Literature DB >> 29302296

Chromosomal identification of cryptic species sharing their DNA barcodes: Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) antidolus and P. (A.) morgani in Iran (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae).

Vladimir A Lukhtanov1,2, Nazar A Shapoval1.   

Abstract

DNA barcoding has been suggested as a universal tool for molecular species identification; however, it cannot be applied in cases when morphologically similar species share their DNA barcodes due to the common ancestry or mitochondrial introgression. Here we analyze the karyotype of Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) morgani (Le Cerf, 1909) from the region of its type locality in the southern Zagros Mountains in Iran, provide first chromosomal evidence for P. (A.) antidolus (Rebel, 1901) in Iran and demonstrate that these two species can be easily identified through analysis of their karyotypes whereas they share their mitochondrial barcodes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ancestral polymorphism; DNA barcoding; biodiversity; chromosomal fusion/fission; chromosomes; cryptic species; cytogenetics; incomplete lineage sorting; karyosystematics; mitochondrial introgression; nomenclature; species identification; taxonomy

Year:  2017        PMID: 29302296      PMCID: PMC5740395          DOI: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v11i4.20876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Cytogenet        ISSN: 1993-0771            Impact factor:   1.800


Introduction

Cryptic species, morphologically indistinguishable or highly similar biological entities, represent a substantial portion of plant and animal diversity, and therefore the search for these species is important for taxonomic, ecological and evolutionary studies (Beheregaray and Caccone 2007, Pfenninger and Schwenk 2007, Dincă et al. 2013, Vodă et al. 2015). Cryptic species can usually be identified through analysis of molecular markers (Vodă et al. 2015), e.g. through analysis of the so-called DNA barcodes, short genetic sequences from a standard part of the genome (Hebert et al. 2003). However, the use of the standard DNA barcodes such as short fragments of the mitochondrial gene COI and the non-coding nuclear sequence, internal transcribed spacer 2 (), is sometimes insufficient to distinguish between evolutionarily young sister species, either because they can be weakly differentiated regarding these markers or because they are too polymorphic (Avise 2000, Lukhtanov et al. 2015a, b, 2016). The absence of lineage sorting among species can often pose a problem for the use of molecular markers in rapidly evolving taxa because the time to coalescence for alleles within lineages can be greater than the time required for speciation (Avise 2000, Kandul et al. 2004). Chromosomal characters in many groups can evolve more rapidly (Lukhtanov 2015, Vershinina and Lukhtanov 2017), and because they are often present as fixed differences, these characters could serve as applicable markers for recently evolved taxa (King 1993, Dobigny et al. 2005, Lukhtanov et al. 2015a, Vishnevskaya et al. 2016). (Rebel, 1901), (Forster, 1961) and (Le Cerf, 1909), a complex of three closely related allopatric species distributed in east Turkey as well as in west and central Iran (Fig. 1) (Eckweiler and Bozano 2016), represent a good example of such situation. Despite morphological similarity (Fig. 2) and identity of COI barcodes in the majority of the studied populations (see Table 2 and sequences published in Wiemers 2003, Wiemers and Fiedler 2007, Kandul et al. 2004, 2007, Lukhtanov et al. 2015b and see Lukhtanov et al. 2015b for the exceptions), they can be easily identified by their chromosome numbers. Haploid chromosome numbers (n) were found to be n=25-27 in , n=39-42 in and n=61-62 in (de Lesse 1960, 1961, Lukhtanov et al. 1998, 2005, 2015b). However, the karyotype has never been studied in Iranian populations from the southern and northern Zagros Mountains including the region of the type locality of (locality 1 in Fig. 1), and this negatively affects the identification and taxonomic interpretation of all known populations. Here we provide first chromosomal data for populations of the complex from the southern and northern Zagros Mountains.
Figure 1.

Map of Iran showing the type locality of and the localities of the analyzed specimens of and . 1 type locality of , “Deh-Tcheshma” (Deh Cheshme near Farsan, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province) 2 , n=27, vic. Sibak, Esfahan Province 3 , n=27-29, 25 km E of Mahabad, W. Azerbaijan Province 4 , n=27-29, 15 km W of Mahabad, W. Azerbaijan Province 5 , n=39-41, Seir, 4 km S of Urmia, W. Azerbaijan Province.

Figure 2.

Male wing pattern of , and . a , Iran, Kordestan Province, Senandaj, 1800 m, 20 July 2000, leg. P. Hofmann b Turkey, Hakkari Province, Ogul-Tal, 1500–1900 m, 1 August 1984, leg. Schurian c Turkey, Van Province, 10 km S of Van, 1900–2100 m, 10 August 1978, leg. Görgner.

