Kosuke Kuroda1,2, Hidenori Wake2, Shuji Mori3, Shiro Hinotsu4, Masahiro Nishibori2, Hiroshi Morimatsu1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan. 2. Department of Pharmacology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan. 3. Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Shujitsu University, Okayama, Japan. 4. Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Many biomarkers for sepsis are used in clinical practice; however, few have become the standard. We measured plasma histidine-rich glycoprotein levels in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. We compared histidine-rich glycoprotein, procalcitonin, and presepsin levels to assess their significance as biomarkers. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: ICU at an university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy-nine ICU patients (70 with systemic inflammatory response syndrome and 9 without systemic inflammatory response syndrome) and 16 healthy volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We collected blood samples from patients within 24 hours of ICU admission. Histidine-rich glycoprotein levels were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The median histidine-rich glycoprotein level in healthy volunteers (n = 16) was 63.00 µg/mL (interquartile range, 51.53-66.21 µg/mL). Histidine-rich glycoprotein levels in systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients (n = 70; 28.72 µg/mL [15.74-41.46 µg/mL]) were lower than those in nonsystemic inflammatory response syndrome patients (n = 9; 38.64 µg/mL [30.26-51.81 µg/mL]; p = 0.049). Of 70 patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome, 20 had sepsis. Histidine-rich glycoprotein levels were lower in septic patients than in noninfective systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients (8.71 µg/mL [6.72-15.74 µg/mL] vs 33.27 µg/mL [26.57-44.99 µg/mL]; p < 0.001) and were lower in nonsurvivors (n = 8) than in survivors (n = 62) of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (9.06 µg/mL [4.49-15.70 µg/mL] vs 31.78 µg/mL [18.57-42.11 µg/mL]; p < 0.001). Histidine-rich glycoprotein showed a high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing sepsis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for detecting sepsis within systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients showed that the area under the curve for histidine-rich glycoprotein, procalcitonin, and presepsin was 0.97, 0.82, and 0.77, respectively. In addition, survival analysis in systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients revealed that the Harrell C-index for histidine-rich glycoprotein, procalcitonin, and presepsin was 0.85, 0.65, and 0.87, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Histidine-rich glycoprotein levels were low in patients with sepsis and were significantly related to mortality in systemic inflammatory response syndrome population. Furthermore, as a biomarker, histidine-rich glycoprotein may be superior to procalcitonin and presepsin.
OBJECTIVES: Many biomarkers for sepsis are used in clinical practice; however, few have become the standard. We measured plasma histidine-rich glycoprotein levels in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. We compared histidine-rich glycoprotein, procalcitonin, and presepsin levels to assess their significance as biomarkers. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: ICU at an university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy-nine ICU patients (70 with systemic inflammatory response syndrome and 9 without systemic inflammatory response syndrome) and 16 healthy volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We collected blood samples from patients within 24 hours of ICU admission. Histidine-rich glycoprotein levels were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The median histidine-rich glycoprotein level in healthy volunteers (n = 16) was 63.00 µg/mL (interquartile range, 51.53-66.21 µg/mL). Histidine-rich glycoprotein levels in systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients (n = 70; 28.72 µg/mL [15.74-41.46 µg/mL]) were lower than those in nonsystemic inflammatory response syndrome patients (n = 9; 38.64 µg/mL [30.26-51.81 µg/mL]; p = 0.049). Of 70 patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome, 20 had sepsis. Histidine-rich glycoprotein levels were lower in septic patients than in noninfective systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients (8.71 µg/mL [6.72-15.74 µg/mL] vs 33.27 µg/mL [26.57-44.99 µg/mL]; p < 0.001) and were lower in nonsurvivors (n = 8) than in survivors (n = 62) of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (9.06 µg/mL [4.49-15.70 µg/mL] vs 31.78 µg/mL [18.57-42.11 µg/mL]; p < 0.001). Histidine-rich glycoprotein showed a high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing sepsis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for detecting sepsis within systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients showed that the area under the curve for histidine-rich glycoprotein, procalcitonin, and presepsin was 0.97, 0.82, and 0.77, respectively. In addition, survival analysis in systemic inflammatory response syndrome patients revealed that the Harrell C-index for histidine-rich glycoprotein, procalcitonin, and presepsin was 0.85, 0.65, and 0.87, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Histidine-rich glycoprotein levels were low in patients with sepsis and were significantly related to mortality in systemic inflammatory response syndrome population. Furthermore, as a biomarker, histidine-rich glycoprotein may be superior to procalcitonin and presepsin.