Nasrin Khanmohammadi1, Hamid Reza Sameni1, Moslem Mohammadi2, Abbas Pakdel1, Majid Mirmohammadkhani3, Houman Parsaie1, Sam Zarbakhsh4. 1. Research Center of Nervous System Stem Cells, Faculty of Medicine, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran. 2. Molecular and Cell Biology Research Center, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran. 3. Research Center for Social Determinants of Health Community Medicine Department, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran. 4. Research Center of Nervous System Stem Cells, Faculty of Medicine, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran. Electronic address: smzarbakhsh@gmail.com.
Chemotherapy is a standard treatment for most
forms of malignancies such as breast, cervix and
ovaries cancers (1). Despite all the benefits of
chemotherapy, it may damage ovaries by destroying
primordial oocytes, leading to premature ovarian
failure (POF) or early menopause (2). POF is described
as secondary infertility induced by alteration in the
levels of gonadotropin before the age of 40 (3).
Since chemotherapy can increase the risk of sexual
dysfunction and infertility (4), it could become a
problematic issue in case of girls and young women
undergoing chemotherapy (5). Cyclophosphamide
(CTX) is one of the most common drugs used in
chemotherapy that directly destroys oocytes and
stimulates follicular depletion (6, 7).Hormone therapy is sometimes used to treat common
menopausal problems. But, as hormone therapy mayincrease the risk of cancer or relapse in cancer survivors,
so an alternative treatment is required (2). One approach
that has recently been noted is stem cell therapy that seemsto be effective in the treatment of infertility in CTX-
treated female mice (8, 9). Bone marrow stromal cells(BMSCs) are a type of mesenchymal stem cells that havethe ability to differentiate into other cell lines and may be
able to replace damaged cells (10). Moreover, BMSCs canproduce growth factors and cytokines for angiogenesis,
mitogenesis and anti-apoptosis such as vascular endothelial
growth factor (VEGF), insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF1),
basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and hepatocytegrowth factor (HGF) (11-13). Some studies showed BMSC
transplantation could repair damaged ovary in rats that
were undergoing chemotherapy (11, 13).Despite numerous benefits of stem cell therapy, it
has its potential restrict (10). Moreover, BMSCs can
produce growth factors and cytokines for angiogenesis,
mitogenesis and anti-apoptosis factors such as ions,
immunological rejection may still occur and there is
the possibility of malignant transformation (14). An
alternative method is to use the secretome instead
of the stem cells themselves. This idea is based on
the concept that the secretome is responsible for a
considerable proportion of the therapeutic potential
of stem cells (15, 16).In this study, ovaries were damaged by CTX
treatment in rats. Then, BMSCs and conditioned
medium (CM) of the cells were directly injected into
the ovaries to compare the effect of transplantation
of BMSCs and their CM on function and structure of
damaged ovaries.
Materials and Methods
In this experimental study, 40 adult female Wistar rats
(180-200 g) were kept under controlled temperature (27
± 2°C) with free access to food and water. Vaginal smear
was prepared daily and only those displaying at least
two consecutive normal estrus cycles, were included in
the experiments. All animal protocols were approved by
the Research Council of Semnan University of Medical
Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Bone marrow stromal cells culture
BMSCs were prepared from an adult female
rat. After killing the rat, femurs and tibias were
dissected out. The bone marrow was ejected with 10
ml of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM,
Gibco, Germany), cultured in DMEM containing
10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Germany) and
1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, Germany), and
incubated at 37°C with 95% humidity and 5% CO2.
Two days later, the culture medium was replaced with
fresh medium to remove debris (17).
Analysis of the cell surface antigen markers
To analyze BMSCs surface antigen markers, flow
cytometry was performed. At least 1×105 cells were
incubated with fluorescence-labeled monoclonal
antibodies against CD29, CD34, CD44, CD45 and
CD90 (Sigma, USA). After 10 minutes of rinsing
with PBS, expression of the CD markers in BMSCs
were analyzed by flow cytometry (BD FACS
Calibur) (11).
Preparation of conditioned medium
BMSCs that reached more than 70% confluence,
were re-fed with serum-free DMEM. After culturing
1×106 BMSCs for 24 hours, the CM was collected and
concentrated 25-fold using ultrafiltration units with
a 5 kDa molecular weight cut-off (Amicon, Millipore,
USA). The concentrated medium was stored at -80°C for
future use (18, 19).
