| Literature DB >> 29304048 |
Shengyan Pu1,2, Hui Ma1,3, Daili Deng1, Shengyang Xue1, Rongxin Zhu1, Yan Zhou1, Xingying Xiong1.
Abstract
A bioflocculant (MBFA18) was produced by Aspergillus niger (A18) using potato starch wastewater (PSW) as nutrients. The cultivation processes and flocculating treatment for PSW purification were systematically studied. The flocculating rate of the MBFA 18 achieved 90.06% (kaolin clay) under the optimal cultivation condition (PSW with 5950 mg/L COD, 20 g/L glucose, 0.2 g/L urea and without phosphorus source addition and pH adjustment). Furthermore, effects of flocculant dosage, initial pH, coagulant aid (CaCl2) addition and sedimentation time on the PSW treatment were discussed and studied in detail. The optimum flocculation treatment conditions were determined according to the treatment efficiency, cost and flocculation conditions. During the PSW treatment, 2 mL/L bioflocculant (1.89 g/L) dosage and 0.5 mol/L coagulant aid addition were applied without pH adjustment and 91.15% COD and 60.22% turbidity removal rate could be achieved within 20 min. The comparative study between the bioflocculant and conventional chemical flocculants showed excellent flocculating efficiency of MBFA 18 with lower cost (4.7 yuan/t), which indicated that the bioflocculant MBFA 18 produced in PSW substrate has a great potential to be an alternative flocculant in PSW treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29304048 PMCID: PMC5755778 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190236
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Potao starch wastewater quality.
| CODCr(mg/L) | TN(mg/L) | TP(mg/L) | pH | Turbidity(NTU) | Chroma(times) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10130 | 604.6 | 84.3 | 6.30 | 467 | 128 |
Results of preliminary and further screening.
| Strain number | J3 | J6 | J14 | J25 | M18 | M19 | |
| Flocculating rate (%) | 81.43 | 85.47 | 81.74 | 93.12 | 94.44 | 90.12 | |
| Strain number | J3 | J6 | J14 | J25 | M18 | M19 | |
| Flocculating rate (%) | 82.35 | 87.54 | 79.77 | 92.34 | 95.26 | 89.50 |
Fig 1Flocculating activity distribution of the microorganism and its fermentation broth.
A: Fermentation broth supernatant; B: Mycelial pellets without washing; C:Washed mycelial pellets; D: Fermentation broth.
Fig 2A: Effect of heating temperature on flocculating activity; B: Effect of heating time on the flocculating activity.
Composition analysis by chromogenic reactions.
| Experiment item | Experiment phenomena | Experimental conclusion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Molish reaction | Clear purple ring was found on the interface of concentrated sulfuric acid and sample ( | carbohydrate |
| 2 | Anthrone reaction | The liquid presented cyan ( | Polysaccharide |
| 3 | Biuret reaction | The color of liquid did not change | Without polypeptide |
| 4 | Ninhydrin reaction | There was no phenomenon | Without protein |
| 5 | Protein yellow reaction | It did not present any change | Without protein |
Fig 3FT-IR spectrum of the bioflocculant MFB18.
Fig 4Effect of carbon source on flocculating activity.
Results of the effect of nutrilite addition on flocculating activity analyzed by orthogonal array experiment.