Table 2.

Divergence between COI sequences. The numbers of base differences per site between sequences are shown. The shared barcodes (uncorrected COI p-distance = 0) are shown in bold.

123456789101112131415
(1) AY557095 antidolus
(2) AY557089 antidolus0.0015
(3) AY557108 kurdistanicus0.0015 0
(4) AY557074 kurdistanicus0.0015 0 0
(5) AY496762 kurdistanicus0.0015 0 0 0
(6) Q150 morgani0.0015 0 0 0 0
(7) Q170 morgani0.0029 0 0 0 0 0
(8) Q171 morgani0.00290.00150.00150.00150.00150.00150.0015
(9) Q181 morgani0.0015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0015
(10) Q196 morgani0.0015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0015 0
(11) Q197 morgani0.0015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0015 0 0
(12) Q198 morgani0.0015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0015 0 0 0
(13) Q237 antidolus0.0015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0015 0 0 0 0
(14) Q238 antidolus0.0015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0015 0 0 0 0 0
(15) Q239 antidolus0.0015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0015 0 0 0 0 0 0
Map of Iran showing the type locality of and the localities of the analyzed specimens of and . 1 type locality of , “Deh-Tcheshma” (Deh Cheshme near Farsan, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province) 2 , n=27, vic. Sibak, Esfahan Province 3 , n=27-29, 25 km E of Mahabad, W. Azerbaijan Province 4 , n=27-29, 15 km W of Mahabad, W. Azerbaijan Province 5 , n=39-41, Seir, 4 km S of Urmia, W. Azerbaijan Province.

Material and methods

The butterflies were collected in 2016 in north-west and central Iran: in a mountain valley between Fereydunshahr and Sibak (locality 2), in the vicinity of Darman (25 PageBreakkm E of Mahabad) (locality 3), in the vicinity of Khalifen (15 km W of Mahabad) (locality 4) and in Seir (near Urmia) (locality 5) (Fig. 1). We also included sequences of karyotyped and specimens available from GenBank (Wiemers 2003, Lukhtanov et al. 2005) in our analysis. A complete list of specimens included in this study and information about sampling localities are given in Table 1. Karyotypes (Figs 3 and 4) and COI-barcodes (Table 1 and 2) were analyzed using approaches described previously (Lukhtanov et al. 2014, Przybyłowicz et al. 2014). We use the following abbreviations: MI for metaphase I of meiosis and MII for metaphase II of meiosis. Divergences between COI sequences were computed using MEGA6 software (Tamura et al. 2013).
Table 1.

List of studied material (17 specimens). Asterisks indicate unsequenced specimens. Collectors: E. Pazhenkova (EP), N. Shapoval (NS), V. Lukhtanov (VL).

Field CodeGenBank numberTaxonChromosome number (n)LocalityAltitudeDateCollectors/ References
Q055* morganin=27Iran, Esfahan Prov., Sibak (N32°55'; E50°04')2700 m02.08.2017EP, NS, VL
Q060* morganin=27Iran, Esfahan Prov., Sibak (N32°55'; E50°04')2700 m02.08.2017EP, NS, VL
Q150MG457163 morganin=28-29Iran, W. Azerbaijan Prov., vic. Darman, 25 km E of Mahabad (N36°45'; E45°52')1900–2000 m10.08.2017EP, NS, VL
Q170MG457164 morganin=27Iran, W. Azerbaijan Prov., vic. Darman, 25 km E of Mahabad (N36°45'; E45°52')1900–2000 m10.08.2017EP, NS, VL
Q171MG457165 morganin=27Iran, W. Azerbaijan Prov., vic. Darman, 25 km E of Mahabad (N36°45'; E45°52')1900–2000 m10.08.2017EP, NS, VL
Q181MG457166 morganin=28Iran, W. Azerbaijan Prov., vic. Darman, 25 km E of Mahabad (N36°45'; E45°52')1900–2000 m10.08.2017EP, NS, VL
Q196MG457167 morganin=27-28Iran, W. Azerbaijan Prov., vic. Khalifen, 15 km W of Mahabad (N36°45'; E45°32')2100–2200 m11.08.2017EP, NS, VL
Q197MG457168 morganin=27Iran, W. Azerbaijan Prov., vic. Khalifen, 15 km W of Mahabad (N36°45'; E45°32')2100–2200 m11.08.2017EP, NS, VL
Q198MG457169 morganin=28-29Iran, W. Azerbaijan Prov., vic. Khalifen, 15 km W of Mahabad (N36°45'; E45°32')2100–2200 m11.08.2017EP, NS, VL
Q237MG457170 antidolusn=40-41Iran, W. Azerbaijan Prov., vic. Seir, Urmia (N37°28'; E45°02')1750 m14.08.2017EP, NS, VL
Q238MG457171 antidolusn=39-40Iran, W. Azerbaijan Prov., vic. Seir, Urmia (N37°28'; E45°02')1750 m14.08.2017EP, NS, VL
Q239MG457172 antidolusn=39Iran, W. Azerbaijan Prov., vic. Seir, Urmia (N37°28'; E45°02')1750 m14.08.2017EP, NS, VL
AY557093 antidolusn=42Turkey, Hakkari Prov., Dez Çay1500 m22.07.1999 Wiemers 2003
AY557095 antidolusn=ca44Turkey, Hakkari Prov., Haruna Geçidi, SE Yüksekova2000 m21.07.1999 Wiemers 2003
AY557108 kurdistanicusn=ca>55Turkey, Van Prov., Erek Dagi2200 m25.07.1999 Wiemers 2003
AY557074 kurdistanicusn=ca54-56Turkey, Van Prov., Çatak1600–1900 m25.07.1999 Wiemers 2003
AY496762 kurdistanicusn=62Turkey, Van Prov., ÇatakJuly 2001 Lukhtanov et al. 2005
Figure 3.

