| Literature DB >> 29304478 |
Douglas D Thomas1, Catherine Corey2, Jason Hickok3, Yinna Wang2, Sruti Shiva4.
Abstract
Nitrite represents an endocrine reserve of bioavailable nitric oxide (NO) that mediates a number of physiological responses including conferral of cytoprotection after ischemia/reperfusion (I/R). It has long been known that nitrite can react with non-heme iron to form dinitrosyliron complexes (DNIC). However, it remains unclear how quickly nitrite-dependent DNIC form in vivo, whether formation kinetics differ from that of NO-dependent DNIC, and whether DNIC play a role in the cytoprotective effects of nitrite. Here we demonstrate that chronic but not acute nitrite supplementation increases DNIC concentration in the liver and kidney of mice. Although DNIC have been purported to have antioxidant properties, we show that the accumulation of DNIC in vivo is not associated with nitrite-dependent cytoprotection after hepatic I/R. Further, our data in an isolated mitochondrial model of anoxia/reoxygenation show that while NO and nitrite demonstrate similar S-nitrosothiol formation kinetics, DNIC formation is significantly greater with NO and associated with mitochondrial dysfunction as well as inhibition of aconitase activity. These data are the first to directly compare mitochondrial DNIC formation by NO and nitrite. This study suggests that nitrite-dependent DNIC formation is a physiological consequence of dietary nitrite. The data presented herein implicate mitochondrial DNIC formation as a potential mechanism underlying the differential cytoprotective effects of nitrite and NO after I/R, and suggest that DNIC formation is potentially responsible for the cytotoxic effects observed at high NO concentrations.Entities:
Keywords: Dinitrosyliron complexes; Ischemia; Mitochondria; Nitric oxide; Nitrite
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29304478 PMCID: PMC5975210 DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.12.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Redox Biol ISSN: 2213-2317 Impact factor: 11.799
Fig. 1Oral nitrite supplementation results in DNIC formation. (A) Representative EPR traces demonstrating DNIC formation (denoted with an arrow) in the liver, kidney and brain of mice after oral nitrite supplementation on day 3. (B) Quantification of DNIC from several traces such as those shown in (A). (C) Representative EPR traces demonstrating DNIC formation in the liver of mice supplemented with nitrite (3 g/L) for 0,1,3, or 7 days or after one hour of an intraperitoneal nitrite (260 µg/kg) injection. (D) S-nitrosothiol and (E)heme-nitrosyl concentrations in the liver of mice supplemented as described in panel C. All values are mean ± SEM. n = 5; *p < 0.01.
Fig. 2DNIC formation is not associated with nitrite-dependent attenuation of hepatic I/R injury. Mice were orally supplemented with nitrite (0–3 g/L in the water) or nitrite (3 g/L) and then subjected to hepatic I/R. (A) Plasma alanine aminotransferase levels 6 h after I/R. (B-C) Concentration of (B) Fe-NO and (C) RSNO in the liver tissue 6 h after I/R. (D) Representative EPR traces showing DNIC formation (denoted with arrow) in the liver 6 h after I/R. All values are mean ± SEM. n = 5; *p < 0.01.
Fig. 3NO forms DNIC more efficiently than nitrite in the mitochondrion. (A) A representative EPR trace showing the DNIC signal in liver mitochondria from mice supplemented (red) or not (black) with nitrite (3 g/L in the water). (B-C) Representative EPR traces demonstrating DNIC levels in isolated rat liver mitochondria treated with (B) DEANONOate (0–500 µM) or (C) nitrite (0–1 mM) in anoxic conditions. (D) Quantitation of DNIC from traces similar to those shown in (B-C). (E-F) Concentrations of (E) S-nitrosothiol and (F) Fe-NO in the same livers as (B-C). All values are mean ± SEM. n = 5; *p < 0.01.
Fig. 4High concentrations of nitrite and NO have differing effects on mitochondrial protection. (A) Recovery of respiration and (B) aconitase activity of isolated mitochondria subjected to anoxia/reoxygenation in the presence of either DEANONOate (0–500 µM) or nitrite (0–1 mM) compared to mitochondria that were not subjected to anoxia/reoxygenation (Norm). All values are mean ± SEM. n = 7; *p < 0.01 versus corresponding 0 µM treatment. §p < 0.01 versus same NO equivalents.