Creating the chemotherapy model
The POF model of chemotherapy was created according
to the method described by Takehara et al. (20) . For this
purpose, initially CTX (Sigma, china) diluted in normal
saline was intraperitoneally injected (50 mg/kg). Then,
CTX 8 mg/kg/day was injected for 13 consecutive days
(a total of 14 doses).
Procedure of transplantation
The rats were randomly divided into four groups as
follow (n=10 in each group): i. Normal group: received
no treatment, ii. Control group: after induction of POF,
20 µl of culture medium was directly injected into the
bilateral ovaries, iii. BMSCs group: after induction
of POF, 2×106 BMSCs suspended in 20 µl of culture
medium were directly injected into the bilateral
ovaries, and iv. CM group: after induction of POF, 20
µl of the CM was directly injected into the bilateral
ovaries (2).
Tracking of transplanted bone marrow stromal cells
in the ovaries
BMSCs were labeled with DiI (1,1`-dioctadecyl3,3,3`,
3`-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate,
Sigma, China) in the ovaries to show the presence and
viability of the transplanted cells after four weeks.
Briefly, after suspending the cells, 5 µl/ml DiI was
added into the culture medium and incubated for 20
minutes. Then, the cells were centrifuged, rinsed with
PBS, and suspended again for transplantation. Four
weeks after transplantation, prepared paraffin sections
and the labeled cells were detected by fluorescence
microscopy (Motic, AE31, Spain) (21, 22).
Hormonal examination
Four weeks after transplantation, levels of serum
estradiol (E2) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)
were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(ELISA) kits (East bio pharm, China) for rats, according
to the manufacturer’s instructions (11, 23-25).
Assess the ability of ovulation
Four weeks after transplantation, the rats were super
ovulated by an intraperitoneal injection of 150 IU/kg
of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG, Sigma,
china), followed by an intraperitoneal injection of 75
IU/kg of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG, Sigma,
china) administered 48 hours later (26). The oocytes were
obtained from the ampulla portion of the oviduct, 14-16
hours after hCG injection (2).
Apoptosis detection
Four weeks after transplantation, apoptotic granulosa
cells (GCs) were assessed by TUNEL assay kit
(Roche, Germany). Briefly, the sections were treated
with 20 g/ml proteinase K for 10 minutes and 0.1%
Triton X-100 in 0.1% sodium citrate for 2 minutes on
ice. The sections were placed in the TUNEL reaction
mixture and stained using diaminobenzidine (DAB)
solution for 10 minutes at room temperature. Then,
they were counter-stained using hematoxylin. At least
100 GCs were counted in eight random fields under
a fluorescence microscope (Motic, AE31, Spain) to
calculate the percentage of apoptotic cells (11, 27-29).
Ovarian follicle counts
Ovarian follicles were counted according to the
method described by Sun et al. (2). Briefly, four weeks
after transplantation, the ovaries were collected, fixed
in paraformaldehyde, dehydrated, paraffin-embedded
and serially sectioned with 5-µm thicknesses.
Five representative sections from each ovary were
randomly chosen and routine hematoxylin and eosin
(H&E) staining was performed. Finally, the number of
primordial, primary, secondary and antral follicles was
evaluated.
Statistical analyses
All data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) followed by the Tukey’s post-test. Obtained
data were presented as mean ± SD, and a P<0.05 was
considered statistically significant.
Results
Bone marrow stromal cells culture and characterization
In the early days of BMSCs culture, the cells were
spindle-shaped and formed colonies. After a few
days, the morphology of the BMSCs was similar
to that of fibroblast and after repeating passages,
the morphology of the cells became homogeneous
(Fig .1A, B). Most of the cells were immunopositive for
markers of mesenchymal stromal stem cells namely,
CD29, CD44 and CD90, and were immunonegative
for hematopoietic markers namely, CD34 and CD45
(Fig .1C).
Fig.1
The isolation and identification of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). Cultured BMSCs at A. Passages 1, B. 3 (×100), and C. Flow cytometry results
showing BMSCs positive for CD29, CD44 and CD90, and negative for CD34 and CD45.
The isolation and identification of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). Cultured BMSCs at A. Passages 1, B. 3 (×100), and C. Flow cytometry results
showing BMSCs positive for CD29, CD44 and CD90, and negative for CD34 and CD45.
Identification of bone marrow stromal cells in the
ovaries
Histochemistry technique showed that the transplanted
BMSCs that were labeled with DiI appeared as red spots in
the sections of ovaries. The results confirmed the presence
and viability of the transplanted cells in the ovaries, four
weeks after transplantation (Fig .2).
