Literature DB >> 29308343

Urban Emissions of Water Vapor in Winter.

Olivia E Salmon1, Paul B Shepson1,2, Xinrong Ren3,4, Allison B Marquardt Collow5,6, Mark A Miller7, Annmarie G Carlton8, Maria O L Cambaliza1,9, Alexie Heimburger1, Kristan L Morgan2, Jose D Fuentes10, Brian H Stirm11, Robert Grundman11, Russell R Dickerson4.   

Abstract

Elevated water vapor (H2Ov) mole fractions were occassionally observed downwind of Indianapolis, IN, and the Washington, D.C.-Baltimore, MD, area during airborne mass balance experiments conducted during winter months between 2012 and 2015. On days when an urban H2Ov excess signal was observed, H2Ov emissions estimates range between 1.6 × 104 and 1.7 × 105 kg s-1, and account for up to 8.4% of the total (background + urban excess) advected flow of atmospheric boundary layer H2Ov from the urban study sites. Estimates of H2Ov emissions from combustion sources and electricity generation facility cooling towers are 1-2 orders of magnitude smaller than the urban H2Ov emission rates estimated from observations. Instances of urban H2Ov enhancement could be a result of differences in snowmelt and evaporation rates within the urban area, due in part to larger wintertime anthropogenic heat flux and land cover differences, relative to surrounding rural areas. More study is needed to understand why the urban H2Ov excess signal is observed on some days, and not others. Radiative transfer modeling indicates that the observed urban enhancements in H2Ov and other greenhouse gas mole fractions contribute only 0.1°C day-1 to the urban heat island at the surface. This integrated warming through the boundary layer is offset by longwave cooling by H2Ov at the top of the boundary layer. While the radiative impacts of urban H2Ov emissions do not meaningfully influence urban heat island intensity, urban H2Ov emissions may have the potential to alter downwind aerosol and cloud properties.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29308343      PMCID: PMC5749933          DOI: 10.1002/2016JD026074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos        ISSN: 2169-897X            Impact factor:   4.261


  15 in total

1.  Contributions of stratospheric water vapor to decadal changes in the rate of global warming.

Authors:  Susan Solomon; Karen H Rosenlof; Robert W Portmann; John S Daniel; Sean M Davis; Todd J Sanford; Gian-Kasper Plattner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Climate. How do aerosols affect cloudiness and climate?

Authors:  François-Marie Bréon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Flood or drought: how do aerosols affect precipitation?

Authors:  Daniel Rosenfeld; Ulrike Lohmann; Graciela B Raga; Colin D O'Dowd; Markku Kulmala; Sandro Fuzzi; Anni Reissell; Meinrat O Andreae
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Decreasing Aerosol Water Is Consistent with OC Trends in the Southeast U.S.

Authors:  Thien Khoi V Nguyen; Shannon L Capps; Annmarie G Carlton
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Spatially resolved flux measurements of NOx from London suggest significantly higher emissions than predicted by inventories.

Authors:  Adam R Vaughan; James D Lee; Pawel K Misztal; Stefan Metzger; Marvin D Shaw; Alastair C Lewis; Ruth M Purvis; David C Carslaw; Allen H Goldstein; C Nicholas Hewitt; Brian Davison; Sean D Beevers; Thomas G Karl
Journal:  Faraday Discuss       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.008

6.  Aircraft-Based Estimate of Total Methane Emissions from the Barnett Shale Region.

Authors:  Anna Karion; Colm Sweeney; Eric A Kort; Paul B Shepson; Alan Brewer; Maria Cambaliza; Stephen A Conley; Ken Davis; Aijun Deng; Mike Hardesty; Scott C Herndon; Thomas Lauvaux; Tegan Lavoie; David Lyon; Tim Newberger; Gabrielle Pétron; Chris Rella; Mackenzie Smith; Sonja Wolter; Tara I Yacovitch; Pieter Tans
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Daytime CO2 urban surface fluxes from airborne measurements, eddy-covariance observations and emissions inventory in Greater London.

Authors:  A Font; C S B Grimmond; S Kotthaus; J-A Morguí; C Stockdale; E O'Connor; M Priestman; B Barratt
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Aircraft-based measurements of the carbon footprint of Indianapolis.

Authors:  Kelly L Mays; Paul B Shepson; Brian H Stirm; Anna Karion; Colm Sweeney; Kevin R Gurney
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Attribution of observed surface humidity changes to human influence.

Authors:  Katharine M Willett; Nathan P Gillett; Philip D Jones; Peter W Thorne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Aerosol liquid water driven by anthropogenic nitrate: implications for lifetimes of water-soluble organic gases and potential for secondary organic aerosol formation.

Authors:  Natasha Hodas; Amy P Sullivan; Kate Skog; Frank N Keutsch; Jeffrey L Collett; Stefano Decesari; M Cristina Facchini; Annmarie G Carlton; Ari Laaksonen; Barbara J Turpin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  4 in total

1.  Water emissions put a damper on the coal-to-gas transition.

Authors:  Gabriel J Bowen; Richard P Fiorella
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Coupled Air Quality and Boundary-Layer Meteorology in Western U.S. Basins during Winter: Design and Rationale for a Comprehensive Study.

Authors:  A Gannet Hallar; Steven S Brown; Erik Crosman; Kelley Barsanti; Christopher D Cappa; Ian Faloona; Jerome Fast; Heather A Holmes; John Horel; John Lin; Ann Middlebrook; Logan Mitchell; Jennifer Murphy; Caroline C Womack; Viney Aneja; Munkhbayar Baasandorj; Roya Bahreini; Robert Banta; Casey Bray; Alan Brewer; Dana Caulton; Joost de Gouw; Stephan F J De Wekker; Delphine K Farmer; Cassandra J Gaston; Sebastian Hoch; Francesca Hopkins; Nakul N Karle; James T Kelly; Kerry Kelly; Neil Lareau; Keding Lu; Roy L Mauldin; Derek V Mallia; Randal Martin; Daniel Mendoza; Holly J Oldroyd; Yelena Pichugina; Kerri A Pratt; Pablo Saide; Phillip J Silva; William Simpson; Britton B Stephens; Jochen Stutz; Amy Sullivan
Journal:  Bull Am Meteorol Soc       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 9.116

3.  Fluxes of Atmospheric Greenhouse-Gases in Maryland (FLAGG-MD): Emissions of Carbon Dioxide in the Baltimore, MD-Washington, D.C. area.

Authors:  D Y Ahn; J R Hansford; S T Howe; X R Ren; R J Salawitch; N Zeng; M D Cohen; B Stunder; O E Salmon; P B Shepson; K R Gurney; T Oda; I Lopez-Coto; J Whetstone; R R Dickerson
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.261

4.  Vapor isotopic evidence for the worsening of winter air quality by anthropogenic combustion-derived water.

Authors:  Meng Xing; Weiguo Liu; Xia Li; Weijian Zhou; Qiyuan Wang; Jie Tian; Xiaofei Li; Xuexi Tie; Guohui Li; Junji Cao; Huiming Bao; Zhisheng An
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.