| Literature DB >> 29305240 |
Alphonce I Marealle1, Mario Siervo2, Sara Wassel3, Les Bluck3, Andrew M Prentice4, Omary Minzi5, Philip Sasi6, Appolinary Kamuhabwa5, Deogratias Soka7, Julie Makani7, Sharon E Cox8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Low bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO) is implicated in the pathophysiology of sickle cell disease (SCD). We designed a nested pilot study to be conducted within a clinical trial testing the effects of a daily ready-to-use supplementary food (RUSF) fortified with arginine (Arg) and citrulline (Citr) vs. non-fortified RUSF in children with SCD. The pilot study evaluated 1) the feasibility of a non-invasive stable isotope method to measure whole-body NO production and 2) whether Arg+Citr supplementation was associated with increased whole-body NO production.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29305240 PMCID: PMC5832986 DOI: 10.1016/j.niox.2017.12.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nitric Oxide ISSN: 1089-8603 Impact factor: 4.427
Fig. 1A: Study design. Figure summarises the oral nitrate test (ONT) method used to measure nitric oxide synthesis and the time points of sample collection from children in the 2nd phase of the V-FIT cross-over trial. B Differences in whole body NO synthesis measured using the ONT between supplemented (RUSF+Arg/Citr in combination with daily chloroquine [50 mg]) and non-supplemented arms (base RUSF in combination with weekly chloroquine [150 mg]) during the intervention and wash out period. Data presented as mean±SEMs and P-values from paired Wilcoxan tests for non-parametric data. C and D shows the time-course of the isotopic disappearance of the tracer, expressed as tracer-tracee ratio, followed for 14 h after the administration of an oral dose of labelled sodium nitrate (Na15NO3). The mean values of the tracer-tracee ratio for the saliva kinetic curves are reported on a semi-logarithmic scale and shown for the base RUSF (Fig. 1C) and RUSF+Arg/Citr (Fig. 1D) arms.
Age, sex, weight and plasma amino acid concentrations involved in nitric oxide synthesis in the two groups of children during intervention either with RUSF+ARG/CIT or standard RUSF.
| RUSF+ARG/CITR | RUSF | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 16 | 13 | |
| Age (years) | 11.06 ± 1.23 | 11.30 ± 1.25 | 0.68 |
| Gender (M/F) | 13/3 | 7/6 | 0.11 |
| Weight (kg) | 24.61 ± 3.52 | 25.18 ± 3.43 | 0.75 |
| Arginine (nmol/mL) | 130.16 ± 115.65 | 62.11 ± 15.58 | 0.02 |
| Ornithine (nmol/mL) | 101.05 ± 71.00 | 52.33 ± 12.81 | 0.003 |
| Citrulline (nmol/mL) | 48.19 ± 62.66 | 22.18 ± 6.02 | 0.07 |
| ADMA (nmol/mL) | 0.95 ± 0.25 | 0.96 ± 0.24 | 0.84 |
| Arginine/Ornithine Ratio | 1.22 ± 0.35 | 1.20 ± 0.23 | 0.89 |
| ADMA/Arginine Ratio | 0.011 ± 0.007 | 0.016 ± 0.006 | 0.01 |
| GABR | 0.86 ± 0.23 | 0.84 ± 0.17 | 0.49 |
Data are presented as mean±SD. N = number of subjects; M = Male; F = Female. ADMA = asymmetric dimethylarginine. RUSF = ready-to-use supplementary food. ARG = arginine; CITR = citrulline; GABR = Global arginine bioavailability ratio. Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the two intervention groups.
P value is for comparison of the two intervention groups.