Fig.2
Bone marrow stromal cells labeled with DiI (appeared as red spots) in an ovary section, four weeks after transplantation (×100).
Levels of estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone
The levels of serum E2 in the BMSCs and CM groups were
significantly higher than those of the control group; however,
the levels of serum FSH in the BMSCs and CM groups
were significantly lower than those of the control group. No
statistically significant differences were observed between
the BMSCs and CM groups (P<0.05, Fig .3).
Fig.3
Levels of ovarian hormones after bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) transplantation. Four weeks after transplantation, A. Serum levels of estradiol
(E2) in BMSCs and conditioned medium (CM) groups were significantly higher than control group and B. While serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone
(FSH) in BMSCs and CM groups were significantly lower than control group. *; P<0.05 vs. control group.
The ability of ovulation
The results of the ability of ovulation showed that the
number of oocytes in the BMSCs and CM groups was
significantly greater than the control group, but there
was no statistically significant differences between the
BMSCs and CM groups (P<0.05, Fig .4).
Fig.4
The number of oocytes after bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) transplantation. Collected oocytes after super ovulation in A. Normal, B. Control, C.
BMSCs, D. Conditioned medium (CM) groups (×40), and E. The number of oocytes after super ovulation in all groups. *; P<0.05 vs. control group.
Apoptosis of granulosa cells
The percentage of TUNEL-positive GCs in the ovaries
of the BMSCs and CM groups was significantly lower than
that of the control group, but no statistically significant
differences were observed between the BMSCs and CM
groups (P<0.05, Fig .5).
Fig.5
The apoptosis of ovaries after bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) transplantation. Apoptotic granulosa cells (GCs) are marked in brown using TUNEL staining in
A. Normal, B. Control, C. BMSCs, D. Conditioned medium (CM) groups (×200), and E. The number of TUNEL-positive GCs in all groups. *; P<0.05 vs. control group.
Ovarian follicle counts
In the BMSCs and CM groups, H&E staining indicated
that the number of follicles at different stages was
significantly higher than that of the control group. There
was no statistically significant differences in the number
of follicles between the BMSCs and CM groups (P<0.05,
Fig .6).
Fig.6
The number of ovarian follicles after bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) transplantation. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of ovaries in A.
Normal, B. Control, C. BMSCs, D. Conditioned medium (CM) groups (×40), and E. The number of follicles at different stages in all groups. *; P<0.05 versus
control group.
Bone marrow stromal cells labeled with DiI (appeared as red spots) in an ovary section, four weeks after transplantation (×100).Levels of ovarian hormones after bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) transplantation. Four weeks after transplantation, A. Serum levels of estradiol
(E2) in BMSCs and conditioned medium (CM) groups were significantly higher than control group and B. While serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone
(FSH) in BMSCs and CM groups were significantly lower than control group. *; P<0.05 vs. control group.The number of oocytes after bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) transplantation. Collected oocytes after super ovulation in A. Normal, B. Control, C.
BMSCs, D. Conditioned medium (CM) groups (×40), and E. The number of oocytes after super ovulation in all groups. *; P<0.05 vs. control group.The apoptosis of ovaries after bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) transplantation. Apoptotic granulosa cells (GCs) are marked in brown using TUNEL staining in
A. Normal, B. Control, C. BMSCs, D. Conditioned medium (CM) groups (×200), and E. The number of TUNEL-positive GCs in all groups. *; P<0.05 vs. control group.The number of ovarian follicles after bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) transplantation. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of ovaries in A.
Normal, B. Control, C. BMSCs, D. Conditioned medium (CM) groups (×40), and E. The number of follicles at different stages in all groups. *; P<0.05 versus
control group.
Discussion
Following chemotherapy, the ovaries may be this study, for the first time, we compared the effect
damaged as reflected by follicle loss, cortical fibrosis, of BMSCs transplantation and that of secretome
and vascular damage (30, 31). Some articles have transplantation by evaluating the improvements of
shown that BMSCs transplantation after chemotherapy ovarian function and structure in a chemotherapy
induced POF rat model. Overall, the results of
secretome transplantation were almost similar to those
of BMSCs transplantation and there was no significant
differences between them.It has been suggested that the paracrine activity of
growth factors and cytokines released by transplanted
stem cells may account for their therapeutic potential
(14, 15). Some articles have reported that beneficial
effect of stem cells on degenerative diseases, is due
to their ability to secrete trophic factors that have
beneficial impact on damaged tissue, rather than their
ability to differentiate into the needed cells (32, 33).
