Literature DB >> 2930590

Microsomal and cytosolic epoxide hydrolase and glutathione S-transferase activities in the gill, liver, and kidney of the rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri. Baseline levels and optimization of assay conditions.

D J Laurén1, P P Halarnkar, B D Hammcock, D E Hinton.   

Abstract

Microsomal and cytosolic epoxide hydrolase (mEH and cEH respectively) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activities were measured in the liver, kidney, and gills of rainbow trout. Assays were optimized for time, pH, and temperature, using trans-stilbene oxide (TSO) and cis-stilbene oxide (CSO) as substrates for cEH and mEH, respectively. Optimal pH values for mEH, cEH, and GST were similar to mammalian values (i.e. 8.5, 7.5, and 9). Temperature optima differed between tissues and cell fractions. Specific activity of cEH-TSO was 3-14 times greater than mEH-CSO for all three tissues, and 8-60 times greater on a tissue weight basis. Liver and, to a lesser extent, kidney mEH were active against benzo[a]pyrene 4,5-oxide, whereas gill mEH was not active against this substrate. Liver cytosolic GST was active against CSO and 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) but not TSO, whereas gill and kidney cytosolic GST were active only against CDNB. Liver and kidney microsomal GST were active against CDNB, but no activity was found in gill microsomes. The results are discussed in relation to possible endogenous substrates and uninduced xenobiotic metabolizing capacities of different trout tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2930590     DOI: 10.1016/0006-2952(89)90275-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol        ISSN: 0006-2952            Impact factor:   5.858


  5 in total

1.  Xenobiotic metabolism by glutathione S-transferase in gill of fish from Arabian Gulf.

Authors:  S M al-Ghais; B Ali
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.151

2.  Species-specific differences and structure-activity relationships in the debromination of PBDE congeners in three fish species.

Authors:  Simon C Roberts; Pamela D Noyes; Evan P Gallagher; Heather M Stapleton
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Characterization of the microsomal epoxide hydrolase of hepatic microsomes of the common dab,Limanda limanda.

Authors:  A McCord; N Dunlop; R M Stagg; J A Craft
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.794

4.  Evaluation of fish models of soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibition.

Authors:  J W Newman; D L Denton; C Morisseau; C S Koger; C E Wheelock; D E Hinton; B D Hammock
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Discovery of Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase Inhibitors from Chemical Synthesis and Natural Products.

Authors:  Cheng-Peng Sun; Xin-Yue Zhang; Christophe Morisseau; Sung Hee Hwang; Zhan-Jun Zhang; Bruce D Hammock; Xiao-Chi Ma
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 7.446

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.