| NO. | Group | COD(mg/L) | Glucose (g) | Urea (mL) | MKP(mL) | Flocculating rate(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A1B1C1D1 | 10130 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 60.87 |
| 2 | A1B2C2D2 | 10130 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 74.07 |
| 3 | A1B3C3D3 | 10130 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 83.85 |
| 4 | A1B4C4D4 | 10130 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 88.04 |
| 5 | A2B1C2D3 | 5950 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 70.34 |
| 6 | A2B2C1D4 | 5950 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 78.73 |
| 7 | A2B3C4D1 | 5950 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 90.53 |
| 8 | A2B4C3D2 | 5950 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 89.13 |
| 9 | A3B1C3D4 | 5060 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 68.32 |
| 10 | A3B2C4D3 | 5060 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 77.64 |
| 11 | A3B3C1D2 | 5060 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 88.35 |
| 12 | A3B4C2D1 | 5060 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 89.90 |
| 13 | A4B1C4D2 | 3560 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 63.82 |
| 14 | A4B2C3D1 | 3560 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 90.84 |
| 15 | A4B3C2D4 | 3560 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 89.90 |
| 16 | A4B4C1D3 | 3560 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 80.12 |
| 76.71 | 65.84 | 77.02 | 83.04 | |||
| 82.18 | 80.32 | 81.05 | 78.84 | |||
| 81.05 | 88.16 | 83.04 | 78.00 | |||
| 81.17 | 86.80 | 80.01 | 81.25 | |||
| Rj | 5.47 | 22.35 | 6.02 | 5.04 | ||
Fig 5A: Effect of pH on flocculating activity; B: Effect of inoculation amount on flocculating activity; C: Effect of culturing time on flocculating activity; D: Effect of the proportion of wastewater medium volume and vessel cubage on the flocculating.
Dosage of bioflocculant cultured different dosage and time.
| Time (h) | 12 | 24 | 30 | 36 | 42 | 48 |
| Dosage (mL) | 5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Flocculating rate (%) | 65.06 | 85.56 | 93.48 | 91.15 | 90.84 | 90.06 |
Comparison of microorganisms cultivated in PDA and PSW substrate.
| Culture substrate | Cost of substrate (yuan/L) | Bioflocculant yield (g/L) | Optimal dosage (mL/L) | Flocculating rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDA | 2.34 | 1.889g/l | 1 | 95.26% |
| PSW | 0.646 | 0.820g/l | 2 | 90.06% |
Fig 6A: Effect of flocculant dosage on flocculating activity; B: Effect of pH on flocculating activity; C: Effect of coagulant dosage on flocculating activity; D: Effect of settling time on flocculating activity.
Effect of cations on the flocculating rate activity of bioflocculant.
| Cations | Na+ | K+ | Mg2+ | Ca2+ | Ba2+ | Cu2+ | Al3+ | Fe3+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67.44 | 74.48 | 85.42 | 92.97 | 92.71 | 78.65 | 93.23 | 94.27 |
Comparison bioflocculant in other research on wastewater treatment.
| Flocculant | Source | Dosage (mg/L) | pH | Treated wastewater | Removal efficiency | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBF-6 | 50 | 7 | Kaolin suspension(5g/L) | 93.87% | [ | |
| p-KG03 | 1 | 4 | Kaolin suspension(5g/L) | 90% | [ | |
| Bacillus pumilus | 100 | 10 | Kaolin suspension(4g/L) | 95.9% | [ | |
| pKr | 1.2 | 7 | Kaolin suspension(4g/L) | 92% | [ | |
| IH-7 | 1 | 7 | Kaolin suspension(2g/L) | 97.4% | [ | |
| MBF-C9 | 5 | 6.53 | Kaolin suspension(5g/L) | 95.29 | [ | |
| DYU500 | 40 | 6~7 | Kaolin suspension(5g/L) | 97% | [ | |
| MBFA18 | 3.778 | 6 | Kaolin suspension(5g/L) | 92.97% | This work |
Fig 7A: Effect of chemical flocculant dosage on flocculating activity; B: Effect of pH on flocculating activity; C: Effect of coagulate dosage on flocculating activity; D: Effect of settling time on the flocculating activity.
Comparison of chemical flocculants and bioflocculant on wastewater treatment.
| Flocculant | Dosage of flocculant (mg/L) | pH | Dosage of coagulant | Settling time (min) | Amount of sludge(g/L) | Removal rate (%) | Cost (yuan/t) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turbidity | COD | |||||||
| Al2(SO4)3 | 700 | natural | 5mL/L | 10 | 0.89 | 92.97 | 60.22 | 32.2 |
| FeCl3 | 700 | 8 | 5mL/L | 10 | 0.42 | 97.66 | 66.93 | 24 |
| MBFA18 | 3.778 | natural | 10mL/L | 20 | 0.165 | 92.97 | 61.01 | |