Literature DB >> 2930441

Sensory preconditioning and UCS inflation in human 'fear' conditioning.

K White, G C Davey.   

Abstract

This study describes a human electrodermal conditioning experiment involving processes of sensory preconditioning and UCS inflation. In stage 1 of the experiment Ss received six presentations of a CS+ paired with an innocuous 65 dB tone (UCS) and six presentations of an unpaired CS-. In stage 2, Ss in the experimental group had the aversiveness of the UCS inflated as the intensity of the 65 dB tone was increased to 115 dB. In stage 3, Ss were given test presentations of CS+ and CS-. A differential CR to CS+ was found only in stage 3 of the experiment and only in Ss who had experienced the UCS inflation procedure. These results suggest that (i) sensory preconditioning had occurred in stage 1 despite the failure to observe a differential CR in this stage, and (ii) the differential CR observed in stage 3 was mediated by an internal representation of the UCS whose aversiveness had been inflated in stage 2. As well as confirming that processes of sensory preconditioning and UCS inflation can be observed in human as well as animal Ss, these findings have important implications for contemporary conditioning models of clinical fears. In particular, they suggest that a contemporary conditioning model of acquired fears is not bound by the need to discover contiguous stimulus-trauma experiences in the histories of clinical phobias since, in humans at least, processes of stimulus association and UCS revaluation appear to be relatively independent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2930441     DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(89)90074-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  12 in total

1.  Transfer of aversive respondent elicitation in accordance with equivalence relations.

Authors:  Miguel Rodríguez Valverde; Carmen Luciano; Dermot Barnes-Holmes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  The human amygdala and orbital prefrontal cortex in behavioural regulation.

Authors:  R J Dolan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Behavioural and neural evidence for self-reinforcing expectancy effects on pain.

Authors:  Marieke Jepma; Leonie Koban; Johnny van Doorn; Matt Jones; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-10-29

4.  Conceptual similarity promotes generalization of higher order fear learning.

Authors:  Joseph E Dunsmoor; Allison J White; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Associative structure of fear memory after basolateral amygdala lesions in rats.

Authors:  Christine A Rabinak; Stephen Maren
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Dissociation between implicit and explicit responses in postconditioning UCS revaluation after fear conditioning in humans.

Authors:  Douglas H Schultz; Nicholas L Balderston; Jennifer A Geiger; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 7.  Laboratory models of post-traumatic stress disorder: The elusive bridge to translation.

Authors:  Joseph E Dunsmoor; Josh M Cisler; Gregory A Fonzo; Suzannah K Creech; Charles B Nemeroff
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 18.688

8.  Repeated Activation of a CS-US-Contingency Memory Results in Sustained Conditioned Responding.

Authors:  Els Joos; Debora Vansteenwegen; Bram Vervliet; Dirk Hermans
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-30

9.  Do CS-US pairings actually matter? A within-subject comparison of instructed fear conditioning with and without actual CS-US pairings.

Authors:  An K Raes; Jan De Houwer; Maarten De Schryver; Marcel Brass; Raffael Kalisch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Fear but not fright: re-evaluating traumatic experience attenuates anxiety-like behaviors after fear conditioning.

Authors:  Marco Costanzi; Daniele Saraulli; Sara Cannas; Francesca D'Alessandro; Fulvio Florenzano; Clelia Rossi-Arnaud; Vincenzo Cestari
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.