| Literature DB >> 29308017 |
Srilakshmi M Adhyapak1, Prahlad G Menon2,3,4,5, Kiron Varghese1, Abhinav Mehra5, S B Lohitashwa1, Fabio Fantini6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Late revascularization following a myocardial infarction has questionable clinical benefit.Entities:
Keywords: Myocardial infarction; infarct-related artery patency; percutaneous coronary intervention; revascularization
Year: 2017 PMID: 29308017 PMCID: PMC5751905 DOI: 10.1177/1179546817746636
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Med Insights Cardiol ISSN: 1179-5468
Patient clinical characteristics at baseline.
| Patient characteristics (N = 13) | |
|---|---|
| Age, y | 53.3 ± 15.7 |
| Females | 3 |
| Killip class | 1.3 ± 0.9 |
| Hypertension | 8 |
| Diabetes | 7 |
| Smoking | 6 |
| Family history of CAD | 2 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 22 vs 5 |
| Time between primary event and PCI, d | 0 ± 2.5 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CAD: coronary artery disease; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention.
Comparison of 2-dimensional echocardiographic parameters at baseline and after PCI.
| Pre-PCI | Post-PCI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| LV EDV | 100 ± 13 mL | 96 ± 9 mL | .43 |
| LV ESV | 55 ± 9 mL | 42 ± 8 mL | .034 |
| LVEF | 41% ± 9% | 52% ± 7% | .04 |
| LVDD | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.7 | .34 |
Abbreviations: LV EDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LV ESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; LVDD, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 1.Automated LV segmentation from 4 chamber long axis echocardiographic images. (A) at each frame of a time series imaging sequence, followed by regional analysis of cumulative displacement from the end-diastolic phase (E). Representative segmentation results in the end-dyastolic phase (D) are the regional curvature outlines of Poisson surface reconstructions of an artificially extruded (ie normal to the image) 3D version of a thresholded active contour level set function (B) which was used to crop/isolate the original image frame and detect the LV region.
Figure 2.Average cumulative wall displacement (CWD) of the LV endocardium at baseline (blue) and after (red) percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) following anterior-wall myocardial infarction.The error bars indicate standard deviation in the LV averaged CWD across the study cohort, before (blue) and after (red) PCI.
Figure 3.Regional average CWD in the septal, lateral and apical segments of the LV endocardiumpresented superimposed with theglobalLV averaged CWD at baseline (blue) following an anterior wall myocardial infarction and after (red) PCI.
Figure 4.Comparison of regional LV-averaged CWD at baseline and after PCI for a patient-specific case where improvements in LV function were seen after PCI.
Comparison of regional LV CWD before and after PCI for a patient-specific case where improvements in LV function were seen after PCI.
| Phase | Pre-PCI | Post-PCI | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lateral, % | Septal, % | Apical, % | Most contractile wall region | Lateral, % | Septal, % | Apical, % | Most contractile wall region | |
| 1 | 81.48 | 6.14 | 12.39 | Lateral | 8.86 | 43.12 | 54.18 | Apical |
| 2 | 75.32 | 11.51 | 13.16 | Lateral | 33.52 | 78.80 | 89.80 | Apical |
| 3 | 74.33 | 5.37 | 20.30 | Lateral | 67.53 | 24.50 | 41.56 | Lateral |
| 4 | 54.13 | 9.46 | 36.41 | Lateral | 93.33 | 8.94 | 6.82 | Lateral |
| 5 | 61.37 | 4.82 | 33.81 | Lateral | 62.95 | 39.49 | 27.02 | Lateral |
| 6 | 69.95 | 10.02 | 20.03 | Lateral | 49.33 | 26.58 | 44.51 | Lateral |
| 7 | 78.54 | 15.59 | 5.87 | Lateral | 48.93 | 30.31 | 40.95 | Lateral |
| 8 | 80.49 | 11.75 | 7.77 | Lateral | 45.84 | 32.69 | 40.43 | Lateral |
| 9 | 79.15 | 4.05 | 16.81 | Lateral | 48.91 | 35.23 | 36.10 | Lateral |
| 10 | 54.98 | 1.70 | 43.32 | Lateral | 47.42 | 38.14 | 34.81 | Lateral |
| 11 | 34.81 | 6.11 | 59.08 | Apical | 49.92 | 41.63 | 28.89 | Lateral |
| 12 | 36.81 | 3.76 | 59.43 | Apical | 38.29 | 42.60 | 36.67 | Septal |
| 13 | 39.71 | 12.84 | 47.45 | Apical | 40.80 | 38.36 | 40.63 | Lateral |
| 14 | 29.71 | 16.62 | 53.67 | Apical | 41.90 | 40.45 | 37.93 | Lateral |
| 15 | 13.01 | 29.94 | 57.05 | Lateral | 39.26 | 39.56 | 39.81 | Apical |
| 16 | 38.80 | 46.26 | 14.95 | Septal | 39.32 | 37.76 | 42.23 | Apical |
| 17 | 26.99 | 28.87 | 44.14 | Apical | 29.07 | 37.93 | 49.94 | Apical |
| 18 | 19.46 | 23.59 | 56.94 | Apical | 33.72 | 37.66 | 47.38 | Apical |
| 19 | 23.66 | 25.69 | 50.65 | Apical | 36.17 | 34.49 | 46.62 | Apical |
| 20 | 30.52 | 31.75 | 37.73 | Apical | 27.41 | 39.15 | 48.42 | Apical |
| 21 | 64.66 | 27.02 | 8.32 | Lateral | 38.21 | 28.82 | 50.62 | Apical |
| 22 | 56.52 | 19.15 | 24.32 | Lateral | 37.22 | 38.05 | 43.44 | Apical |
| 23 | 53.37 | 14.34 | 32.29 | Lateral | 32.57 | 29.89 | 52.88 | Apical |
| 24 | 27.52 | 43.78 | 28.70 | Septal | 28.15 | 38.21 | 48.33 | Apical |
| 25 | 19.42 | 60.81 | 19.76 | Septal | 43.16 | 15.96 | 52.38 | Apical |
| 26 | 35.13 | 54.95 | 9.92 | Septal | 5.90 | 38.61 | 62.03 | Apical |
| 27 | 34.90 | 50.45 | 14.65 | Septal | 24.83 | 30.42 | 58.46 | Apical |
| 28 | 22.32 | 69.33 | 8.35 | Septal | 22.13 | 37.91 | 53.15 | Apical |
| 29 | 39.50 | 45.55 | 14.96 | Septal | 28.69 | 52.49 | 34.55 | Septal |
Abbreviations: CWD, cumulative wall displacement; LV, left ventricular; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 5.Comparison of the maximal contractile LV region at baseline and after PCI for a patient-specific case where improvements in LV function were seen after PCI.