Literature DB >> 29305893

Randomized trial comparing the Franseen and Fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.

Ji Young Bang1, Shantel Hebert-Magee1, Udayakumar Navaneethan1, Muhammad K Hasan1, Robert Hawes1, Shyam Varadarajulu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recently, a 3-plane symmetric needle with Franseen geometry and a Fork-tip biopsy needle have been developed for histologic tissue procurement. We compared 22-gauge Franseen and 22-gauge Fork-tip needles in patients undergoing EUS-guided sampling of pancreatic masses.
METHODS: Fifty patients underwent sampling using both 22-gauge Franseen and 22-gauge Fork-tip needles, with randomization of needle order. Two dedicated passes were performed using both needles for cell block. Subsequent passes were performed for rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) using both needles alternately until diagnosis was established. The main outcome was to evaluate for histologic core tissue by comparing area of total tissue, tumor, desmoplastic fibrosis, and rate of retained tissue architecture between cohorts. Other outcomes were rates of diagnostic cell block and diagnostic adequacy at ROSE.
RESULTS: Final diagnosis was pancreatic cancer in 44 patients, neuroendocrine tumor in 2, lymphoma in 1, and chronic pancreatitis in 3. There was no significant difference in area of total tissue (median 6.1 [interquartie range {IQR}, 3.5-10.5] vs 8.2 mm2 [IQR, 4.0-13.0], P = .50), tumor (median .9 [IQR .3-2.8] vs 1.0 mm2 [IQR .4-2.7], P = .33), desmoplastic fibrosis (median 4.3 [IQR, 2.0-6.7] vs 5.2 mm2 [IQR, 1.7-6.1], P = .71), retained architecture (100% vs 83%, P = .25), diagnostic cell block (96.0% vs 92.0%, P = .32), and diagnostic adequacy at ROSE (94.0% vs 98.0%, P = .32) between Franseen and Fork-tip needles, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between Franseen and Fork-tip needles in yielding histologic tissue. Given their ability to yield diagnostic cell block in greater than 90% of patients, the new-generation fine-needle biopsy needles may obviate the need for ROSE. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02910960.).
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29305893     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.11.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  35 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of Recent Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition on the Management of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Susana Marques; Miguel Bispo; Ricardo Rio-Tinto; Paulo Fidalgo; Jacques Devière
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-23

2.  Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses.

Authors:  Kosuke Minaga; Tomoe Yoshikawa; Yukitaka Yamashita; Hiroko Akamatsu; Maiko Ikenouchi; Tatsuya Ishii; Hisakazu Matsumoto; Hiroyoshi Iwagami; Yasuki Nakatani; Keiichi Hatamaru; Mamoru Takenaka; Takuji Akamatsu; Yoshito Uenoyama; Tomohiro Watanabe; Kazuo Ono; Yasutaka Chiba; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pancreatic Cancer Staging in the Era of Neoadjuvant Therapy and Personalised Medicine.

Authors:  Miguel Bispo; Susana Marques; Ricardo Rio-Tinto; Paulo Fidalgo; Jacques Devière
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09-07

4.  Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Thanawin Wong; Tanawat Pattarapuntakul; Nisa Netinatsunton; Bancha Ovartlarnporn; Jaksin Sottisuporn; Naichaya Chamroonkul; Pimsiri Sripongpun; Sawangpong Jandee; Apichat Kaewdech; Siriboon Attasaranya; Teerha Piratvisuth
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.253

5.  Will New Instruments for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Make Us Happy?

Authors:  Chang-Il Kwon
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2018-11-23

6.  EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition for solid pancreatic lesions: Finally moving from fine-needle aspiration to fine-needle biopsy?

Authors:  Mihai Rimbaş; Stefano Francesco Crino; Antonio Gasbarrini; Guido Costamagna; Aldo Scarpa; Alberto Larghi
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 7.  Recent advancement in EUS-guided fine needle sampling.

Authors:  Pujan Kandel; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 7.527

8.  Perivascular Epithelial Cell Tumor of the Pancreas Diagnosed Preoperatively by Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration.

Authors:  Konomu Uno; Shuya Shimizu; Katsumi Hayashi; Tomonori Yamada; Atsunori Kusakabe; Hiroshi Kanie; Yusuke Mizuno; Kazuhiro Nagao; Hiromichi Araki; Tadashi Toyohara; Takeo Kanda; Kohei Okayama; Takanori Suzuki; Shun Miyagishima; Takashi Watanabe; Takahiro Nakazawa
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 1.271

9.  Comparative diagnostic accuracy of EUS needles in solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samuel Han; Furqan Bhullar; Omar Alaber; Ayesha Kamal; Puanani Hopson; Kavin Kanthasamy; Sarah Coughlin; Livia Archibugi; Nikhil Thiruvengadam; Christopher Moreau; David Jin; Pedram Paragomi; Francisco Valverde-López; Sajan Nagpal; Cemal Yazici; Georgios Papchristou; Peter J Lee; Venkata Akshintala
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-05-27

10.  Macroscopic onsite evaluation using endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy as an alternative to rapid onsite evaluation.

Authors:  En-Ling Leung Ki; Anne-Isabelle Lemaistre; Fabien Fumex; Rodica Gincul; Christine Lefort; Vincent Lepilliez; Bertrand Pujol; Bertrand Napoléon
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.