Literature DB >> 29307675

Establishing minimally important differences for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Joel J Gagnier1, Chris Robbins2, Asheesh Bedi2, James E Carpenter2, Bruce S Miller2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) are frequently used measures in clinical research for patients with rotator cuff tears (RCTs). The minimally important differences (MIDs) for these measures have not been established in patients with RCTs. The purpose of this study was to establish the MIDs for patients with known RCTs treated both surgically or nonsurgically.
METHODS: We included 222 subjects with full-thickness RCTs. The WORC and ASES were collected at baseline and at 4, 8, 16, 32, 48, and 64 weeks, as was an end of study form with questions about change in the condition after treatment. We calculated anchor-based and distribution-based MIDs. We used regression modeling to determine change in MIDs as predicted by several variables.
RESULTS: For the anchor-based method, we found an MID of 21.9 for the ASES and -282.6 for the WORC. When using the distribution-based method of ½ and ⅓ the standard deviation, we arrived at an MID of 26.9 and 17.9 points for the ASES and -588.7 and -392.5 points for the WORC. No variables predicted MID changes.
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to report MIDs for the ASES and WORC in a population of patients with only full-thickness RCTs. This information will directly improve our ability to determine when patients with RCTs are changing in a meaningful manner and accurately power clinical studies using these outcome measures.
Copyright © 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score; Minimally important difference; Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC); minimal clinically important difference; patient-reported outcomess; rotator cuff tears

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29307675     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  17 in total

1.  Management of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes, reoperation rates, and treatment response.

Authors:  David Kovacevic; Robert J Suriani; Brian M Grawe; Edward H Yian; Mohit N Gilotra; S Ashfaq Hasan; Umasuthan Srikumaran; Samer S Hasan; Frances Cuomo; Robert T Burks; Andrew G Green; Wesley M Nottage; Sai Theja; Hafiz F Kassam; Maarouf A Saad; Miguel A Ramirez; Rodney J Stanley; Matthew D Williams; Vidushan Nadarajah; Alexis C Konja; Jason L Koh; Andrew S Rokito; Charles M Jobin; William N Levine; Christopher C Schmidt
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Which Is the Best Outcome Measure for Rotator Cuff Tears?

Authors:  Dominique I Dabija; Jacquelyn S Pennings; Kristin R Archer; Gregory D Ayers; Laurence D Higgins; John E Kuhn; Keith M Baumgarten; Elizabeth Matzkin; Nitin B Jain
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Shoulder Outcome Measures and Diagnoses: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dominique I Dabija; Nitin B Jain
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.159

4.  Radiographic Severity May Not be Associated with Pain and Function in Glenohumeral Arthritis.

Authors:  Christopher D Joyce; Michael J Gutman; Brian W Hill; Arjun M Singh; Matthew Sherman; Joseph A Abboud; Surena Namdari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Improvement of Pain and Function in Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With Bias Assessment.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; Ian A Jones; Ryan Togashi; Caron Park; C Thomas Vangsness
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Surgery for rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Teemu V Karjalainen; Nitin B Jain; Juuso Heikkinen; Renea V Johnston; Cristina M Page; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-09

7.  Validation of a Mobile Version of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form: An Observational Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Jingyi Hou; Qingyue Li; Menglei Yu; Fangqi Li; Yiyong Tang; Yi Long; Yamuhanmode Alike; Yuanhao Zhang; Maslah Idiris Ali; Congda Zhang; Weiping Li; Rui Yang
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  Establishing Minimal Important Differences for the VR-12 and SANE Scores in Patients Following Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Lingjie Zhou; Madhuri Natarajan; Bruce S Miller; Joel J Gagnier
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-07-26

9.  The results of using a tendon autograft as a new rotator cable for patients with a massive rotator cuff tear: a technical note and comparative outcome analysis.

Authors:  Egbert J D Veen; Ronald L Diercks; Ellie B M Landman; Cornelis T Koorevaar
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Effect of platelet-rich plasma on the degenerative rotator cuff tendinopathy according to the compositions.

Authors:  Sang Jun Kim; Seung Mi Yeo; Soo Jin Noh; Chul-Won Ha; Byung Chan Lee; Hyo Sun Lee; Sun Jeong Kim
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.