Karyotype of a Q060, MI, n=27 b Q055, MI, n=27 c Q170, prometaphase I, n=27 d Q171, MI, n=27 e Q197, prometaphase I, n=27 f Q196, MI, n=27 g Q196, MII, n=27 h Q196, MII, n=28 i Q196, MII, n=28. Bar = 10 μ.

Figure 4.

Karyotypes of and . a , Q150, MII, n=28 b , Q150, MII, n=29 c , Q239, MI, n=39, squash preparation d , Q239, MI, n=39, intact metaphase plate e , Q237, MII, n=40 f , Q237, MII, n=41. Scale bar = 10 μ.

List of studied material (17 specimens). Asterisks indicate unsequenced specimens. Collectors: E. Pazhenkova (EP), N. Shapoval (NS), V. Lukhtanov (VL). Divergence between COI sequences. The numbers of base differences per site between sequences are shown. The shared barcodes (uncorrected COI p-distance = 0) are shown in bold.

Results and discussion

In order to investigate the topotypical population of , we first searched for it in its exact type locality in “Deh Tcheshma” (mountain area near the village Deh Cheshme, close to the city Farsan, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province, Iran) (locality 1 in Fig. 1). Unfortunately, we were unable either to find it there or to locate a biotope suitable for butterflies of the - - complex. In our opinion, is extinct in its type locality, probably due to PageBreakclimate change and aridification during the last 100 years. Fortunately, we were able to find typical in a small, relatively humid mountain valley between Fereydunshahr and Sibak, 90 km NW of Farsan (N32°55; E50°04’, Esfahan Province, Iran) (locality 2 in Fig. 1). In two studied specimens from the latter locality, at the MI stage, the haploid chromosome number n = 27 was found (Figs 3a, b). The meiotic karyotype was strongly asymmetric, with a group of larger bivalents (from 6 to 10 in PageBreakdifferent cells) and a group of smaller bivalents (from 17 to 21 in different cells). The number of bivalents that were classified as “larger” and “smaller” was variable, most likely depending on the bivalent orientation. However, in some metaphase plates, the distinction between the larger and smaller bivalents was unclear, and the bivalents gradually decreased in size, with the largest bivalent approximately 10 times larger than the smallest one. Thus, the results obtained confirm the previous taxonomic interpretations (de Lesse 1960, 1961, Carbonell 2003, Lukhtanov et al. 1998, 2005, 2015b, Eckweiler and Bozano 2016) that considered the populations with n=25–27 as . Male wing pattern of , and . a , Iran, Kordestan Province, Senandaj, 1800 m, 20 July 2000, leg. P. Hofmann b Turkey, Hakkari Province, Ogul-Tal, 1500–1900 m, 1 August 1984, leg. Schurian c Turkey, Van Province, 10 km S of Van, 1900–2100 m, 10 August 1978, leg. Görgner. Tshikolovets et al. (2014) and Eckweiler and Bozano (2016) identified the population of the - - complex from the vicinity of Mahabad (West Azerbaijan Province) (localities 3 and 4 in Fig. 1) as ; however, they did not provide any chromosomal data to confirm this conclusion. We analyzed seven specimens from two localities close to Mahabad (localities 3 and 4 in Fig. 1). At the prometaphase I, MI and MII stages, n=27 was determined as the basic number in four specimens (Fig. 3c–g), not n=39-42 as expected for . The number of elements within the karyotype was unstable, varying from n=27 to n=29, most likely due to the presence of two chromosomal fusions/fissions (Figs 3h, i, 4a, b). With respect to the karyotype structure (size and proportion of larger vs. smaller chromosomal elements) the specimens from Mahabad were indistinguishable from the typical described above. The chromosome numbers n=28 and n=29 were not previously reported for (de Lesse 1960, 1961, Lukhtanov et al. 1998, 2005, 2015b). However, since there is no fixed chromosomal difference between the populaPageBreaktions from Sibak and Mahabad, we do not see the need for a description of a new taxon from Mahabad, and therefore identify the populations from Mahabad as . Karyotype of a Q060, MI, n=27 b Q055, MI, n=27 c Q170, prometaphase I, n=27 d Q171, MI, n=27 e Q197, prometaphase I, n=27 f Q196, MI, n=27 g Q196, MII, n=27 h Q196, MII, n=28 i Q196, MII, n=28. Bar = 10 μ. Finally, in three specimens collected in Seir (near Urmia, locality 5 in Fig. 1) at the MI/MII stages, we found that the number of chromosomal elements varied from 39 to 41. The chromosomes ranged in size from very small to large (Fig. 4c–f). This karyotype (n=39-41) seems to be identical to that found in in the neighboring Province Hakkari in south-east Turkey, thus providing first chromosomal evidence for in Iran. Karyotypes of and . a , Q150, MII, n=28 b , Q150, MII, n=29 c , Q239, MI, n=39, squash preparation d , Q239, MI, n=39, intact metaphase plate e , Q237, MII, n=40 f , Q237, MII, n=41. Scale bar = 10 μ.
  15 in total

