Literature DB >> 29306447

Obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound curriculum and competency assessment in residency training programs: consensus report.

Alfred Abuhamad1, Katherine K Minton2, Carol B Benson3, Trish Chudleigh4, Lori Crites5, Peter M Doubilet3, Rita Driggers6, Wesley Lee7, Karen V Mann8, James J Perez5, Nancy C Rose9, Lynn L Simpson10, Ann Tabor11, Beryl R Benacerraf3.   

Abstract

Ultrasound imaging has become integral to the practice of obstetrics and gynecology. With increasing educational demands and limited hours in residency programs, dedicated time for training and achieving competency in ultrasound has diminished substantially. The American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine assembled a multisociety task force to develop a consensus-based, standardized curriculum and competency assessment tools for obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound training in residency programs. The curriculum and competency assessment tools were developed based on existing national and international guidelines for the performance of obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound examinations and thus are intended to represent the minimum requirement for such training. By expert consensus, the curriculum was developed for each year of training, criteria for each competency assessment image were generated, the pass score was established at, or close to, 75% for each, and obtaining a set of 5 ultrasound images with pass score in each was deemed necessary for attaining each competency. Given the current lack of substantial data on competency assessment in ultrasound training, the task force expects that the criteria set forth in this document will evolve with time. The task force also encourages use of ultrasound simulation in residency training and expects that simulation will play a significant part in the curriculum and the competency assessment process. Incorporating this training curriculum and the competency assessment tools may promote consistency in training and competency assessment, thus enhancing the performance and diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound examination in obstetrics and gynecology.
Copyright © 2017 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  quality control; residency programs; simulation; sonographic images; ultrasound competency; ultrasound curriculum; ultrasound training

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29306447     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Quality of ultrasonography reporting and factors associated with selection of imaging modality for uterine fibroids in Canada: results from a prospective cohort registry.

Authors:  Olga Bougie; Mohamed A Bedaiwy; Philippe Laberge; Gerald Lebovic; Nicholas Leyland; Mostafa Atri; Ally Murji
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-08-12

2.  Giants in Obstetrics and Gynecology Series: a profile of Beryl Benacerraf, MD.

Authors:  Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 10.693

3.  High resolution ultrasound imaging for repeated measure of wound tissue morphometry, biomechanics and hemodynamics under fetal, adult and diabetic conditions.

Authors:  Surya C Gnyawali; Mithun Sinha; Mohamed S El Masry; Brian Wulff; Subhadip Ghatak; Fidel Soto-Gonzalez; Traci A Wilgus; Sashwati Roy; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The "Plan-Do-Check-Action" Plan Helps Improve the Quality of the "Standardized Training of Resident Physicians": An Analysis of the Results of the First Pass Rate.

Authors:  Biyun Tang; Danfeng Lin; Fengjiang Zhang; Mengling Yan; Anwen Shao
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-02-23

5.  Diagnosis and Analysis of Transabdominal and Intracavitary Ultrasound in Gynecological Acute Abdomen.

Authors:  Huali Yang; Renying Wang; Liangchao Zhao; Jinhua Ye; Nengping Li; Lei Kong
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  Fetal Growth Restriction: Comparison of Biometric Parameters.

Authors:  Carolin Marchand; Jeanette Köppe; Helen Ann Köster; Kathrin Oelmeier; Ralf Schmitz; Johannes Steinhard; Arrigo Fruscalzo; Karol Kubiak
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-07-11

7.  Obstetric ultrasound: where are we and where are we going?

Authors:  Jacques S Abramowicz
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2020-08-25

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of an interdisciplinary tertiary center evaluation in children referred for suspected congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract on fetal ultrasound - a retrospective outcome analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Schürch; Gwendolin Manegold-Brauer; Heidrun Schönberger; Johanna Büchel; Olav Lapaire; Annkathrin Butenschön; Evelyn A Huhn; Dorothy Huang; Katrina S Evers; Alexandra Goischke; Martina Frech-Dörfler; Christoph Rudin
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.714

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.