Literature DB >> 29308389

Uses of Bibliometric Techniques in Public Health Research.

Luana Kelle Batista Moura1, Rafael Fernandes de Mesquita2,3, Mitra Mobin1, Francisca Tereza Coelho Matos1, Thiago Lima Monte1, Eliana Campelo Lago1, Carlos Alberto Monteiro Falcão1, Maria Ângela de Arêa Leão Ferraz1, Tanit Clementino Santos1, Laelson Rochelle Milanês Sousa4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29308389      PMCID: PMC5750357     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Public Health        ISSN: 2251-6085            Impact factor:   1.429


× No keyword cloud information.

Dear Editor-in-Chief

Bibliometric research uses statistical and mathematical methods to analyze and build indicators on the dynamics and evolution of scientific and technological information on a given topic. The relevance of its applicability as a data collection and analysis technique has been corroborated as one of the argumentative sources in the research for investment resources in academic rankings (1–2). To carry out a bibliometric study, it is important to consider the selection of the database to be used; maintaining compatibility of this choice with the research aims and reach the results (3). In this way, the ISI, Web of Knowledge, Web of Science database is recommended for its academic recognition of being considered one of the most comprehensive databases of journals covering several areas of scientific knowledge (4), besides being important and pioneering in bringing together journals of more than one hundred areas of knowledge. Data collection from the ISI Web of Knowledge/Web of ScienceTM database can be done by exporting this data to the HistCiteTM bibliometric analysis software package to organize information and facilitate analysis. The data can be analyzed considering: the annual evolution trajectory of the publications; the journals with the greatest number of records; the authors with more publications; the number of papers distributed by author’s country of origin; the most cited articles in the Web of Science (global) and those most cited in the set of selected articles (local). Thus, investigations of academic and practical problems of public health research can be developed in a methodological approach that maps the scientific production of several fields and provides researchers with sources with recognized value through citation and authoring metrics: bibliometric techniques (5, 6). Although bibliometric rely on techniques that go beyond citation analysis, bibliometric are currently based on the understanding of the production of knowledge in a scientific field or on specific themes and the activity of its producers (7). The understanding of knowledge production and its measurement are supported and accompanied by the evolution of digital communication technologies and this allows a greater reach of information (8). The suggestion that we address in this letter is the proposal of answers to the research problems related to the most varied subjects of public health through research in international databases that seek to map the international scientific production. This map ensures the understanding of the knowledge produced in a given field and allows monitoring its development, implying improvements in the development of public health policies.
  1 in total

1.  How to use bibliometric methods in evaluation of scientific research? An example from Finnish schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Johanna Koskinen; Matti Isohanni; Henna Paajala; Erika Jääskeläinen; Pentti Nieminen; Hannu Koponen; Pekka Tienari; Jouko Miettunen
Journal:  Nord J Psychiatry       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.202

  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  Twitter Research Synthesis for Health Promotion: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Syed Hamad Hassan Shah; Saleha Noor; Atif Saleem Butt; Habiba Halepoto
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.429

2.  Microscopy in Endodontics: A Bibliometric Survey.

Authors:  Lisandra Silva Brito; Magna Cinthya Venâncio Santos; Wanderson Carvalho De Almeida; Lucas Fernandes Falcão; Daniel Fernandes Falcão; Giselle Torres Feitosa; Raony Môlim De Sousa Pereira; Maria Ângela Arêa Leão Ferraz; Carlos Alberto Monteiro Falcão
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.479

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.