Literature DB >> 29308603

A warning for Chinese academic evaluation systems: short-term bibliometric measures misjudge the value of pioneering contributions.

Xiao-Jun Hu1, Jian-Hong Luo1, Ronald Rousseau2,3.   

Abstract

Publication citation-based research evaluation, even if only in support of peer review, is not everywhere, on every level, or for everyone suitable, because of differences in scientific research, patterns of research output, stages of scientific evolution, and merits-scientific or societal-of scientific results.

Keywords:  Academic evaluation; Pioneering work; Nobel Prize; Bibliometric indicator; Short-term evaluation

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29308603      PMCID： PMC5802976          DOI： 10.1631/jzus.B1700569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B        ISSN： 1673-1581            Impact factor:   3.066


  6 in total

1.  The development of new antimalarial drugs: qinghaosu and dihydro-qinghaosu.

Authors:  Y Tu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Metrics: A profusion of measures.

Authors:  Richard Van Noorden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The measure of research merit.

Authors:  Marcia McNutt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Measuring merit: take the risk.

Authors:  Kumar Selvarajoo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Structural and functional analyses of APG5, a gene involved in autophagy in yeast.

Authors:  S Kametaka; A Matsuura; Y Wada; Y Ohsumi
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1996-10-31       Impact factor: 3.688

6.  Specific cleavage of simian virus 40 DNA by restriction endonuclease of Hemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  K Danna; D Nathans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 11.205
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.