Different studies on the factors secreted by stem cells
have shown that these factors, in the absence of stem
cells, may regenerate tissues under several conditions
(34, 35). Secreted factors are referred to as secretome
that are released in the medium where the stem cells
are cultured, so, the medium is called CM (35).We cultured BMSCs and obtained the CM. Next,
BMSCs and the CM were individually transplanted
into ratovaries after chemotherapy. BMSCs
expressed CD29, CD44 and CD90, but not CD34
and CD45, which was in agreement with other
reports (11, 17). Since DiI labeling is a simple and
stable technique which persists for a long time to
trace cells in in vivo experiments (36), we labeled
BMSCs with DiI and transplanted them into the
ovaries. Moreover, it was shown that the transplanted
BMSCs could survive in the ovaries after four
weeks. This result was in agreement with those of
other studies (21, 22). The results of histological,
hormonal and functional assessments including
counting the number of follicles, apoptotic cells and
oocytes, and measuring serum levels of E2 and FSH,
showed that transplantation of BMSCs and their CM
were significantly more effective in repairing the
ovaries as compared to control group. The results of
BMSCs transplantation group were consistent with
other reports (11, 13) which showed that BMSCs
transplantation into damaged ovaries could repair
them. However, the effect of transplantation of
BMSCs-secretome on damaged ovaries following
chemotherapy, has not been previously investigated.BMSCs are emerging as strong candidates for cell
therapy in the ovaries because they produce growth
factors such as VEGF, IGF-1, HGF and bFGF that
can prevent cell apoptosis and promote functional
recovery (11-13, 37). VEGF is an angiogenic cytokine
that promotes formation of new capillary networks
providing nutrition for GCs (11, 13, 37). IGF-1 is
a growth hormone that stimulates GC proliferation
by regulating DNA replication of theca cells and
GCs. IGF-1 enhances the function of gonadotropin
hormones, regulates aromatase activity, promotes
follicular antrum formation and inhibits apoptosis
(11, 13). HGF is a cytokine that promotes follicle
maturation and suppresses apoptosis in ovarian
follicles and GCs (11). Another growth factor is
bFGF which acts as an initiator of folliculogenesis by
inducing primordial follicle development (37). Some
articles have reported that these cytokines and growth
factors are secreted by the stem cells into their CM
(34, 38). Despite the benefits of stem cells, the use
of secretome-containing CM has many advantages
over the use of stem cells, as CM can be packaged,
manufactured, freeze-dried and transported more
easily, and there is no need for donor-recipient
matching to avoid rejection problems (34). Moreover,
the most serious concern about stem cells is the
possibility of malignant transformation (39). In
relation to this topic, Lee et al. (35) have shown that
repairing liver tissue with CM transplantation of
adipose-derived stem cells is comparable to adipose-
derived stem cell transplantation.Since the results of transplantation of BMSCs
and their CM were almost similar, cell-free therapy
using secretome can probably be a suitable way to
overcome the limitations of stem cell-based therapy.
Since paracrine factors produced by stem cells can
accumulate in the CM, it can be used as a cell free-
therapy. Mesenchymal stem cell secretome contains
a large number of cytokines and growth factors that
are critical for repairing damaged tissues (34, 35).
More research is necessary to clarify the molecular
mechanisms through which stem cell-CM repairs the
ovaries.
Conclusion
BMSCs and BMSCs-secretome produced almost
similar results in terms of ovarian regeneration in a
chemotherapy-induced POF model in rats. These
results show BMSCs-secretome is likely responsible
for the therapeutic paracrine effect of BMSCs. Stem
cell-secretome is expected to overcome the limitations
of stem cell transplantation and become the basis of a
novel therapy for ovarian damage.
Authors: Jan C Brune; Ariane Tormin; Maria C Johansson; Pehr Rissler; Otte Brosjö; Richard Löfvenberg; Fredrik Vult von Steyern; Fredrik Mertens; Anders Rydholm; Stefan Scheding Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2010-12-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Luciana Lamarão Damous; Ana Elisa Teófilo Saturi de Carvalho; Juliana Sanajotti Nakamuta; Marcos Eiji Shiroma; Andressa Cristina Sposato Louzada; José Maria Soares-Jr; José Eduardo Krieger; Edmund C Baracat Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 6.832