| Literature DB >> 29307995 |
Kosuke Kaji1, Hiroaki Takaya2, Soichiro Saikawa2, Masanori Furukawa2, Shinya Sato2, Hideto Kawaratani2, Mitsuteru Kitade2, Kei Moriya2, Tadashi Namisaki2, Takemi Akahane2, Akira Mitoro2, Hitoshi Yoshiji2.
Abstract
AIM: To determine the efficacy of rifaximin for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) with the linkage of gut microbiome in decompensated cirrhotic patients.Entities:
Keywords: Endotoxin; Gut microbiome; Hepatic encephalopathy; Liver cirrhosis; Rifaximin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29307995 PMCID: PMC5743506 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i47.8355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastroenterol ISSN: 1007-9327 Impact factor: 5.742
Figure 1The selection of the study population and experimental design. 20 patients except for 25 patients to meet the exclusion criteria and decline to participate were finally analyzed.
Characteristic features of patients at baseline (n = 20)
| Age | 66.8 (46-81) | ||
| Sex (male/female) | 12/8 | ||
| Etiology | |||
| Alcohol | 4 | ||
| HBV | 4 | ||
| HCV | 8 | ||
| NASH | 2 | ||
| Alcohol + HBV | 1 | ||
| Alcohol + HCV | 1 | ||
| Child class (A/B/C) | 0/18/2 | ||
| MELD score | 8.3 (2.6-15.0) | 7.5 (1.2-15.0) | 0.474 |
| AST (U/L) | 50 ± 22 | 53 ± 29 | 0.791 |
| ALT (U/L) | 32 ± 14 | 31 ± 14 | 0.755 |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 3.3 ± 0.6 | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 0.980 |
| Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | 1.8 ± 0.9 | 1.6 ± 0.8 | 0.545 |
| Prothrombin time (INR) | 1.28 ± 0.11 | 1.26 ± 0.11 | 0.630 |
| CRP (mg/dL) | 0.3 ± 0.6 | 0.2 ± 0.2 | 0.533 |
| WBC (103/μL) | 3.4 ± 1.1 | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 0.847 |
| Platelet (104/μL) | 8.1 ± 4.1 | 7.7 ± 3.5 | 0.710 |
| BTR | 3.7 ± 1.5 | 4.2 ± 3.7 | 0.601 |
Data of age and MELD score are given in median and total range. The other data are given in mean ± SD. BTR: Branched chain amino acid and tyrosine ratio; CRP: C-reactive protein; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; HCV: Hepatitis C virus; NASH: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.
Figure 2Effect of rifaximin on serum ammonia level. Comparison of the mean levels of serum ammonia between baseline and 4 wk post-rifaximin among (A) total patients (n = 20) and (B) the patients who showed high levels of serum ammonia (> 70 μg/dL) at baseline (n = 16). Data are means ± SD.
Figure 3Effect of rifaximin on cognitive disturbance. Comparison of the mean time required for NCT between baseline and 4 wk post-rifaximin among (A) total patients (n =20) and (B) the patients who showed prolongation for NCT (> 50 s) at baseline (n = 10). Data are means ± SD.
Figure 4Effect of rifaximin on endotoxin activity. Comparison of the endotoxin activities between baseline and 4 wk post-rifaximin among (A) total patients (n = 20) and (B) the patients who showed high levels of EA (> 0.4) at baseline (n = 11). C: Univariate correlation analysis between the decrease in EA level (Δ EA) and that in serum ammonia level (Δ NH3) by treatment with rifaximin (r = 0.5886, P < 0.05). Data are means ± SD.
Figure 5Effect of rifaximin on the diversity and major compositions of gut microbiome. A: Shannon diversity between baseline and treatment groups (mean index ± SD 3.948 ± 0.548 at baseline vs 3.980 ± 0.968 at treatment, P = 0.544). B: Pco analysis (PcoA) of gut microbiota. Baseline samples (blue) were clustered together compared to 4 wk post-rifaximin (red). C-E: Effects of rifaximin on alterations in the composition of gut microbiome in phylum (C), class (D) and order (E).
Figure 6Alterations in abundances of selected genera by treatment with rifaximin. Relative abundances of (A) Veillonella, (B) Streptococcus, (C) Lactobacillus, (D) Prevotella, (E) Haemophilus, (F) Megaspaera and (G) Fusobacterium. Data are means ± SD.