Manan Shah1, Lee Birnbaum2, Jennifer Rasmussen3, Padmini Sekar4, Charles J Moomaw4, Jennifer Osborne4, Anastasia Vashkevich5, Daniel Woo4. 1. Department of Neurology, UT Health Houston, Houston, Texas. 2. Department of Neurology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Electronic address: Birnbaum@uthscsa.edu. 3. Department of Neurology, Baylor Scott and White, Dallas, Texas. 4. Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio. 5. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to identify the effect of hyperosmolar therapy (mannitol and hypertonic saline) on outcomes after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in the Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ERICH) study. METHODS: Comparison of ICH cases treated with hyperosmolar therapy versus untreated cases was performed using a propensity score based on age, initial Glasgow Coma Scale, location of ICH (lobar, deep, brainstem, and cerebellar), log-transformed initial ICH volume, presence of intraventricular hemorrhage, and surgical interventions. ERICH subjects with a pre-ICH modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 3 or lower were included. Treated cases were matched 1:1 to untreated cases by the closest propensity score (difference ≤.15), gender, and race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, or Hispanic). The McNemar and the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare 3-month mRS outcomes between the 2 groups. Good outcome was defined as a 3-month mRS score of 3 or lower. RESULTS: As of December 31, 2013, the ERICH study enrolled 2279 cases, of which 304 hyperosmolar-treated cases were matched to 304 untreated cases. Treated cases had worse outcome at 3 months compared with untreated cases (McNemar, P = .0326), and the mean 3-month mRS score was lower in the untreated group (Wilcoxon, P = .0174). Post hoc analysis revealed more brain edema, herniation, and death at discharge for treated cases. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperosmolar therapy was not associated with better 3-month mRS outcomes for ICH cases in the ERICH study. This finding likely resulted from greater hyperosmolar therapy use in patients with edema and herniation rather than those agents leading to worse outcomes. Further studies should be performed to determine if hyperosmolar agents are effective in preventing poor outcomes.
PURPOSE: We aimed to identify the effect of hyperosmolar therapy (mannitol and hypertonic saline) on outcomes after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in the Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ERICH) study. METHODS: Comparison of ICH cases treated with hyperosmolar therapy versus untreated cases was performed using a propensity score based on age, initial Glasgow Coma Scale, location of ICH (lobar, deep, brainstem, and cerebellar), log-transformed initial ICH volume, presence of intraventricular hemorrhage, and surgical interventions. ERICH subjects with a pre-ICH modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 3 or lower were included. Treated cases were matched 1:1 to untreated cases by the closest propensity score (difference ≤.15), gender, and race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, or Hispanic). The McNemar and the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare 3-month mRS outcomes between the 2 groups. Good outcome was defined as a 3-month mRS score of 3 or lower. RESULTS: As of December 31, 2013, the ERICH study enrolled 2279 cases, of which 304 hyperosmolar-treated cases were matched to 304 untreated cases. Treated cases had worse outcome at 3 months compared with untreated cases (McNemar, P = .0326), and the mean 3-month mRS score was lower in the untreated group (Wilcoxon, P = .0174). Post hoc analysis revealed more brain edema, herniation, and death at discharge for treated cases. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperosmolar therapy was not associated with better 3-month mRS outcomes for ICH cases in the ERICH study. This finding likely resulted from greater hyperosmolar therapy use in patients with edema and herniation rather than those agents leading to worse outcomes. Further studies should be performed to determine if hyperosmolar agents are effective in preventing poor outcomes.
Authors: Daniel F Hanley; Karen Lane; Nichol McBee; Wendy Ziai; Stanley Tuhrim; Kennedy R Lees; Jesse Dawson; Dheeraj Gandhi; Natalie Ullman; W Andrew Mould; Steven W Mayo; A David Mendelow; Barbara Gregson; Kenneth Butcher; Paul Vespa; David W Wright; Carlos S Kase; J Ricardo Carhuapoma; Penelope M Keyl; Marie Diener-West; John Muschelli; Joshua F Betz; Carol B Thompson; Elizabeth A Sugar; Gayane Yenokyan; Scott Janis; Sayona John; Sagi Harnof; George A Lopez; E Francois Aldrich; Mark R Harrigan; Safdar Ansari; Jack Jallo; Jean-Louis Caron; David LeDoux; Opeolu Adeoye; Mario Zuccarello; Harold P Adams; Michael Rosenblum; Richard E Thompson; Issam A Awad Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Craig S Anderson; Yining Huang; Ji Guang Wang; Hisatomi Arima; Bruce Neal; Bin Peng; Emma Heeley; Christian Skulina; Mark W Parsons; Jong Sung Kim; Qing Ling Tao; Yue Chun Li; Jian Dong Jiang; Li Wen Tai; Jin Li Zhang; En Xu; Yan Cheng; Stephane Heritier; Lewis B Morgenstern; John Chalmers Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2008-04-07 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Sarah T Menacho; Ramesh Grandhi; Alen Delic; Mohammad Anadani; Wendy C Ziai; Issam A Awad; Daniel F Hanley; Adam de Havenon Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2020-12-22 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Aaron M Cook; G Morgan Jones; Gregory W J Hawryluk; Patrick Mailloux; Diane McLaughlin; Alexander Papangelou; Sophie Samuel; Sheri Tokumaru; Chitra Venkatasubramanian; Christopher Zacko; Lara L Zimmermann; Karen Hirsch; Lori Shutter Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 3.210