| Literature DB >> 29304042 |
Niels R Ntamati1, Meaghan Creed1, Ridouane Achargui1, Christian Lüscher1,2.
Abstract
Neurons in the periaqueductal gray (PAG) modulate threat responses and nociception. Activity in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) on the other hand can cause reinforcement and aversion. While in many situations these behaviors are related, the anatomical substrate of a crosstalk between the PAG and VTA remains poorly understood. Here we describe the anatomical and electrophysiological organization of the VTA-projecting PAG neurons. Using rabies-based, cell type-specific retrograde tracing, we observed that PAG to VTA projection neurons are evenly distributed along the rostro-caudal axis of the PAG, but concentrated in its posterior and ventrolateral segments. Optogenetic projection targeting demonstrated that the PAG-to-VTA pathway is predominantly excitatory and targets similar proportions of Ih-expressing VTA DA and GABA neurons. Taken together, these results set the framework for functional analysis of the interplay between PAG and VTA in the regulation of reward and aversion.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29304042 PMCID: PMC5755766 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190297
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Spatial distribution of VTA-projecting PAG inputs.
A, Schematic of the unilateral rabies injection protocol. B-C, Confocal images at low (B) and high (C) magnification showing the expression of TVA-mCherry (magenta) and RVΔG-EGFP (green) in the VTA seven days after the last injection. Scale bars, 500 μm (B) and 50 μm (C). D, Representative confocal images showing confined starter cell infection (i.e. TVA-mCherry and RVΔG-EGFP co-expression) in coronal sections rostral (top) or caudal (bottom) to the VTA of a DAT-Cre mouse. Antero-posterior coordinates (in mm) from Bregma are shown on the top right corner. Scale bars, 500 μm. ml, medial lemniscus; SNc, substantia nigra pars compacta; SNr, substantia nigra pars reticulata. E, RVΔG-EGFP alone was not able to infect neurons without TVA-mCherry expression. Antero-posterior coordinates (in mm) from Bregma are shown on the top right corner. Scale bars, 500 μm. IPN, interpeduncular nucleus. F, RVΔG-EGFP-expressing retrogradely labeled input neurons across the rostral, central and caudal PAG segments. Scale bars, 200 μm. G, Average number of inputs to VTA DA (DAT, n = 5) and GABA (GAD, n = 5) neurons along the rostro-caudal axis of the PAG (two-way ANOVA: no interaction between the cell type factor and AP coordinate factor, F11,120 = 0.7027, p > 0.05; main effect of cell type, F1,120 = 18.2, p < 0.0001; main effect of AP coordinate, F11,120 = 6.31, p < 0.0001; Bonferroni post-hoc test, * p < 0.05). Dashed lines denote the boundaries between rostral, central and caudal PAG. Inset shows the average number starter cells per ROI in DAT-Cre and GAD65-Cre mice (two-tailed t test: no difference between genotypes, p > 0.05). H, Relative contribution of different PAG subregions to the total inputs to VTA DA and GABA neurons (two-way ANOVA: no interaction between the cell type factor and subregion factor, F5,48 = 0.5013, p > 0.05; no main effect of cell type, F1,48 < 0.0001, p > 0.05; main effect of subregion, F5,48 = 42.85, p < 0.0001; Bonferroni post-hoc test, * p < 0.05, **** p < 0.0001). Inset shows the degree of lateralization of the PAG inputs (two-tailed t test: no difference between genotypes, p > 0.05). I, Color-coded representation of the relative input contribution of ipsilateral and contralateral PAG subregions.
Fig 2PAG afferents equally target VTA DA and GABA neurons.
A, Left, schematic of the injection protocol for patch clamp experiments. Right, example of image of ChR2-EYFP infection in the PAG. Scale bar, 500 μm. B, High magnification confocal images showing the colocalization or exclusion of mCherry and TH in DAT-Cre or GAD65-Cre mice, respectively. Scale bars, 50 μm. C, Mean amplitude of the light-evoked postsynaptic currents in VTA DA (n = 47) and GABA (n = 62) neurons plotted against the percentage of connected neurons (Mann Whitney U test: no difference in amplitudes, p > 0.05; Fisher’s exact test: no difference in connectivity, p > 0.05). Scale bars, 20 ms, 20 pA. D, Left, schematic of the patch clamp experiments: whole-cell recordings were performed from mCherry-expressing VTA neurons while PAG afferents inputs were light-stimulated (left). Right, excitatory currents were blocked with kynurenic acid (kyn), while kyn-resistant inhibitory currents were blocked with picrotoxin (PTX). Scale bars, 20 ms, 20 pA. E, Proportion of kyn-sensitive glutamate inputs and PTX-sensitive GABA inputs in VTA DA (n = 17) and GABA (n = 18) neurons (Fisher’s exact test: no difference between cell types, p > 0.05). F, Mean light-evoked current amplitude plotted against Ih amplitude (Spearman’s rank correlation: no correlation between the variables, r = 0.2702, p > 0.05) and comparison of Ih between connected and non-connected VTA DA (left) or GABA neurons (right) (Mann Whitney U test: * p < 0.05).