Literature DB >> 29308957

Validity of eyeball estimation for range of motion during the cervical flexion rotation test compared to an ultrasound-based movement analysis system.

Axel Schäfer1, Kerstin Lüdtke2, Franziska Breuel3, Nikolas Gerloff3, Maren Knust3, Christian Kollitsch3, Alex Laukart3, Laura Matej3, Antje Müller3, Thomas Schöttker-Königer3, Toby Hall4.   

Abstract

Headache is a common and costly health problem. Although pathogenesis of headache is heterogeneous, one reported contributing factor is dysfunction of the upper cervical spine. The flexion rotation test (FRT) is a commonly used diagnostic test to detect upper cervical movement impairment. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate concurrent validity of detecting high cervical ROM impairment during the FRT by comparing measurements established by an ultrasound-based system (gold standard) with eyeball estimation. Secondary aim was to investigate intra-rater reliability of FRT ROM eyeball estimation. The examiner (6 years experience) was blinded to the data from the ultrasound-based device and to the symptoms of the patients. FRT test result (positive or negative) was based on visual estimation of range of rotation less than 34° to either side. Concurrently, range of rotation was evaluated using the ultrasound-based device. A total of 43 subjects with headache (79% female), mean age of 35.05 years (SD 13.26) were included. According to the International Headache Society Classification 23 subjects had migraine, 4 tension type headache, and 16 multiple headache forms. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 and 0.89 for combined rotation, indicating good concurrent reliability. The area under the ROC curve was 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.98) for rotation to both sides. Intra-rater reliability for eyeball estimation was excellent with Fleiss Kappa 0.79 for right rotation and left rotation. The results of this study indicate that the FRT is a valid and reliable test to detect impairment of upper cervical ROM in patients with headache.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical Spine; flexion rotation test; headache; range of motion; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29308957     DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1423523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract        ISSN: 0959-3985            Impact factor:   2.279


  4 in total

1.  The C0-C2 axial rotation test: normal values, intra- and inter-rater reliability and correlation with the flexion rotation test in normal subjects.

Authors:  Kiran Satpute; Sadaf Nalband; Toby Hall
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-10-12

2.  Effects of SNAG mobilization combined with a self-SNAG home-exercise for the treatment of cervicogenic headache: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Paquin; Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme; Jean-Pierre Dumas
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-02-05

3.  Concurrent validity and reliability of measuring range of motion during the cervical flexion rotation test with a novel digital goniometer.

Authors:  Kerstin Luedtke; Thomas Schoettker-Königer; Toby Hall; Christine Reimer; Maike Grassold; Petra Hasselhoff-Styhler; Christian Neulinger; Max Obrocki; Philipp Przyhoda; Axel Schäfer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Measurement of range-of-motion in infants with indications of upper cervical dysfunction using the Flexion-Rotation-Test and Lateral-Flexion-Test: a blinded inter-rater reliability study in a clinical practice setting.

Authors:  Femke Driehuis; Noël L W Keijsers; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Rob A De Bie; J Bart Staal; Thomas J Hoogeboom
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2020-04-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.