| Literature DB >> 29304861 |
Fan Wang1, Xiaona Wang1, Ping Ye2, Ruihua Cao1, Yun Zhang1, Yue Qi3, Dong Zhao3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although drug trials with niacin and cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors that substantially increase high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) failed to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease, HDL protection of the cardiovascular system cannot be easily denied. Hence, it may be HDL subfractions that are responsible for the long-held and consistent cardioprotective association of HDL. Arterial stiffness has been increasingly recognized as a strong predictor of subclinical vascular disease, atherosclerotic disease, and cardiovascular mortality. As the association of HDL subfractions and arterial stiffness is not well characterized, we aimed to determine the relations between these two entities in a community-based longitudinal Chinese population sample.Entities:
Keywords: HDL3-C; arterial stiffness; prospective study
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29304861 PMCID: PMC5756332 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-017-0650-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
The clinical characteristics of study participants
| Parameters | overall | cf-PWV ≥12 | cf- PWV < 12 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 61.30 ± 11.4 | 65.59 ± 10.9 | 52.46 ± 11.5 | <0.001 |
| Male [n (%)] | 601(41.53) | 270(47.28) | 331(37.78) | <0.001 |
| BMI | 25.41 ± 3.32 | 25.41 ± 3.28 | 25.26 ± 4.17 | 0.583 |
| Systolic BP(mmHg) | 128.7 ± 17.7 | 135.38 ± 18.37 | 124.37 ± 15.93 | <0.001 |
| Diastolic BP(mmHg) | 77.11 ± 10.26 | 77.00 ± 10.92 | 77.18 ± 9.82 | 0.762 |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 5.39 ± 1.65 | 5.63 ± 1.87 | 5.21 ± 1.35 | <0.001 |
| 2-HpBG(mmol/L) | 6.96 ± 1.11 | 7.71 ± 1.10 | 6.47 ± 1.23 | <0.001 |
| Triglyceride(mmol/L) | 1.80 ± 1.24 | 1.92 ± 1.27 | 1.74 ± 1.24 | 0.017 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5.01 ± 0.93 | 5.02 ± 0.97 | 5.01 ± 0.89 | 0.845 |
| HDL2-C (mg/dL) | 29.85 ± 9.13 | 29.69 ± 9.44 | 30.05 ± 9.08 | 0.593 |
| HDL3-C (mg/dL) | 20.98 ± 4.22 | 20.62 ± 4.12 | 21.42 ± 4.38 | 0.006 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.34 ± 0.42 | 1.30 ± 0.43 | 1.37 ± 0.41 | 0.247 |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.91 ± 0.71 | 2.96 ± 0.73 | 2.87 ± 0.69 | 0.030 |
| Waist-hip ratio | 0.87 ± 0.05 | 0.88 ± 0.06 | 0.86 ± 0.0.07 | <0.001 |
| eGFR (ml/min) | 94.2 ± 14.3 | 88.18 ± 14.19 | 98.63 ± 12.45 | <0.001 |
| Current smoking [n (%)] | 380(26.26) | 175(30.65) | 205(23.40) | <0.001 |
| Hypertension [n (%)] | 755(52.17) | 418(73.20) | 337(38.47) | <0.001 |
| Diabetes mellitus [n (%)] | 302(20.87) | 183(24.22) | 119(18.45) | <0.001 |
Note: Characteristics are reported as percentages for categorical variables and means (±SD) or median (with interquartile range) for continuous variables. The study participants were divided into two groups based on the level of cf-PWV (≥12, <12). Categorical variablesare presented as counts and percentages. The values outside the parentheses are the number of subjects, and the values inside the parentheses are prevalence
BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; HDL2-C, high-density lipoprotein 2 cholesterol; HDL3-C, high-density lipoprotein 3 cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; 2-HpBG, 2-h postload glucose; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; cf-PWV, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity
Fig. 1Relation between HDL3-C and cf-PWV. The Pearson’s correlation was used to describe the relationships between HDL3-C and cf-PWV. cf-PWV was negative relationship with HDL3-C in 1447 subjects. cf-PWV, carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity; HDL3-C, high-density lipoprotein 3 cholesterol; X-axis:the value of HDL3-C (mmol/L); Y-axis: the value of cf-PWV (ms-1); r, coefficient of Pearson’s correlation; P < 0.001 with statistical significance
Fig. 2Relation between HDL2-C and cf-PWV. The Pearson’s correlation was used to describe the relationships between HDL2-C and cf-PWV. There was no relationship between cf-PWV and HDL2-C. cf-PWV, carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity; HDL2-C, high-density lipoprotein 2 cholesterol; X-axis:the value of HDL3-C(mmol/L);Y-axis: the value of cf-PWV (ms-1); r, coefficient of Pearson’s correlation; P < 0.001 with statistical significance
Logistic regression analysis for the association between baseline HDL3-C and follow-up cf-PWV
| carotid-femoral PWVδ | HDL3-C | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | ||
| All subjects (n = 1447) | |||
| Unadjusted | 1.045 | 1.013~1.078 | 0.006 |
| Model 1 | 1.437 | 1.050~1.966 | 0.023 |
| Model 2 | 1.490 | 1.021~1.470 | 0.039 |
HDL3-C, high-density lipoprotein 3 cholesterol; PWVδ change in PWV; PWV, pulse wave velocity; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval
model 1: age and gender
model 2: age, gender, hypertension, DM, current smoking, TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, 2-HpBG, SBP, DBP, BMI, eGFR
Logistic regression analysis for the association between baseline HDL2-C and follow-up cf-PWV
| carotid-femoral PWVδ | HDL2-C | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | ||
| All subjects ( | |||
| Unadjusted | 1.097 | 0.807~1.491 | 0.554 |
| Model 1 | 1.019 | 0.746~1.393 | 0.904 |
| Model 2 | 0.943 | 0.605~1.470 | 0.796 |
HDL2-C, high-density lipoprotein 2 cholesterol; PWVδ, change in PWV; PWV, pulse wave velocity; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval
model 1: age and gender
model 2: age, gender, hypertension, DM, current smoking, TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, 2-HpBG, SBP, DBP, BMI, eGFR
Fig. 3Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of baseline HDL3-C indices to predict cf- PWV. ROC analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the value of the area under the curve (AUC)
Logistic regression analysis for the association between change in HDL3-C and change in cf-PWV
| carotid-femoral PWV δ II | HDL3-C δ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | ||
| All subjects (n = 1447) | |||
| Unadjusted | 1.217 | 0.798~1.855 | 0.361 |
| Model 1 | 0.959 | 0.579~1.540 | 0.862 |
| Model 2 | 1.608 | 0.487~5.307 | 0.436 |
HDL3-C, high-density lipoprotein 3 cholesterol; HDL3-Cδ, change in HDL3-C; PWV, pulse wave velocity; PWVδII, PWVfollow-up-PWVbaseline ≥ 0; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval
model 1: age and gender
model 2: age, gender, hypertension, DM, current smoking, baseline carotid-femoral PWV, change in TC, change in TG, change in LDL-C, change in SBP, change in DBP, change in BMI, change in Waist–hip ratio and change in eGFR