman; Kenneth Marek Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 10.338