Literature DB >> 29306956

Applying a "Big Data" Literature System to Recommend Antihypertensive Drugs for Hypertension Patients with Diabetes Mellitus.

Jing-Xian Shu1, Ying Li2, Ting He3, Ling Chen4, Xue Li4, Lin-Lin Zou5, Lu Yin6, Xiao-Hui Li7, An-Li Wang8, Xing Liu1, Hong Yuan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND The explosive increase in medical literature has changed therapeutic strategies, but it is challenging for physicians to keep up-to-date on the medical literature. Scientific literature data mining on a large-scale of can be used to refresh physician knowledge and better improve the quality of disease treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS This paper reports on a reformulated version of a data mining method called MedRank, which is a network-based algorithm that ranks therapy for a target disease based on the MEDLINE literature database. MedRank algorithm input for this study was a clear definition of the disease model; the algorithm output was the accurate recommendation of antihypertensive drugs. Hypertension with diabetes mellitus was chosen as the input disease model. The ranking output of antihypertensive drugs are based on the Joint National Committee (JNC) guidelines, one through eight, and the publication dates, ≤1977, ≤1980, ≤1984, ≤1988, ≤1993, ≤1997, ≤2003, and ≤2013. The McNemar's test was used to evaluate the efficacy of MedRank based on specific JNC guidelines. RESULTS The ranking order of antihypertensive drugs changed with the date of the published literature, and the MedRank algorithm drug recommendations had excellent consistency with the JNC guidelines in 2013 (P=1.00 from McNemar's test, Kappa=0.78, P=1.00). Moreover, the Kappa index increased over time. Sensitivity was better than specificity for MedRank; in addition, sensitivity was maintained at a high level, and specificity increased from 1997 to 2013. CONCLUSIONS The use of MedRank in ranking medical literature on hypertension with diabetes mellitus in our study suggests possible application in clinical practice; it is a potential method for supporting antihypertensive drug-prescription decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29306956      PMCID: PMC5769362          DOI: 10.12659/msm.907015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Monit        ISSN: 1234-1010


  22 in total

1.  Practice guidelines for primary care physicians: 2003 ESH/ESC hypertension guidelines.

Authors:  R Cifkova; S Erdine; R Fagard; C Farsang; A M Heagerty; W Kiowski; S Kjeldsen; T Lüscher; J M Mallion; G Mancia; N Poulter; K H Rahn; J L Rodicio; L M Ruilope; P van Zwieten; B Waeber; B Williams; A Zanchetti
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  The 1988 report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-05

3.  Which is a better treatment for hypertensive patients with diabetes: a combination of losartan and hydrochlorothiazide or a maximum dose of losartan?

Authors:  Haruo Nishimura; Mitsuyo Shintani; Koji Maeda; Kentaro Otoshi; Masahiro Fukuda; Joji Okuda; Shigeo Nishi; Shinichiro Ohashi; Sumiko Kato; Yasuto Baba
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 1.749

4.  The 1984 Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1984-05

5.  Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. A cooperative study.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care.

Authors:  Peter B Jensen; Lars J Jensen; Søren Brunak
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  MEDRank: using graph-based concept ranking to index biomedical texts.

Authors:  Jorge R Herskovic; Trevor Cohen; Devika Subramanian; M Sriram Iyengar; Jack W Smith; Elmer V Bernstam
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.046

8.  Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data.

Authors:  Jeremy Ginsberg; Matthew H Mohebbi; Rajan S Patel; Lynnette Brammer; Mark S Smolinski; Larry Brilliant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Geographically Modified PageRank Algorithms: Identifying the Spatial Concentration of Human Movement in a Geospatial Network.

Authors:  Wei-Chien-Benny Chin; Tzai-Hung Wen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  "Big Data" Approaches for Prevention of the Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Xinping Jiang; Zhang Yang; Shuai Wang; Shuanglin Deng
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.772

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.