Kristy Truong1, Henry T Hoffman1, Bruno Policeni2, Joan Maley2. 1. 1 Department of Otolaryngology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 2. 2 Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the pathophysiology of contrast extravasation. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-five sialograms at the University of Iowa from 2008 to 2016 were reviewed. RESULTS: Twelve sialograms (4.7% of total) were identified with main ductal extravasation. In each case, ductal stenosis as a diagnosis was supported by clinical history and the finding of difficulty in advancing the cannula into the duct during sialography. In all but 1 case, extravasation occurred at the distal duct with no further imaging of the ductal system. Each of the 5 cases treated with sialendoscopy with or without gland resection confirmed stenosis. Ultrasound evaluation of 5 of the cases detected ductal dilation in 4 (80%). Six of 11 computed tomography scans done before the sialogram were interpreted as normal with indirect evidence for ductal stenosis (duct dilation) reported in only 1. All extravasations were associated with either stricture alone or stricture with stone (1 case). CONCLUSION: Radiocontrast extravasation from the main duct during sialography is highly associated with the presence of ductal stricture. In our experience, the inability to fill the ductal system with radiocontrast is a useful sialographic finding that correlated closely with anatomic abnormality rather than technical error. The frequent finding of extravasation of radiocontrast supports the use of water soluble contrast.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the pathophysiology of contrast extravasation. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-five sialograms at the University of Iowa from 2008 to 2016 were reviewed. RESULTS: Twelve sialograms (4.7% of total) were identified with main ductal extravasation. In each case, ductal stenosis as a diagnosis was supported by clinical history and the finding of difficulty in advancing the cannula into the duct during sialography. In all but 1 case, extravasation occurred at the distal duct with no further imaging of the ductal system. Each of the 5 cases treated with sialendoscopy with or without gland resection confirmed stenosis. Ultrasound evaluation of 5 of the cases detected ductal dilation in 4 (80%). Six of 11 computed tomography scans done before the sialogram were interpreted as normal with indirect evidence for ductal stenosis (duct dilation) reported in only 1. All extravasations were associated with either stricture alone or stricture with stone (1 case). CONCLUSION: Radiocontrast extravasation from the main duct during sialography is highly associated with the presence of ductal stricture. In our experience, the inability to fill the ductal system with radiocontrast is a useful sialographic finding that correlated closely with anatomic abnormality rather than technical error. The frequent finding of extravasation of radiocontrast supports the use of water soluble contrast.