1.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Alina Cywinska; Shelley L Ball; Jeremy R deWaard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Phylogeny of Agrodiaetus Hübner 1822 (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) inferred from mtDNA sequences of COI and COII and nuclear sequences of EF1-alpha: karyotype diversification and species radiation.

Authors:  Nikolai P Kandul; Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Alexander V Dantchenko; James W S Coleman; Cagan H Sekercioglu; David Haig; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Glen Stecher; Daniel Peterson; Alan Filipski; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Homoploid hybrid speciation and genome evolution via chromosome sorting.

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Nazar A Shapoval; Boris A Anokhin; Alsu F Saifitdinova; Valentina G Kuznetsova
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Reproductive isolation and patterns of genetic differentiation in a cryptic butterfly species complex.

Authors:  V Dincă; C Wiklund; V A Lukhtanov; U Kodandaramaiah; K Norén; L Dapporto; N Wahlberg; R Vila; M Friberg
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Taxonomic position of several enigmatic Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) species (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) from Central and Eastern Iran: insights from molecular and chromosomal data.

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Nazar A Shapoval; Alexander V Dantchenko
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 1.800

7.  Evolutionary mechanisms of runaway chromosome number change in Agrodiaetus butterflies.

Authors:  Alisa O Vershinina; Vladimir A Lukhtanov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Does the DNA barcoding gap exist? - a case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae).

Authors:  Martin Wiemers; Konrad Fiedler
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions.

Authors:  Markus Pfenninger; Klaus Schwenk
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 10.  Cryptic biodiversity in a changing world.

Authors:  Luciano B Beheregaray; Adalgisa Caccone
Journal:  J Biol       Date:  2007-12-21
View more
  4 in total

1.  Karyotype of Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) eriwanensis Forster, 1960 and taxonomic position of P. (A.) interjectus de Lesse, 1960 (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae).

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Alexander V Dantchenko
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 1.800

2.  Karyotype reinvestigation does not confirm the presence of two cryptic species and interspecific hybridization in the Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) damocles complex in the Crimea (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae).

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Konstantin A Efetov; Alexander V Dantchenko
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 1.800

3.  Linking karyotypes with DNA barcodes: proposal for a new standard in chromosomal analysis with an example based on the study of Neotropical Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera).

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Yaroslavna Iashenkova
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 1.800

4.  Identification of Natural Hybrids between Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi (Lederer, 1853) and Callophrys rubi (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) Using Mitochondrial and Nuclear Markers.

Authors:  Nazar A Shapoval; Roman V Yakovlev; Galina N Kuftina; Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Svyatoslav A Knyazev; Anna E Romanovich; Anatoly V Krupitsky
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.769

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.