Ulrich Rother1, Werner Lang2, Raymund E Horch3, Ingo Ludolph3, Alexander Meyer2, Olaf Gefeller4, Susanne Regus2. 1. Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuernberg FAU, Erlangen, Germany. Electronic address: ulrich.rother@uk-erlangen.de. 2. Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuernberg FAU, Erlangen, Germany. 3. Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuernberg FAU, Erlangen, Germany. 4. Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuernberg FAU, Erlangen, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The "angiosome" concept as a model for decision making in revascularisation of patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI) has been subject to lively discussion in recent years. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to use intra-operative fluorescence angiography to provide further data on the angiosome concept on the level of microcirculation after tibial bypass surgery. DESIGN, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: This was a prospective analysis of 40 patients presenting with CLI Rutherford stage IV to VI before and after tibial bypass surgery. The macrocirculation was measured by the ankle brachial index. Skin microcirculation was assessed by intra-operative fluorescence angiography. The alteration of microcirculation was compared in direct and indirect revascularised angiosomes. Clinical follow-up investigations were performed and the wound healing rate was compared between the different revascularisation methods. RESULTS: Cumulated microcirculation parameters showed a significant improvement after surgery (ingress, ingress rate p<.001). Likewise, general microcirculatory improvement was observed in each foot angiosome after revascularisation, regardless of the tibial artery revascularised. Furthermore, a comparison of the direct (DR) and the indirect revascularised (IR) angiosomes did not show a significant difference concerning the improvement of microcirculation (difference DR-IR, ingress: 1.69, 95% CI 71.73-75.11; ingress rate: 0.08, 95% CI -12.91 to 13.07). The wound healing rate was similar in both groups, although the time to wound healing was faster by on average 2.5 months in the DR group (p=.083). CONCLUSION: Microcirculatory improvement was seen over the whole foot after tibial bypass. Therefore, fluorescence angiography is a promising tool to evaluate the angiosome concept in future larger studies. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03012750.
OBJECTIVES: The "angiosome" concept as a model for decision making in revascularisation of patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI) has been subject to lively discussion in recent years. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to use intra-operative fluorescence angiography to provide further data on the angiosome concept on the level of microcirculation after tibial bypass surgery. DESIGN, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: This was a prospective analysis of 40 patients presenting with CLI Rutherford stage IV to VI before and after tibial bypass surgery. The macrocirculation was measured by the ankle brachial index. Skin microcirculation was assessed by intra-operative fluorescence angiography. The alteration of microcirculation was compared in direct and indirect revascularised angiosomes. Clinical follow-up investigations were performed and the wound healing rate was compared between the different revascularisation methods. RESULTS: Cumulated microcirculation parameters showed a significant improvement after surgery (ingress, ingress rate p<.001). Likewise, general microcirculatory improvement was observed in each foot angiosome after revascularisation, regardless of the tibial artery revascularised. Furthermore, a comparison of the direct (DR) and the indirect revascularised (IR) angiosomes did not show a significant difference concerning the improvement of microcirculation (difference DR-IR, ingress: 1.69, 95% CI 71.73-75.11; ingress rate: 0.08, 95% CI -12.91 to 13.07). The wound healing rate was similar in both groups, although the time to wound healing was faster by on average 2.5 months in the DR group (p=.083). CONCLUSION: Microcirculatory improvement was seen over the whole foot after tibial bypass. Therefore, fluorescence angiography is a promising tool to evaluate the angiosome concept in future larger studies. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03012750.
Authors: Lauren N Goncalves; Pim van den Hoven; Jan van Schaik; Laura Leeuwenburgh; Cas H F Hendricks; Pieter S Verduijn; Koen E A van der Bogt; Carla S P van Rijswijk; Abbey Schepers; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Jaap F Hamming; Joost R van der Vorst Journal: Life (Basel) Date: 2021-05-11
Authors: Rafael G Jakubietz; Danni F Jakubietz; Raymund E Horch; Joerg G Gruenert; Rainer H Meffert; Michael G Jakubietz Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2019-09-30
Authors: Ulrich Rother; Helena Müller-Mohnssen; Werner Lang; Ingo Ludolph; Andreas Arkudas; Raymund E Horch; Susanne Regus; Alexander Meyer Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 3.315