| Literature DB >> 29302594 |
Jean-Philippe Rigaud1, Mikhael Giabicani1,2, Marion Beuzelin1, Antoine Marchalot1, Fiona Ecarnot3,4, Jean-Pierre Quenot5,6,7.
Abstract
The question of admission and non-admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) raises several ethical questions. There is a fine line between the risk of loss-of-opportunity for the patient in case of non-admission, and the risk of unreasonable therapeutic obstinacy, in case of unjustified admission. Similar difficulties arise in decisions regarding re-admission or non-re-admission, with the sole difference that the intensivists already know the patient and his/her medical history. This information can help inform the decision when re-admission is being considered. Intensive, i.e., life-sustaining care should be implemented after shared reflection involving the caregivers, the patient and the family, and the same applies for non-implementation of these same therapies. Anticipating admission or non-admission to the ICU in case of acute organ failure, or in case of potential deterioration represents a major challenge for our discipline in the coming years.Entities:
Keywords: Intensive care unit (ICU); admission; non-admission; re-admission
Year: 2017 PMID: 29302594 PMCID: PMC5750248 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.06.53
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN: 2305-5839