Erik H Middlebrooks1, Vanessa M Holanda2,3, Ibrahim S Tuna4, Hrishikesh D Deshpande5, Markus Bredel6, Leonardo Almeida7, Harrison C Walker8, Barton L Guthrie9, Kelly D Foote2, Michael S Okun7. 1. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd., Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA. Middlebrooks.Erik@mayo.edu. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 3. Center of Neurology and Neurosurgery Associates (CENNA), Beneficência Portuguesa of São Paulo Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil. 4. Department of Radiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 5. Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 7. Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 8. Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 9. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Deep brain stimulation is a common treatment for medication-refractory essential tremor. Current coordinate-based targeting methods result in variable outcomes due to variation in thalamic structure and the optimal patient-specific functional location. The purpose of this study was to compare the coordinate-based pre-operative targets to patient-specific thalamic segmentation utilizing a probabilistic tractography methodology. METHODS: Using available diffusion MRI of 32 subjects from the Human Connectome Project database, probabilistic tractography was performed. Each thalamic voxel was coded based on one of six predefined cortical targets. The segmentation results were analyzed and compared to a 2-mm spherical target centered at the coordinate-based location of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus. RESULTS: The traditional coordinate-based target had maximal overlap with the junction of the region most connected to primary motor cortex (M1) (36.6 ± 25.7% of voxels on left; 58.1 ± 28.5% on right) and the area connected to the supplementary motor area/premotor cortex (SMA/PMC) (44.9 ± 21.7% of voxels on left; 28.9 ± 22.2% on right). There was a within-subject coefficient of variation from right-to-left of 69.4 and 63.1% in the volume of overlap with the SMA/PMC and M1 regions, respectively. CONCLUSION: Thalamic segmentation based on structural connectivity measures is a promising technique that may enhance traditional targeting methods by generating reproducible, patient-specific pre-operative functional targets. Our results highlight the problematic intra- and inter-subject variability of indirect, coordinate-based targets. Future prospective clinical studies will be needed to validate this targeting methodology in essential tremor patients.
PURPOSE: Deep brain stimulation is a common treatment for medication-refractory essential tremor. Current coordinate-based targeting methods result in variable outcomes due to variation in thalamic structure and the optimal patient-specific functional location. The purpose of this study was to compare the coordinate-based pre-operative targets to patient-specific thalamic segmentation utilizing a probabilistic tractography methodology. METHODS: Using available diffusion MRI of 32 subjects from the Human Connectome Project database, probabilistic tractography was performed. Each thalamic voxel was coded based on one of six predefined cortical targets. The segmentation results were analyzed and compared to a 2-mm spherical target centered at the coordinate-based location of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus. RESULTS: The traditional coordinate-based target had maximal overlap with the junction of the region most connected to primary motor cortex (M1) (36.6 ± 25.7% of voxels on left; 58.1 ± 28.5% on right) and the area connected to the supplementary motor area/premotor cortex (SMA/PMC) (44.9 ± 21.7% of voxels on left; 28.9 ± 22.2% on right). There was a within-subject coefficient of variation from right-to-left of 69.4 and 63.1% in the volume of overlap with the SMA/PMC and M1 regions, respectively. CONCLUSION: Thalamic segmentation based on structural connectivity measures is a promising technique that may enhance traditional targeting methods by generating reproducible, patient-specific pre-operative functional targets. Our results highlight the problematic intra- and inter-subject variability of indirect, coordinate-based targets. Future prospective clinical studies will be needed to validate this targeting methodology in essential tremorpatients.
Authors: Jan Herzog; Wolfgang Hamel; Roland Wenzelburger; Monika Pötter; Marcus O Pinsker; Jan Bartussek; Andre Morsnowski; Frank Steigerwald; Günther Deuschl; Jens Volkmann Journal: Brain Date: 2007-04-17 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Jordan E Axelrad; Elan D Louis; Lawrence S Honig; Ingrid Flores; G Webster Ross; Rajesh Pahwa; Kelly E Lyons; Phyllis L Faust; Jean Paul G Vonsattel Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2008-01
Authors: F Velasco; F Jiménez; M L Pérez; J D Carrillo-Ruiz; A L Velasco; J Ceballos; M Velasco Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: E H Middlebrooks; R A Domingo; T Vivas-Buitrago; L Okromelidze; T Tsuboi; J K Wong; R S Eisinger; L Almeida; M R Burns; A Horn; R J Uitti; R E Wharen; V M Holanda; S S Grewal Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: L Okromelidze; T Tsuboi; R S Eisinger; M R Burns; M Charbel; M Rana; S S Grewal; C-Q Lu; L Almeida; K D Foote; M S Okun; E H Middlebrooks Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Joshua K Wong; Erik H Middlebrooks; Sanjeet S Grewal; Leonardo Almeida; Christopher W Hess; Michael S Okun Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2020-04-12 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Ricardo Insausti; Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga; Martina Bocchetta; Koen Van Leemput; Douglas N Greve; Andre van der Kouwe; Bruce Fischl; César Caballero-Gaudes; Pedro M Paz-Alonso Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jessica Frey; Jackson Cagle; Kara A Johnson; Joshua K Wong; Justin D Hilliard; Christopher R Butson; Michael S Okun; Coralie de Hemptinne Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: I Daria Bogdan; Teus van Laar; D L Marinus Oterdoom; Gea Drost; J Marc C van Dijk; Martijn Beudel Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-06-14 Impact factor: 4.241